Tenth Circuit Reinstates Death Penalty for Defendant Who Pleaded Guilty as an Accomplice – JONATHAN TURLEY


It is certainly difficult to have any sympathy for Taylor who was found guilty in a crime that was horrific on every level. His accomplice Ed Deli fatally shot Kaye Tiede and her mother, Beth Potts. They then kidnapped Tiede’s daughters, ages 20 and 17. The Tenth Circuit however noted that Taylor was directly responsible for wounding the father:

“About two hours after the initial shooting, Linae’s sister (Tricia) and her father (Rolf) arrived at the house. Mr. Taylor instructed Mr. Deli to shoot Rolf. When Mr. Deli hesitated, Mr. Taylor shot Rolf twice in the head and left him in the cabin, believing him to be dead.”

At trial, Deli denied guilty, was tried and given a life sentence. Taylor on the other hand admitted guilty and was then sentenced to death. Taylor argued insanity and his words to the state psychiatrist were used against him during sentencing. (Many years ago, I litigated a similar issue in the Fifth Circuit in Brown v. Louisiana on the need to give Miranda warning in such psychiatric evaluations).

A few month ago, U.S. District Court Judge Tena Campbell overturned Taylor’s death sentence due to ineffective legal counsel. On May 1, 1991, Taylor accepted a plea to two counts of capital murder in exchange for eight lesser charges being dropped. The deal, however, did not include taking the death penalty off the table and he was sentenced to death.

Moreover, the district court found that there was inadequate discovery by his defense counsel, particularly on proving his claim that he did not actually fire the murder weapon even though prosecutors claimed that he carried and reloaded the gun. The court noted:

“He did not visit the scene. He did not hire an investigator. And critically, he did not consult, much less hire, experts. If [Defense counsel Elliott] Levine had fulfilled his duty to investigate by, for example, hiring a ballistics expert and a forensics expert, he would have uncovered evidence that contradicted the state’s evidence. Mr. Levine was not informed when he advised Mr. Taylor, and he made little to no effort to become informed. There was no articulated, or conceivable, strategic reason for failing to hire an investigator and experts in a death penalty case.”

Ultimately, the plea itself was undermined by what the court found was ineffective counsel.

Judge Campbell held:

“The court finds that Mr. Taylor’s constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when he pleaded guilty to two capital murders based on inexcusably uninformed advice from counsel which then exposed him to the possibility of execution. The record shows there is a reasonable probability that, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, Mr. Taylor would not have pleaded guilty to two capital murders and would have insisted on going to trial with evidence that Mr. Deli, not Mr. Taylor, caused the deaths of Kaye Tiede and Beth Potts.”

The Tenth Circuit disagreed and reinstated that death penalty. It dismissed any need to even look at the ineffective counsel claim due to the wording of the plea and related showings:

“On appeal, the state does not challenge Mr. Taylor’s new evidence. The state concedes for the sake of argument that Mr. Taylor did not fire the fatal shots. Rather, the state argues the district court erred as a matter of law in confining the actual innocence inquiry to Mr. Taylor’s guilt of capital murder as a principal. According to the state, Mr. Taylor pleaded guilty to the two counts of capital murder generally, not under a specific theory of liability. Thus, the state argues that because Mr. Taylor cannot establish actual innocence as both a principal and an accomplice, his claims for relief remain procedurally defaulted and we cannot consider them.

We agree with the state. As we explain below, under Utah’s laws regarding accomplice liability, the state provided Mr. Taylor notice of what crime he was being charged with and pleading guilty to: capital murder. And Mr. Taylor has done nothing to prove a reasonable, properly instructed jury more likely than not would have reasonable doubt about his guilt as an accomplice to the murders. Thus, we need not reach Mr. Taylor’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel leading to a defective guilty plea because it remains procedurally barred.”

The fact that the ineffective counsel claims were not considered are deeply troubling. This strikes me as a compelling ineffective counsel case. Again, I agree with the Tenth Circuit that Taylor’s guilt as an accomplish is well-established. However, he had a right to a fully informed and prepared defense.

There is also the incongruity in the sentences in the case. While not a viable independent basis for challenge, it is troubling to see the shooter given life when the non-shooter who pleaded guilty was given death. It also reflects an interesting dynamic with juries. A jury was given an opportunity to express its condemnation with Deli in finding his guilty but then felt life was sufficient as a penalty. The jury was not given the same opportunity to adjudicate guilt for Taylor and then, in its only decision, opted for the death penalty on sentencing.

In the end, if we are to retain the death penalty, there must be robust protections for effective counsel. I do not see those protections in this case despite the heinous conduct of the accused.

Here is the opinion: Taylor v. Powell

RESILIENT LIVING: What Would a Complete Supply Chain Breakdown Really Look Like? – By Aden Tate – PliscaPlace


Source – theorganicprepper.com “…Grocery stores rely on just-in-time systems to get their food to their customers. On average, this means that a grocery store has roughly a week’s worth of food within its four walls at any given time. However, remember that this is a week’s worth of food in normal circumstances. As the 2020 […]

RESILIENT LIVING: What Would a Complete Supply Chain Breakdown Really Look Like? – By Aden Tate

What do we want? South-facing windows! | Aletho News


By Ivor Williams | The Conservative Woman | August 2, 2021

YOU may have read recently that ‘Britain is failing to protect its vulnerable citizens. Thousands of preventable deaths could be triggered every year.’ You may have supposed that some road safety organisation was at it again, worried about silent electric cars. Or maybe it was the RNLI having a go about inflatables on the beach. Possibly the opposition playing safe and attacking the crime rate or the NHS?

There’s a clue in the next sentence. ‘As global heating worsens and heatwaves become more frequent, the problem is likely to worsen significantly.’ This is Baroness Brown of Cambridge, a member of the Climate Change Committee (CCC), and she goes on to claim that by 2050 there could be three times as many heat-related deaths as there are today.

This is a Guardian piece about the CCC’s comments on a Met Office warning about hotter summers, so let’s stop here and take a deep breath of reality.

The number of heat-related summer deaths are monitored by Public Health England. The three years 2017-19 averaged 847, but in 2020 there were 2,556, in line with 2003 (2,334) and 2006 (2,323). Let’s be fair and assume global warming will continue, so over the next few years we may have a yearly average of 2,500, then (according to the CCC) on to 7,500 by 2050.

Back in Wonderland there’s apparently no need to worry. The Telegraph has reassuring news from its Environment Editor, Emma Gatten. The CCC, she says, ‘called for the introduction of new regulations to ensure developers were not building homes that are uninhabitable as temperatures rise . . . Measures that can easily be incorporated when building new homes include avoiding large south-facing windows, including external shutters, trickle vents, green roofs, and green walls covered in vegetation.’

There we are, then, problem solved. However, the world that you and I live in has a season called winter when it gets cold even here in the UK, and there is, of course, an opposite effect. Again Public Health England has the data: ‘Cold-related deaths represent the biggest weather-related source of mortality in England, and on average, there are approximately 35,000 excess winter deaths each year in England and Wales.’

Being kind and using the CCC’s figure for 2050, there are still over four and a half times as many excess deaths in winter as in summer. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation looked at the problem some time ago. Not surprisingly, they found that ‘the magnitude of the winter excess was greater in people living in dwellings that appear to be poorly heated. The percentage rise in deaths in winter was greater in those dwellings with low energy-efficiency ratings, and those predicted to have low indoor temperatures during cold periods’.

There are wide variations on recommended indoor warmth in winter. The Met Office must employ all young, hot-blooded people, because they say ‘you should heat your home to the temperature of at least 18°C. This is particularly important if you have reduced mobility, are 65 or over, or have a health condition, such as heart or lung disease.’

For the last twenty years I have been cold from October to March, and have recently become a nonagenarian so will probably be even colder this winter. The figure of 18 is ridiculous. I live in a reasonably well-insulated house with gas central heating; the winter thermostat setting is 21 or above and even then the winter clothing level is four layers.

The heat pump threat has receded by five years, but these things are notorious for their inability to warm a house properly. The CCC want smaller south-facing windows but the cheapest source of additional heat even in winter is the sun. Any day that it’s available let it shine in through south-facing windows. Have shutters for summer.

The CCC say possibly 7,500 excess summer deaths by 2050. But they seem to be relying on our climate warming unbelievably quickly to save 35,000 of us going shivering to our doom every winter.

The Daily Dose: WHO not pleased with booster shot plans; Space transportation getting crowded. – Scientific Inquirer


Each booster, they say, represents a vaccine dose that could instead go to low- and middle-income countries, where most citizens have no protection at all, and where dangerous coronavirus variants could emerge as cases surge.” The organization maintains that the shots would be more useful if given to low- and lower-middle-income countries...

Nullifying Nuremberg – Nwo Report


Source: Pennel Bird

Dr. Josef Mengele is one of the true monsters of history. His profoundly evil medical experiments on Jews, the disabled, the mentally impaired, and other Third Reich deplorables are the stuff of pitch-black fever dreams. Combining disparate elements of pernicious ideologies including eugenics, antisemitism, racial purity, and the German ideal of lebensraum (“room for living”), what eventually became Nazism informed Hitler’s ethos as he rose to power. His malignant weltanschauung eventually coalesced into the Final Solution.

Hitler’s infernal vision metastasized quickly to infect the belief systems of top-tier Nazis. Among other atrocities, Mengele used injections to attempt to change the eye color of his “patients” to blue to render them more Aryan. When these experiments went sideways, the fiendish M.D. demonstrated a penchant for “tidying up.” One person testified to having witnessed the diabolical doctor kill fourteen sets of twins in one night with chloroform injections to the heart in order to make comparative post-mortem observations.

After the Allies won the war, the Nuremberg Trials were convened to assess the astonishing breadth of the human tragedy as authored by Hitler and his henchmen and mete out punishment for their actions. The cruelty and depravity of Mengele and others, including Adolf Eichmann, shocked the world, were almost beyond reckoning, and subsequently inspired the establishment of the Nuremberg Code — which was tacitly endorsed by nearly every nation on earth.

The ten points of the Nuremberg Code for human experimentation are as follows:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the effects upon his health or person, which may come from his participation in the experiment.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

All COVID vaccines emergency authorized by the FDA have not yet been approved and are experimental, as they have undergone no long-term safety trials. Safety data are being partially collected in real time as adverse events are reported to VAERS. The tenets of the Nuremberg Code apply here as these vaccines are — by definition — a medical experiment being administered worldwide.

Given that, the explicit statement in #1 that subjects not be subject to coercion raises the question: does the threat of losing one’s job, not being able to attend college, or not being able to travel or attend a live event constitute coercion? Does the president of the United States urging Americans to “get the shot” and then threatening to send emissaries door to door to “encourage” it constitute coercion? Is it coercion to establish two Americas in which one half that chooses vaccination gets to eschew masks and move about freely, while the other half that doesn’t must stay masked and have their essential freedoms proscribed?

Later in #1, the text explicitly states that the subject must be made aware of “the effects upon his health or person.” This is known as informed consent: patients need to be made fully aware of the potential dangers of a medical procedure in keeping with the Hippocratic oath. There have been many reports of adverse events from the COVID vaccines, including Bell’s palsy, seizures, blood clotting, heart inflammation, and death. How many people reading this who got the vaccine had these potential side effects explained to them before getting jabbed? How many were afforded informed consent?

The second bullet point dictates the experiment (COVID vaccine) “should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation.” In an alarming break with decades of convention, the Pfizer and Moderna animal trials were run concurrently with human trials. The human trials were not a result of animal trials, giving the manufacturers a chance to make safety adjustments, which constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

The fifth bullet point states that no experiment (the experimental vaccine in this case) should be given if there’s reason to believe it could cause a disabling injury or death. With over 400,000 adverse events and 9,000 unconfirmed deaths from COVID vaccines reported to VAERS, is there reason to believe the COVID vaccines violate the Nuremberg Code in yet another way?

The eighth bullet point emphasizes the “highest degree of skill and care” by “scientifically qualified persons” when administering the vaccine. Do pharmacists fit that profile? Do school nurses? How about the folks jabbing people motoring through drive-thru clinics? Does the fact that they all enjoy total liability protection from vaccine injury and death give pause?

The last bullet point emphasizes that the administering agent should exercise caution in fulfillment of the Hippocratic oath by terminating treatment if there is reason to believe that further treatment could cause “injury, disability or death.” There are countless stories of people having an adverse reaction to the first of two shots — but being encouraged to continue with the second shot anyway. Many of these unfortunates suffered debilitating, lifelong injuries — or death — after the second vaccine. Meanwhile, instances of doctors or health care workers erring on the side of caution and advising against the second shot for these vulnerable patients are vanishingly rare.

It is increasingly clear that the powerful principles and precepts of the Nuremberg Code have been flouted, even decimated, by those seeking to push the COVID vaccines on every single person on Earth. Foremost among these is the caution against coercion. Those who resist the anti-American and anti-human idea of a one-size-fits-all medical treatment are freedom-fighters for the obvious and inherent right to choose for themselves. That this is no longer self-evident is deeply alarming.

It is a well-worn aphorism that those who forget their past are condemned to repeat it. Despite mounting evidence of serious adverse events and death, are we doing just that in our increasingly desperate attempts to use coercion to vaccinate absolutely everyone?

Are we nullifying the Nuremberg Code?

Pennel Bird is a writer, musician, educator, father, and husband. He likes piña coladas and getting caught in the rain.

Under the Cover of Covid 15,000 Wealthy Foreigners given Australian Visas! | COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE FOR NSW (CAAN): HOUSING INEQUALITY WITH AUSSIES LOCKED OUT!


DURING the Pandemic 15,000 wealthy foreigners have been given Australian Visas!

WE did tell you so!

Martin North, principal of property research firm Digital Finance Analytics, also notes ‘there’s been a swing away from foreigners looking to invest to people wanting to move here.’ And that they are more interested in buying land and larger properties!

Overseas Buyers are tipped to Return!


Little-known property investor quietly secures $32m housing parcel in Vaucluse


MEANWHILE tens of thousands of Australians remain stranded overseas!

This latest report:


IS this not the ultimate betrayal by the Morrison Government through its business innovation and investment visa programme?

Under these visas:

Business Innovation Stream applicants can buy or start a business, and have $1.25M in either business or personal assets

Investor stream, applicants have to be recommended by a state or territory agency and invest $2.5M on authorised investments

Significant investor stream, applicants must invest $5M, with a minumum $1M in venture capital or private equity

In September 2016 in its final report the Productivity Commission called for these visas to be scrapped because they are channels for money laundering!

WHY hasn’t there been a response from the Morrison Government to a public inquiry into “Migrant intake into Australia”?


With the ‘Significant Investor and Premium Investor Visas’

no English language requirements

no upper age limits

-a risk they might be an avenue for ‘dirty money’

Most business and investment immigrants are often older, buy retail and hospitality businesses, so how can this add to Australia’s innovative and entrepreneurial capacity?

View this AFR report about migration agents enabling Chinese investors to gain Significant Investment Visas!


HOW can this be of any benefit to the Australian people and our Nation with more competition to buy our businesses from overseas with ‘black money’?

AND even more competition for a limited supply of housing, and inadequate infrastructure as these VISAS allow ‘Permanent Residency,’ and the benefits of parking ‘their family’ in Australia as they can continue to run their business in another country?

These families have access to our MEDICARE, and FREE EDUCATION as their business is predominantly overseas!

WT ****!



It is easy to buy a University degree. Here is how.

It is easy to buy a University degree. Here is how.

by tonytran2015.

This is a revelation on why there are too many idiots having University degrees and higher degrees.

Their method is:

1. Pay to enroll in one of the institutions.

2. Buy the essays from the services below.

3. The source even advise that “Consult an expert advisor/health professional before any such purchase. Any purchase made from this link is subject to the final terms and conditions of the website’s selling as mentioned in the above as source.

This speaks so much for University degrees from those institutions.

Press release content from KISSPR. The AP news staff was not involved in its creation.

Top 4 Scholarship Essay Writing Services: Description, Differences and Benefits

April 1, 2021

03/31/2021, Orlando, FL // KISSPR //

In this article, we shall focus on the top 4 essay writing services of 2021, describing the differences and similarities. Below you will find the brief description and an in-depth review, when you scroll further down. Enjoy!
99Papers.com – is an online writing company offering professional high-quality writing assistance at a very affordable price. Quick facts:

Prices start at only $9.95 per page

Lowest prices for 2-3 days delivery time


Originality report and Copy of Sources available

Improve your order with additional premium features

Use the discount coupon ENJOYBIG to get extra 10% in rewards!

EssayBox.org – is one of the most popular top quality essays writing companies in the United States. Quick facts:

Prices start at $12 per page

Fastest delivery time is just 3 hours

Free content originality report with your first order (see below)

Use the discount coupon GETREPORT

BookwormLab.com – is a top-rated essay writing service trusted by university and college students for quality and reliability. Quick facts:

Prices start at $15 per page

99.8% On-Time delivery

Leading the essay market since 2008

Use the discount coupon BOOKEXTRA to earn extra Rewards!

EssayFactory.uk – is the best essay writing company for high school, university, and college students in the UK. Quick facts:

Prices start at $11.5 GBP per page

Professional British writers

100+ disciplines covered

Use the discount coupon SAVE10EF to get 10% in Credits towards the next order!

All companies help high school, college, and university students to write academic works and essays. Students use the service for speeches, projects, capstone courses, and lab reports, among others. They also provide discounts of up to 15% and only employ expert writers from native English-speaking countries. These companies have been on the market for years and only hire professionals to write, edit and proofread papers. Additionally, these companies assure their customers’ confidentiality and refund customers in case of double payments or delayed delivery.


A lot of customers prefer these companies because they provide free revision services in case any issues arise with an order. They provide high-quality writing services and plagiarism-free papers. Students prefer their services over their competitors because, if the need arises, these companies usually refund money if the client is even remotely dissatisfied with the results.
Top 4 Scholarship Essay Writing Services
With increased internet usage around the world, many companies have emerged offering scholarship essay writing services. Consequently, the question on most students’ minds is whether the company they are about to hire offers good quality. The answers to these questions depend on the site that a student selects. Most essay writing companies offer dissertation writing services combined with other academic papers. The majority of these sites have been tried and tested by experts in the writing industry.
It’s worth mentioning that not all essay writing companies out there are legit. Experts have discovered a number of companies operating without any permits, raising concerns about the credibility of such services overall. Students often leave reviews by providing feedback on a platform regarding the essay writing service on Reddit. Such information has been the key determinant for customers on whether or not to use a website. Students can suss out scammers based on the processes used to demand payments and the behavior of the scammer once they get paid.
Some illegitimate companies are in a rush to ask for the full payment without presenting the work requested and they start ghosting clients once they pay for a scholarship essay. Expert writing services, on the other hand, do not rush the payment process and often give the customers a refund if they are dissatisfied with the results. The current article provides some of the top 4 fully legit scholarship essay writing services that a student can select.
Scholarships are an opportunity to receive monetary assistance for a student’s educational journey. The demand for the program is, however, higher than the number of providers available. Consequently, a student must strive to stand out from the thousands of applicants seeking assistance, making scholarship writing companies highly desirable. However, an applicant must consider the quality of the work provided based on past reputation.

99Papers is probably the most reliable essay writing service that a student can hire.

The company has been in existence for a number of years and has received positive reviews from users.

Students continue to use its services, further illustrating its proficiency in the industry.

The company hires professional essay writers who deliver custom-made essays.

Some of the experts include individuals with PhDs and advanced degrees, English editing experience, and subject-matter expertise.

The scholarship essay writers are diligent and trustworthy here. They are truly the Answer to the popular demand of “find an essay writer near me”.

Plagiarism is one of the primary elements that limit the eligibility and reliability of a company offering scholarship essay writing services. With EssayBox students do not need to worry about copied content because the company provides quality original essays from scholarship essay writers.

The company has been in existence for several years and, therefore, the scholarship essay writers provide top-notch quality.

The legitimate essay writing service is also concerned about deadlines and so they use fast writing philosophy essay writers to achieve high deadlines.

Having operated in the industry for a number of years has given the English essay writers prowess to work on short deadlines.

The company also provided favorable prices with a refund guarantee.

Best essay writing service yahoo answers mentions the company as most efficient.

If a student is late in submitting his or her essay, they can present the work on EssayBox for quick and efficient service. The professionals are also experts in maintaining high safety and confidentiality for their clients to maintain good relationships with them. The majority of clients who use EssayBox make repeated orders with other subjects, including research papers, dissertation, nursing, and biology assignments among other complex units.
Scholarships are one of the most important pieces of the puzzle for a student with financial constraints and in need of quality education. BookwormLab is a legit essay writing service and they understand the requirements of a scholarship essay as well as the target audience. The company provides reliable scholarship essay writing services. Although students want quality scholarship essays, finances can be a huge limitation.

BookwormLab understands this challenge and provides quality services at affordable prices, in a quest to “buy essay”.

The company is popular among British, Canadian and American scholars. In case the need for revision arises, writers are always available to provide the required assistance.

The company is among the top scholarship essay writing services because it is highly flexible and offers a repayment method. In case a dispute arises and a writer fails to meet the requirements, BookwormLab refunds the client almost immediately.

There is simply no other writing company with a similarly swift refund process.

The name of the company speaks for itself. Clients seeking scholarship essay writing services receive the best quality at affordable prices. Once a writer pays for an essay, they can relax and wait to win the scholarship because EssayFactory is among the best writing services across the country and beyond.

The company provides users with a quality control mechanism to ensure clients receive essays according to the agreed instructions.

Students who pay for essays are assured legitimacy because the company hires the most reliable scholarship essay writers.

EssayFactory is one of the most recommended essay writing services online as a company offering perfect, genuine, and reliable writing services.

The team of expert writing professionals guides clients to the best writers and allows students to choose according to their preferences.

EssayFactory is a fast essay writing service and provides the best graduate scholarship essay through a 24/7 support team.

Mostly, students use the essay writing services to verify the suitability of a writing company in providing satisfactory graduate scholarship essay writing services.
Furthermore, a student might be unfamiliar with writing but need a quality paper to submit for their scholarship. In case an issue arises with the presented work, support is always available to assist students. The company has been reviewed severally as one of the best scholarship essay writing service providers, even for college and MBA scholarship essays. Therefore, a student cannot go wrong with a scholarship essay if they select EssayFactory.
Best Easy Writing Services in the United States
How it Works
99Papers is, probably, the best essay writing service in the United States, providing the best scholarship essay writing service to students who pay for scholarship essays. Students seeking MBA scholarship essay writing services in California can hire the company. Furthermore, the site is reliable for learners with no time to write a compelling paper for their college application. Writers are mainly high-level professionals from the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. The writers are highly effective with hands-on knowledge of a variety of subjects including lab reports, projects, capstones, and many more.
During service application, the company offers students with online forms they can use to fill in their details. The forms ask for information such as the type of paper, such as a scholarship essay writing service, best quality scholarship essay writing service, number of pages, format, and the time offered to finish the tasks.
Once the client fills in the information on the forms, a chat window pops up whereby a student fills in more instructions concerning the task, along with some essay writing tips. For example, if it is a college scholarship writing service, a client adds more data on the school’s name and the course they will study, among other details they would like included.
The writing process then begins and a client must wait until the agreed-upon deadline, but the paper can be submitted before that if the pool of expert writers finishes early. The company also provides additional services such as editing and proofreading to increase the quality of the content it presents to the client. Before offering the paper to the client, 99Papers normally uses Turnitin to check for any plagiarized content. Once the customer receives the paper, they can ask for a revision if dissatisfied with the results.
The company offers one of the most affordable prices for quality content written by expert application essay writers. If you are based in California and are looking for a legitimate essay writing company, 99Papers is a reliable essay writing service and is totally the way to go. The company provides custom essay writing at low prices to accommodate all types of learners. The college writing service provider uses the time provided to finish an application essay, and the complexity or simplicity of the document determines the exact price. They may also help to advise on how to make an essay longer, should the need arise (sometimes people are looking for this option as well).
However, clients offering papers for the first time have an added benefit apart from quality content. The individuals receive a 15% discount maximum.

Furthermore, loyal customers also receive a similar percentage back as a bonus. A page on this site goes for as low as $9.95, and the company has provided an online calculator to help the students navigate the exact price of a paper. In case of any mistakes and additional charges, the company also provides support 24/7 to handle such issues. Most consumers have tried and tested the company’s services and the majority agree that it is the best scholarship essay writing service. Others claim that based on the affordable prices for quality content, it is one of the best college scholarship essay writing services in the United States.


Every work has a deadline which in some cases motivates people to work. Most educators indicate the deadline for essays to be submitted and so do 99Papers. The company asks that customers indicate when they would like to receive their well-written essay. The quickest turnaround for submission is only three hours. However, clients are always considerate in allowing at least six hours to provide writers with ample time to work and submit quality content. The price goes high for the tasks with short deadlines because a writer has to deploy a lot of writing skills and a high speed to meet the time demand.

Some illegitimate writing companies deceive clients to pay for custom-made papers but fail to deliver on time. Contrarily, 99Papers is a trustworthy essay writing company and they adhere to their promises to clients by delivering documents by the agreed time. Various essay writing service reviews claim that the company is among the best college scholarship essay writing service providers that a student can hire due to its ability to finish quality essays on time. The majority of the papers are finished an hour before time, making the company the ultimate destination for essay writing service for college scholarship. Therefore, students looking for essay writers with affordable prices and reliable content should select 99Papers. It’s a quick essay writing service too.

Quality of the Writers

Have you been wondering how to start writing an essay? Well, worry no more because this company has some of the most effective writers working today. The company has a pool of expert writers holding PhDs, degrees in diverse subjects, and a ton of experience due to many years of writing in their respective fields. The company does not hire writers without experience, and they must pass several tests to qualify regardless of their level of education.

All the writers demonstrate discipline, a principle required in the writing industry. For example, a client may have missed some information while presenting essay materials and instructions. During such scenarios, the writers are highly disciplined to provide the client with timely feedback not to mess with the stipulated deadlines. The writers’ passion for helping students also illustrates their discipline and the need to present quality content. In case of revisions, the company’s writers are always ready to tackle them, regardless of the timeline provided. Moreover, a client might not present all the necessary materials to the instruction board.

However, that doesn’t stop the writers from presenting quality content that compels customers to come back for repeated services. The writers also perform their duties diligently without reporting the students to their universities. The concept has helped increase the company’s reliability over the years.

Guarantees and Revisions

The company provides an ideal guarantee policy that favors both the client and the writer. Firstly, the company checks for plagiarism before submitting a paper to determine its quality. In case a client receives a plagiarized paper, the company makes a full refund to the client within 24 hours. Additionally, if a document goes missing or the paper is submitted late, the client is given a full refund. In case the client makes a double payment unknowingly, the company refunds the full amount within 12 hours upon realization.

In case a student wishes to cancel an order in progress, the company does not refund the full amount but does refund a large portion if it. The refund occurs when a client asks for the refund after half the deadline has passed. If a paper has been delivered, then a client does not receive any refund if the document presented has no underlying issues. The refund works for approved orders only.

The company has a revision policy that favors both clients and writers. In case the writer misses information written on the description box, then he or she is bound to revise the order upon the client’s request. The top rated essay writers understand the policy and they have been highly reliable with minimal revision cases. However, if a client does not provide information, he or she cannot ask for revision services unless they are paid for. This policy has helped maintain an atmosphere of fairness in the company and increase client satisfaction in the long run and improve the essay writing process overall. Consequently, a student looking for a writing service company with an understanding of the industry, quality essay writing prompts and experienced writers (not mentioning being one of the most affordable essay writing services) in the United States should choose 99Papers.


The positive feedback from the company’s clients speaks for itself (even if a person is a good essay typer themselves). The company provides highly reliable content free from plagiarism, which is a major concern among writing companies. The professional editors, proofreaders, and writers also have verified academic backgrounds. The company provides clients with 24/7 support to solve issues that may arise and also serve clients with urgent orders. Additionally, students maintain their confidentiality; the company has mechanisms in place that enable the clients to remain anonymous. Students can use the service from any location without being disclosed.

The company has never had any trust issues or potential data breaches that may expose the students to using its services. The majority of the clients that have used the service have come back for more assistance with assignments. Others have attended their dream colleges after using scholarship essays from the company. The company understands the need to protect both writers and the students and the information is highly secured and, therefore, a learner can use it without any worry. The organization’s reputation indeed speaks for itself.

The Legitimacy

This company is absolutely legitimate since it has been on the market for more than ten years. The clients’ reviews on its website also illustrate its legitimacy as most have acquired their stipulated grades while others have been admitted to their preferred higher education institutions. Furthermore, the organization hires highly reputable and knowledgeable writers with quality academic backgrounds to assist the students. Hence their experience in writing increases the legitimacy of the writing company.

Where to Find a Professional Essay Writer?

The demand for professional academics, researchers, and essay writers continue to rise. Lots of people are searching for the essay help nowadays. Some are taking advantage of the demand to steal from students, destroying the reputation of the writing industry. Despite these pitfalls, reliable and legitimate companies exist to help students with learning difficulties achieve higher grades. The concept behind the writing services is to also help students who are preoccupied with numerous tasks and cannot find time to complete their papers find time to work on their chores and succeed in academics on various essay writing topics. To summarize, students can find expert essay writers at the following websites:


Wondering how to go about your essay in a professional manner from start to finish? Well, there are many essay writing sites out there, but 99Papers, the top essay writing service in 2021, has go …

We got the bill for having a baby – $37,000. Welcome to life in America

Last week the hospital bill finally came. The cost of an uncomplicated vaginal birth? $37,617.69. The bulk of the charge was for three nights’ “room and board” in a semi-private room (containing two beds separated by a curtain) which was $10,350 a night. Our health insurance covers about $31,000 – leaving us with a balance…

Apple removes dating app for the unvaccinated Unjected for trying to ‘cheat the system,’ as its creators cry ‘CENSORSHIP!’ — RT USA News


Apple has removed the dating app Unjected, marketed as a “safe space” for unvaccinated Americans, from its store, saying it “inappropriately refers to the Covid-19 pandemic.” The app’s developers say this amounts to censorship.

Unjected describes itself as a “platform for like-minded humans that support medical autonomy.” The dating app has been pitched as a ‘safe space’ of sorts for unvaccinated Americans looking to date without the pressure of being or not being inoculated against Covid-19. Critics, however, have viewed the app as a growing social-media platform for anti-vaxxers and a hotspot of Covid misinformation.

After the app was removed from Apple on Saturday, the company blasted the move as “censorship.”

“Apparently, we’re considered ‘too much’ for sharing our medical autonomy and freedom of choice,” the company said in a Saturday statement posted to Instagram.

ALSO ON RT.COM‘Tinder for antivaxers’? Unjected dating app to create ‘safe space’ for Covid-unvaccinated users

The app remains on the Google Play store, but they acknowledge that the move by Apple may mean a website may be Unjected’s best option moving forward so that they are not reliant on app stores.

Other dating apps such as Tinder and Bumble have introduced features to encourage vaccinations, making Unjected stand out even more after launching in May.

But the boiling point for the platforms was reached after Unjected added a social feature that allowed more general postings. It was flagged by Google after Unjected’s moderators were accused of not doing enough to police misinformation on Covid-19 and the vaccines available.

In response to Google’s concerns, the social feed was removed, though co-founder Shelby Thompson wants to soon reintroduce it and the flagged posts.

“We’ve had to walk a censorship tightrope,” she said, according to Bloomberg News, which first reported Apple removed Unjected on Saturday after being contacted by a reporter about the app.

The app also includes lists of businesses that disagree with vaccine mandates.

Apple has already had issues with Unjected, initially denying approval for the app during its initial review process. Changes had to be made for it to get approval to be in compliance with the company’s strict policy on Covid-19 “misinformation,” but a spokesperson for Apple said updates to the app, as well as statements made to its thousands of users, have brought it back out of compliance.

ALSO ON RT.COMDonald Trump Jr. jokingly suggests #VaxtoVote mandate, claps back at liberals who LOVE the idea

“The developer has made statements externally to its users as well as updates to the app that once again bring it out of compliance,” the spokesperson said.

Apple argued that, because some phrases and words were initially flagged by the company in the app’s social feature, Unjected users began using different placeholder words and phrases to essentially promote the same conspiracy theories about Covid-19 vaccines.

The new decision makes clear, the company said, that “if you attempt to cheat our system, your apps will be removed from the store.”

Thompson maintains, however, that Apple is merely looking for an excuse to censor Unjected, and even says the removal “violates our constitutional rights.”

Climate Change: An Excuse For Political Incompetence | PA Pundits – International


By Dr. John Happs

Climate change received little or no mention by the media or politicians during the inundation of Queensland floodplains in 1974:

After this event, houses were rebuilt only to suffer later flooding. There were floodplain inundations in Queensland during 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The more recent floods were met, not with expressions of regret for allowing building to continue in these areas, but with the anticipated cries of “global warming” and “climate change” from the media, green zealots and politicians….