Arizona audit: Focus on ballots, 200k + adjudicated (errors) ballots in Maricopa County red flag, Why so many and how were they processed and who supervised? “Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,” “The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.”…Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel “The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis “Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State: Trump derangement syndrome is not illegal, Election fraud, coverup and lying on vote certification is”…Citizen Wells
Ballots that cannot be processed by voting equipment such as Dominion without human intervention. That should not occur in the hundreds of thousands or high percentages of batches. Yet this happened in Arizona, Georgia and Michigan and is not getting the attention it should receive. Apparently Maricopa County AZ had over 200,000 adjudicated ballots. Dominion Voting Systems facilitates the rapid adjudication of ballots giving the operator the ability to decide voter intent and create a new ballot. This is supposed to happen with oversight from political party reps as witnesses. Affidavits and testimony have indicated the oversight was often missing. Citizen Wells recommends focusing on the audit of Adjudicated ballots.
From Gateway Pundit.
“Note to Arizona Senate from a Former International Audit Executive: If Audit Resources are Limited – FOCUS ON THE BALLOTS”“Tonight we want to provide some words of advice to the Arizona Senate.I was an international audit executive in Hong Kong for a decade. I looked at thousands of data sets and performed audits of the accuracy of the data in relation to the underlying contract. After doing this for years I learned one key thing:” “If resources are a challenge then the Arizona Senate should select the review of the ballots. Based on my experience looking at huge data sets with millions of records and looking into systems as well, if you want to identify fraudulent activities or activities that don’t comply with the law, then focus on the ballots. One individual who we became aware of since the election is Jovan Pulitzer. He claims he can review tens of thousands of ballots in a few hours. He also is an expert in paper ballots and machine interactions. If resources such as time and money are a challenge then Pulitzer should be hired to do the job. Pulitzer was invited to perform work by the Georgia Senate as well:”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rrxfzoZRyao?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en-gb&autohide=2&wmode=transparent https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/note-arizona-senate-international-audit-executive-audit-resources-limited-focus-ballots/
From Citizen Wells January 12, 2021.
“93.69 PERCENT ADJUDICATION LEVEL
During the Georgia Senate election hearing on December 30, 2020, it was revealed 106,000 out of 113,130 ballots had to be adjudicated. 93.69 percent. This happened on election night.”
“96.45 PERCENT ADJUDICATION LEVEL
Now we learn that on November 5, 2020, 132,272 out of 137,134 ballots scanned had to be adjudicated. That is 96.45 %!!!Furthermore: In one county. In 2 batches. A total of 238,272!
Virtually impossible these were all normal voter mistakes.
- Were the ballots misprinted? An honest mistake.
- Were the ballots misprinted to force adjudication?
- Were new ballots created in the process?
- If the old ballots were retained, how were they processed in a recount.
- Supposedly 132,272 ballots were adjudicated the night before the morning of November 5.
GA election official Richard Barron stated the following on election night:“THE ONLY BALLOTS THAT ARE ADJUDICATED ARE IF WE HAVE A BALLOT IN WHICH THERE IS SOME QUESTION AS TO HOW THE COMPUTER READS IT. SO THE VOTE REVIEW PANEL THEN DETERMINES VOTER INTENT.”
MAJOR RED FLAG!!!”
“6. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity. 7. The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error. 8. The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020 consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.”https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/14/michigan-sos-jocelyn-benson-election-chicanery-exposed-judge-elsenheimer-orders-release-of-communications-with-us-mi-legislatures-dominion-social-media/