Deep State power includes the power to stop all questioning about Deep State.

Deep State power includes the power to stop all questioning about Deep State.

by tonytran2015 (Melbourne, Australia).

Click here for a full, up to date ORIGINAL ARTICLE and to help fighting the stealing of readers’ traffic.

Blog No. 1xx

#deep state, #questioning about deep state,

Deep State power includes the power to stop all questioning about Deep State. This is how a minority still can cling to power after it has lost its legitimate hold.

The Deep State or its puppets may have once hold power legitimately but after that it changed the rules so that itself and its puppets can never be thrown out! To do so, it may change the voting laws, enable Identity Politics, ban “hate speeches”, allow its propagandists to morph issues between nationality, race, and religion to frame its opponents with “hate laws”, issue “anti-incitement laws”, give de facto censoring power to its own allies (biased, fake news agents, publishers) then grant itself or its puppets the power to arrest anyone questioning its creeping authority.

The last cited prohibition was pointed out in an American Dissident Voices broadcast titled “All America Must Know the Terror That is Upon Us” by Kevin Alfred Strom:

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?”

The prohibition as well as a vigorous denial of its very own existence is necessary for the Deep State to hide the illegitimacy of its gaining of power.

Dictators such as Lenin, Hitler (who earned his “dictator” status because he lost his war and his rights to reply), Stalin are no strangers to the above methods of a Deep State.

A Deep State gets into power by legitimate means but will change the laws so that it will not be legitimately thrown out!

Notes to commenters.

This is a sensitive issues to many countries. Only comments on theoretical aspects are accepted. Comments mentioning names of races or ethnic groups will not be accepted.



In 2006, Wikiquote dug up such a source: The Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretary by Boris Bazhanov, published in 2002. Translated from the Russian, the version which, according to Bazhanov, was uttered in 1923 by Stalin in reference to a vote in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was this:

I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.


The people who cast the votes don’t decide an election, the people who count the votes do. Joseph Stalin



The Weimar Parliament was elected by proportional representation, with consequent difficulty in forming stable governments. In January 1933 Hitler, as leader of the largest party, became chancellor in a coalition government, and in the following month … He persuaded the president to use his power to suspend the Constitution by emergency decree, to restrict the right of assembly and of the press, to give power to put individuals in protective custody, and to provide for the death penalty for serious disturbances of the peace.

Even after making ruthless use of these powers, the Nazis were unable to gain more than 44 per cent of the votes in the March 1933 election, yet Hitler was still able to persuade the new Parliament to pass an Enabling Act giving him dictatorial powers for four years. Passage of such an act required a two-thirds majority, and even though a hundred left-wing deputies were either under arrest or in hiding, their presence would not have prevented Hitler obtaining the prescribed majority. He now had the power, not only to pass new laws but to amend the Constitution without consulting the Parliament, and without having to persuade the president to issue emergency decrees. A year later President Hindenburg died, and Hitler, using his dictatorial powers, simply combined the job of president with that of chancellor. His elective dictatorship was now uncontrolled.


common attributes: media owned by the leader’s cronies; economy dominated by same; opposition politicians constantly harassed, prosecuted, or in danger of prosecution; state and religion hand in glove; judiciary pressured to comply with government’s diktat; independence of educational institutions relentlessly subverted; corruption ubiquitous in state institutions; free markets victimized by political expediency; foreign NGO’s scapegoated.

[6]. Why Do Dictators like to Appear Democratic? ,

Some of the reasons are very obvious while others are not. The most obvious is that, increasingly, political power is obtained – at least initially – by votes and not by bullets. Therefore, aspirants must show great devotion to democracy, even if that is not their preference. The other reason behind the current popularity of fictitious democracies is less evident: today’s dictators feel more vulnerable. They know to be afraid of the powerful combination of street protests and social media. This flammable mixture of “hot streets” and incendiary social networks does not sit well with dictatorships. Maybe that’s why keeping up a democratic front bolsters their power.


“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?”




[10]. Library of Congress,


[12]., (Census question on citizenship is now even considered offensive).















(“While Israelis may hold dual citizenship, a Basic Law passed in 1958 states that Knesset members cannot pledge allegiance as parliamentarians unless their foreign citizenship has been revoked under the laws of that country.”)


[28]., (“If today [1997] we give in to demands for dual citizenship, we would soon have four, five, or six million Turks in Germany, instead of three million – Chancellor Helmut Kohl, in 1997.”)

[29]., March 29, 2013, (“Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has refused calls from Turkish and other immigrant communities to allow dual citizenship. Many immigrants are reluctant to apply for German citizenship because they want to hold on to their original nationality.”)





RELATED Social Issues Blogs

magnifier horizontal






A new USA Amendment to Define Words and Prohibit Against their Unauthorized Modification is required.

, posted November 06, 2018

Making a credible “Deal of the Century”.

Broken systems of citizenship and immigration fail spectacularly regarding returned terrorist fighters.

Is this Eipstein business too hard to believe?




Social Issues Blogs,

, , , , ,



Click here go to Divider63D400 Home Page (Navigation-Survival-How To-Money).

SUBSCRIPTION: [RSS – Posts], [RSS – Comments]

MENU: [Contents][Blog Image of Contents ][Archives ] [About]