Austrian health chief displays his ignorance in calling for tax relief for vaccinated – Nwo Report


The Linz City Councilor for Health has outed Thomas Szekeres, President of the Austrian Medical Association, as an uninformed pharma shill. He accused the latter of further dividing society with his nonsensical statements and shameless political posturing. And Szekeres is not the only one who ignores the facts about vaccination – published figures show a different picture of the shots.

Szekeres recently called for tax relief for vaccinated people, but this has reportedly caused absolute incomprehension also among those in the medical profession. The Linz City Councilor for Health, Dr. Michael Raml, riled against the cheap populism contained in the statements of Austria’s chief medical officer. Because of such statements, the division in society has only widened.

“If a Vienna General Hospital professor at a time when 11 percent of Corona intensive care patients were double vaccinated, claims that only unvaccinated people need to be treated in the intensive care unit, he is apparently clueless as to the situation. He frightens the population and prevents the creation of a certain confidence,” said health councelor Raml.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, relying on evidence for any measures taken, he has spared the Linzers from the obligation of wearing a mask outdoors, unlike in Vienna. Likewise, in contrast to other politicians, Raml spoke out against compulsory vaccination from the start. He is against compulsory Corona vaccination for certain professional groups as well as against a general vaccination requirement.

Even the mainstream in Austria is starting to release numbers

There are now Corona-related numbers to be found even in the mainstream media. For example, at the beginning of October, 17 percent of fully jabbed intensive care patients and around 31 percent of fully jabbed patients were in the normal wards in the hospitals in Austria. The rest are considered “unvaccinated” because many had only received the first jab.

In Germany, people are not statistically recorded as “fully vaccinated” until 14 days after the second vaccination. In this way, the numbers are of course skewed. Especially since there is hardly any country in the world that really distinguishes between unvaccinated, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated people and thus traceable data is not provided.

Does the vaccination work well in Austria?

Instead of finally communicating transparently and disclosing all the data, it is pointed out again and again that the vaccination is effective and safe. However, some recent events have been cause for alarm. The city of Waterford in the south-east of Ireland has the highest vaccination rate in the entire country with 99,7 percent of all people over the age of 18. However, it also has the highest 14-day incidence in Ireland of Covid-19 at 1 486 cases per 100 000 residents.

This makes the value in Waterford three times as high as the national average, with an incidence of 493 positive testers in every 100 000 inhabitants. This can no longer be explained by vaccine propagandists.

Decreasing vaccination protection and cover-ups

The latest studies have shown that so-called vaccination protection already wear off again in just 6 to 8 weeks after the administration of the jabs. In addition, Covid-19 shots in no way protect against the transmission of viruses or against infection. In the best case scenario, it only allegedly ensures that the disease is milder, but this in itself is virtually impossible to gauge anyway. And thus the alleged protection is likely to be much lower than assumed.

Also, in England, the risk of serious illness leading to death for the vaccinated is significantly higher than for the unvaccinated. But instead of openly discussing these findings, the flood of propaganda continues unabated.

In the German city of Weimar in Thuringia, for example, officials will no longer be publishing any unpleasant figures related to Covid-19 in the future. The city of Goethe’s birth has become the new stronghold of the Corona cover-up.

More and more hospitalizations involve double-vaccinated people and the citizens of Weimar also noticed this. After the state capital Erfurt, the city has the second highest vaccination rate in Thuringia with 68,5 percent. With a 7-day incidence of 309 cases per 100 000 inhabitants, Weimar has been in fourth place in the state of infection among 21 districts or urban districts.

So the independent mayor Peter Kleine stepped in and announced that this number would no longer be published, because there are many people “with” Corona in hospital.

This distinction apparently did not matter last year – even accident victims were considered “Corona patients”.

So Kleine decreed that the number would no longer be given. This was necessary because this allegedly “clearly distorted reality” and any real data would play into the hands of “Corona deniers and vaccination opponents”.

200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID (Video)… – Freedom Is Just Another Word…

Originally posted on 200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID ? boudica us Published October 28, 2021 27 Views Rumble — *congress exempts itself from the covid vaccine gets treated with ivermectin but prohibits you from taking it. Recently, Joe Rogan, a popular internet personality with millions of subscribers, used Ivermectin,…

200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID (Video) — Boudica BPI Weblog

Wisconsin May Surpass Arizona And Be First State To Decertify 2020 Election – Nwo Report

Source: OAN

Wisconsin May Surpass Arizona And Be First State To Decertify 2020 Election

The Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) knowingly and intentionally violated the State’s election laws and instructed subordinate election officials to do the same, according to the Racine County Sheriff, Christopher Schmaling. In a shocking press conference on Thursday, law enforcement officials from the Racine County Sheriff’s Office laid out their case of election fraud in Racine during the 2020 election. The investigation focused on abuse of voters confined to nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Investigators discovered that Wisconsin Election Officials expressly discussed that their proposed conduct for the 2020 election would violate state law, and yet they decided to do it anyway. They memorialized their decision in a letter they wrote and disseminated to every single county clerk’s office in Wisconsin.

Sheriff Schamling stated that officials indicated that they “needed the flexibility to violate the law,” and that they needed to “instruct county clerks to break the law.” Despite the blatant absurdity of the statements, the express illegality of their activities, and the fact that they were all being recorded on their Zoom meeting, election officials went ahead and violated the law anyway. The sheriff’s office played the video from the Zoom meeting of the commissioners discussing their need to break the law and instruct others to do the same. Couple that with the confirmed activities that actually occurred during the 2020 election, and Sheriff Schamling has a very compelling case of election fraud.

Specifically, the letter from WEC instructed county officials to not allow Special Voting Deputies into nursing homes. These individuals are trained professionals responsible for ensuring the rights of the nursing home residents. They’re also responsible to ensure the elders are not abused for their voting privileges and that no ballot harvesting or other illegal activity takes place. WEC decided that due to COVID, it was too dangerous for these individuals to enter the facility, despite the fact that Wisconsin state law requires them to be a part of the process. By requiring county clerks to exclude these deputies from the election process, WEC committed election fraud.

State leaders and nursing home administrators thought it was safe enough for the fish tank maintenance worker to enter the facility, Door Dash delivery drivers, vending machine workers, elevator repairmen, bird cage cleaner, and copy machine vendor, but it was too dangerous to allow Special Voting Deputies inside to ensure that no abuses of the rights to the elderly were taking place. It’s a preposterous position to take, but it’s the position WEC took. It’s also a violation of Wisconsin Statute 6.875.

The sheriff and his sergeant told multiple horrific stories of victimizing the elderly for the purpose of stealing their vote. On multiple occasions, election workers cast ballots on behalf of incapacitated residents of the nursing home. Those residents who were not lucid had ballots cast on their behalf if they were simply capable of pointing to the ballot. Election workers then interpreted that point as an affirmative vote for a specific candidate. Multiple family members of nursing home residents attended the press event to voice their concern that their loved ones were manipulated for their vote. Some of the complaints stated that election workers cast ballots on behalf of incapacitated residents in accordance with how they “voted last election,” despite the fact the resident was not cognizant, nor capable to consenting to the vote.

Sheriff Schmaling stated that they believe this happened in most of the nursing homes in the state, but that they would enforce the law as it pertained to those in Racine County. There were 11 nursing homes in Racine and all are believed to have suffered the similar abuse. There are 72 counties in Wisconsin making for hundreds of nursing homes subject to this abuse, and hundreds of ballots were used in each of the nursing homes. Based on just nursing home abuses and election fraud, there could be as many as 50,000 – 100,000 fraudulent ballots cast in Wisconsin during the 2020 election. Biden supposedly won the state by 20,682. This is more than enough fraud to have changed the outcome of the election.

The Wisconsin Election Commission orchestrated a criminal and fraudulent election. The sheriff has said that he is referring the crimes to the Racine District Attorney, Patricia Hanson. Hanson is an elected Republican and will be called upon to prosecute these crimes. At the same time, the Wisconsin legislature has more than enough evidence to show that the results certified in 2020 are fraudulent and must be decertified. It’s incumbent upon the Republican state legislature to stand by the laws they pass and not allow criminal activity to overrule law and order. The Wisconsin State Legislature is primed to decertify their election. Will they?

US lawmakers play with the idea of social media ID verification, following proposals from other countries – Nwo Report

A draft discussion bill hints at future proposals.

Source: Tom Parker

Anonymity is often vital for those who want to speak truth to power and expose government wrongdoing. We only need to look to the US government’s treatment of National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to see how far governments will go to target those that don’t have the shield of anonymity when they reveal information that governments want to hide.

And in 2021 governments have renewed their efforts to end online anonymity by proposing and introducing new laws that force users to hand over their identity documents (IDs) to use social media and by framing online anonymity as something that needs to be eradicated.

While most of these government efforts to end online anonymity have been widely covered in the media, America’s recent proposals have managed to stay out of the spotlight.

But despite flying under the radar, these proposals do exist in a discussion draft that was introduced by Congressman John Curtis in May.

The discussion draft aims to “require a provider of a social media service to verify the identity of users of the service, and for other purposes” and prevent anyone from creating a social media account without verifying their identity.

Not only does this discussion draft intend to make ID verification mandatory for anyone who wants to create a social media account but it also wants to force social media companies to report users to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) whenever they suspect users have submitted fake IDs. Additionally, it contains a requirement for the FTC to submit these reports to the United States (US) Department of Justice (DOJ).

Social media companies that fail to comply with the terms outlined in this discussion draft will be targeted under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) which allows the FTC to define “unfair or deceptive acts or practices,” impose additional requirements on companies to prevent these acts or practices, and introduce “significant civil penalties for rulebreakers.”

While the discussion draft does include an exception for social media providers that have annual revenues of less than $1 billion for three consecutive years, the large social media platforms where the vast majority of the more than three billion total social media users are registered will be forced to verify the real identity of their users under the discussion draft’s current requirements.

Alternative social media platforms will only be shielded from this requirement if their revenues stay below the annual $1 billion threshold and if the discussion draft becomes law, this limit could be encroached upon and lowered, as has happened many times before with other laws.

We obtained a copy of this social media ID discussion draft for you here.

This discussion draft is the latest of many attempts by local and federal US governments to erase online anonymity by forcing online service providers to verify the identity of their users. Some of the most notable attempts include:

The Communications Decency Act (CDA) (1996) which was signed into law on February 8, 1996 and prohibited the “the knowing transmission of obscene or indecent messages” to minors but allowed online service providers to protect themselves from prosecution by implementing age verification measures. The provisions related to age verification were ultimately struck down after the Supreme Court declared them an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment.

The Child Online Protection Act (COPA) (1998) which was signed into law on October 21, 1998 and required website operators and content providers to prove that they had restricted children’s access to “harmful” content by requiring the use of a credit card, a debit card account, an “adult access code,” an “adult personal identification number, a “digital certificate that verifies age,” or “any other reasonable measures that are feasible under available technology.” However, it was blocked from taking effect by multiple courts which declared it unconstitutional on First Amendment groups. After more than a decade of ongoing legal challenges, the Supreme Court killed the law by refusing to hear further appeals.

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) (1998) which was signed into law on October 21, 1998 and requires websites and online service providers to obtain “verifiable parental consent” if they’re “directed to children under 13” or they have “actual knowledge” that they collect personal information from children under 13.

Louisiana’s Online Age Verification Law (2015) which required publishers of material that’s deemed to be “harmful to minors on the Internet” to age-verify every internet user before providing access to the material. The law was permanently blocked by a federal judge in 2016 for violating the First Amendment.

While this discussion draft is likely to ultimately fail for First Amendment violations, many other countries that don’t have these same First Amendment protections are pushing similar proposals that would end online anonymity.

UK lawmakers recently bolstered their calls for a social media ID system in the wake of the murder of Member of Parliament (MP) David Amess, despite it being unknown whether the murder suspect had previously targeted Amess on social media.

In Australia, the federal government recently released an exposure draft for an Online Privacy Bill that would require citizens to verify their age by submitting official ID in order to create social media accounts, days after Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for social media platforms to be held responsible for anonymous users.

And in Canada, the proposed Senate Bill S-203, the “Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act,” would essentially mandate age-verification for all sites that host user-generated content by making these criminally liable whenever an underage user engages with sexual content on their service unless they implement “a prescribed age-verification method.”

If these governments succeed with their push to end online anonymity, protest and dissent are likely to be one of the first things they attempt to crush. Australia’s authoritarian response to citizens who protest or oppose the government’s COVID response shows just how far governments will go to target those who dissent on social media. And if social media accounts were forcibly linked to real ID, it would be even easier for governments to use these tactics against their critics.

In fact, Lin Junyue, one of the early theoretical designers of China’s all-encompassing social credit system which links real IDs to a wide range of online data, has actually touted the ease with which it allows governments to crush dissent as one of its main benefits.

“If you had the social credit system, there never would have been the yellow vests,” Lin Junyue said in an interview with European public service channel ARTE. “We would have detected that before they acted. One could have foreseen…these events would not have happened. It is one of the great advantages, the social credit system.”

Not only do these proposals to end online anonymity threaten citizens’ rights to protest and criticize the government but by forcing social media platforms to collect real IDs, they also create a huge privacy risk. Numerous vaccine passport systems which impose similar ID collection requirements have already exposed the personal data and IDs of millions of people. Forcing social media companies to collect real IDs would create an even larger honeypot that could be leaked or breached.

Even more concerning is that these attacks on online anonymity serve as a gateway to a dystopian digital ID system that would give governments even more control of people’s digital activities. COVID passports are already paving the way for such a system in the physical world by making access to certain premises and events contingent on showing a vaccine passport. Forcing users to associate their social media accounts with real ID would make it easy for governments to expand this control to the digital realm and dictate which websites and online services people are allowed to use.

Although the First Amendment will likely shield US citizens from this government encroachment, for now, the persistent push to end online anonymity shows that many Western lawmakers are more than happy to ignore these significant privacy and civil liberties concerns so that they can more easily control and monitor their citizen’s digital lives.

Pharmacy Manager QUITS On Store Intercom, Says No More “Poison” | Aletho News

By Ethan Huff | Natural News | October 27, 2021

Safeway grocery store #1892 in Cortez, Colo., just lost its pharmacy manager because she no longer wants to administer “this poison,” referring to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines,” to customers.

According to reports, Nichole Belland took to the store’s intercom to announce that she is leaving her position for good because she can no longer in good conscience continue jabbing people with these “Operation Warp Speed” abominations they are calling “vaccines.”

This is Nichole Belland, pharmacy manager for Safeway store at 1892 of Cortez,” Belland was heard saying over the intercom to a store full of surprised shoppers.

I quit, effective immediately, because I will not give this poison to people. Wake up, everybody. This is poison. This is hurting people. I’ve seen it. I’ve seen customers die. Wake up, do not take it.

If It Came Down To It, Would You Quit Your Job Rather Than Harm Others With Covid Jabs?

Steve Kirsh, the executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF), got the chance to talk with Belland about what prompted her to leave her job in the dramatic way that she did.

It turns out that Belland had not worked at Safeway for several months prior to coming on the loudspeaker to make her announcement. Almost immediately after she was told by her supervisor that she would need to jab people with the “Operation Warp Speed” drugs, she decided to quit.

Belland was told at the time that she would have no choice but to administer the shots on demand, or else be fired from her position. She instead decided to go on temporary personal leave, but that was set to expire on October 15.

I had tremendous concerns about these shots early on,” Belland says.

Not seeing any other way to get her message across before being forced out of her job, Belland went in on October 14, took her certificates and degrees off the wall, and proceeded to use the intercom to reveal publicly why she was essentially being forced to quit.

Belland says that around 8-10 customers were in front of her at the time when she picked up the intercom microphone and began speaking the truth into it. She had no idea that this brave act would end up going viral, possibly inspiring others who feel similarly to do the same.

Like many, Belland says that she is not necessarily “anti-vaccine.” She is anti-experimental gene therapy, which is technically what covid shots are since they were not developed using the same technologies as existing vaccines.

Prior to quitting, Belland had administered “thousands” of other shots to patients at her pharmacy, where she worked for 12 years after graduating from the University of Minnesota. However, when covid injections came along, it was a different story.

You can watch the full video interview between Kirsh and Belland at Red Voice Media.

Bravo! Good for her, I would do the same thing if I was in her shoes!” wrote a commenter at Red Voice Media. “No job is more important than your overall health!

No job or any action is more important than the realization that you may be directly responsible for the injury or even death of another,” responded another, clarifying the reason why Belland quit.

Every time a nurse who sticks a needle in someone’s arm who becomes ill or deceased later, and when on learning of their loss, she intentionally continues – is committing a premeditated harmful act to another.

As the vaccine mandates pile on, we can expect more incidents like this to occur. More of the latest can be found at

Covid-19 origins may never be known, US intelligence agencies say – BBC News

… It said the intelligence community remains divided on the most likely origin of the virus. Four agencies assessed with “low confidence” it had originated with an infected animal or a related virus.

But one agency said it had “moderate confidence” that the first human infection most likely was the result of a laboratory accident, probably involving experimentation or animal handling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology…

EU Parliament sues European Commission over rule-of-law ‘inaction’ amid major row with Poland — RT World News

The European Parliament has sued the executive branch of the EU
government, the European Commission, on Friday, for its failure to use
the sanctions mechanism against rule-breaking member states like Poland.
The mechanism in question
was introduced in late 2020 and allows the EU to withhold funding of
member states that Brussels sees as defying the rule of law. The nation
currently topping the blacklist is Poland, whose conservative government
has adopted a number of policies that the EU finds objectionable.

expect the European Commission to act in a consistent manner and live
up to what President von der Leyen stated during our last plenary
discussion on this subject. Words have to be turned into deeds,” EU Parliament President David Maria Sassoli said, commenting on the filing.

Poland’s defiance of Brussels and possible withdrawal of its funding as
punishment has been most visible in the news lately, other Eastern
European nations like Hungary may also find themselves on the receiving
end of the EU’s ire.

The European Court of Justice earlier this
week ordered Poland to pay a million euro (around $1.2 million) every
day until it brings its judicial system in line with EU standards for
the rule of law. Warsaw lashed out at the “unlawful penalties”, with Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro stating that his nation “should not pay a zloty” for the kind of justice system it chooses to have.

Also on
Poland won’t ‘succumb to
lawlessness’, justice minister declares, refusing to ‘pay any zloty’ to
EU over fine for judicial reforms

Alleged rape of teen girl in school bathroom tests McAuliffe’s stances on transgender, parent rights – Washington Times

…The father was dragged out of a school board meeting and arrested when he attempted to confront the members about the assault of his daughter by a boy wearing a skirt in the girls’ bathroom…

(TUSTIN, Calif.) SCAM REPORT: A California veteran fell victim to a phishing scam, losing thousands of dollars in an account meant to pay for his daughter’s college tuition and, almost a month later, is still frozen out of his Chase Bank account. | Ace News Services

#AceNewsReport – Oct.29: The scam started with a text message, allegedly sent from Chase Bank, and continued with a phone call from a woman claiming to work for the bank: It was later confirmed that the text message was a phishing scheme, which is a cyber crime.

#AceDailyNews says according to CBSLocal Veteran Falls Victim To Phishing Scam, Loses $19,000 From Chase Bank Account Meant For Daughter’s College EducationIt’s a custodial account for my daughter’s education. It was cleaned out,” said Navy veteran and Laguna Niguel resident Eric Cletcher, who insisted that the more than $19,000 was lost through no fault of his own……