“Americans Are Tired Of All The Lies” – General Mike Flynn Warns Nation Being Overtaken By Small, Powerful Group Of Marxists

“Americans Are Tired Of All The Lies” – General Mike Flynn Warns Nation Being Overtaken By Small, Powerful Group Of Marxists Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com, Retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), thinks evil communists are out to destroy America and your freedom. General Flynn explains, “Transitioning to all […]

Epstein: They Knew Everything And Did Nothing



According to Alex Acosta, the former US Attorney who signed the NPA, he was instructed to back off the case because Epstein was above his pay grade. Acosta supposedly told Trump transition officials that “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.”

And who gave Acosta those instructions to leave Epstein alone? A good starting point might be those federal officials identified in this article.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 08/11/2021 – 19:40

Former CDC Director Says He Was ‘Sidelined’ And ‘Threatened’ After He Took COVID Lab Leak Theory Seriously — LifeZette | Truth2Freedom’s Blog


On Monday, former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield said that when he began to take the lab leak theory seriously at the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic, he was “sidelined” and “threatened.”

Redfield made his comments during an interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum.

Redfield Claims He Was ‘Threatened’

In January of 2020, two of the most bandied about theories on COVID-19 were that it might have jumped species or leaked from a laboratory.

Redfield said that he believed the evidence supported the theory that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab.

“I think what you have seen over the last 18 months is no new evidence to suggest that this evolved from nature,” Redfield told MacCallum.

“Haven’t seen any evidence of it being associated with any of the animal species they’ve tested, over 80,000 animals,” he explained. “But we have seen growing evidence to support that this in fact was a consequence of a laboratory leak.”

Redfield added, “So I continue to believe of the two hypotheses that the laboratory leak is the most likely origin of this virus.”

Redfield said the virus potentially being caused by science and not nature was “in a way tragic.”

“And I think I’m very disheartened when I have seen how the scientific community failed to approach both hypotheses with an open mind,” the former CDC director said.

Refiled added, “I mean I was very rapidly sidelined, threatened and really sort of outed because I believed as a virologist that this virus may have come from the laboratory.”

Redfield Said He Was Threatened By Other Scientists For Espousing Lab Leak Theory

This isn’t the first time Redfield has talked about the consequences of his belief.

In June, Redfield said that he received death threats from fellow scientists.

Why? Because he dared voice support for the lab leak theory.

Vanity Fair reported, “After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends.”

Redfield was floored by what has happening, saying, “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis. I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.”

This piece originally appeared in ThePoliticalInsider.comand is used by permission.

Former CDC Director Says He Was ‘Sidelined’ And ‘Threatened’ After He Took COVID Lab Leak Theory Seriously — LifeZette

Democrats Plead Guilty to Crimes Against Trump Supporters in Delaware


Two women plead guilty to crime against Trump supporters https://nypost.com/2021/08/05/women-plead-guilty-to-hate-crime-for-attacking-trump-supporters/ One police spokesperson said the protesters were deliberate in their efforts to trap officers inside the East Precinct https://komonews.com/news/local/police-spokesperson-accuses-rioters-of-attempted-murder-for-trying-to-barricade-officers The operatives were heard

USS Liberty Lawsuit Reveals US Gov’t. Withholding Hundreds of Pages about Deadly 1967 Israeli Attack (Guest Post) – Station HYPO


By Michelle Kinnucan

An ongoing federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveals the US government is refusing to release at least 302 pages of documents concerning an unprovoked attack 54 years ago on an American ship, the USS Liberty (AGTR-5).

In a March 10, 2012, letter Pamela N. Phillips, the chief of the National Security Agency’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) section told Joe Meadors: “The National Security Agency (NSA) finalized the review of all material relative to the attack on the USS Liberty and made it available on the Internet.” Ms. Phillips continued: “… any future requests made by you concerning this topic will be filed with your previous FOIA case with no further action by this Agency.”1

Joe Meadors is a persistent researcher on the attack on USS Liberty (AGTR-5). As many Station HYPO readers will know, on June 8, 1967, an attack by Israeli air and naval forces on Liberty killed 34 Americans and injured over 170. Liberty is “the most highly decorated ship … for a single action” in US Navy history.2Meadors knows all about this because he was among the wounded on that day of storied heroism in the face of infamous treachery.

About seven years after a government bureaucrat essentially told Joe Meadors to shut up and sit down I filed my own FOIA requests with the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Months passed and the government produced not a single record I requested.

Fortunately, I was able to obtain the services of an excellent team of attorneys from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. The attorneys, Thomas Burke, Caesar Kalinowski, and Allexia Arnold, are not only top-notch lawyers but they’re great people to work with and on September 1, 2020, Kinnucan v. National Security Agency et al., (no. 2:20-cv-01309) was filed in the US District Court in Seattle.

That lawsuit is still in its early stages but it has already helped reveal that the US government is refusing to release at least 302 pages of documents concerning the attack. Documents still being withheld from Liberty survivors, widows, other kin of the deceased, and the American public include a two-volume 1967 US House of Representative Appropriations Committee report—containing at least 126 pages—in NSA custody. This, of course, demonstrates that contrary to Ms. Phillips, the NSA has not made available “all material relative to the attack on the USS Liberty”.

According to investigative journalist Stephen Green, the late Robert L. F. Sikes, who was an Appropriations Committee member, said the report I requested contains testimony from a CIA witness that on June 7, 1967, the Israeli government threatened to attack Liberty if she was not moved away from Israel.3Green also claimed: “The information provided by Representative Sikes has been corroborated by other committee sources who do not wish to be identified”.4Ostensibly, the NSA is withholding the report at the direction of Congress.

The alleged Israeli threat to attack Liberty was purportedly relayed via a June 7, 1967, cable from the US Defense Attaché in Tel Aviv to the Pentagon.5 I asked the DIA for “All communications and message traffic to or from the Office of Defense Attaché in Israel from June 5, 1967 to June 10, 1967.” The DIA says they have no responsive records.

In the NSA’s A History of U.S. Communications Security: The David G. Boak Lectures, vol. II, it says: “Since those days [1957], no less than 32 … U.S. facilities (embassies, legations, missions) containing crypto-equipment have come under attack, 13 of them during the 6 Day War in the Middle East …” I asked the NSA for records pertaining to the 13 attacks during the 1967 war and for the “Encrypted Traffic Reports … of the USS Little Rock (CLG-4) for the months of May, June, and July of 1967 and/or any analyses or reports that may aggregate or summarize the data/information contained in those reports.” The NSA claims they have no responsive records.

Earlier this year, the CIA released three one-page information reports from June and October of 1967.6 These reports were first released with redactions in the 1970s. Copies obtained by the present lawsuit reveal significant new source information. According to these reports, sources in Tel Aviv stated: “Israel’s forces knew exactly what flag the LIBERTY was flying” and Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan “personally ordered the attack” on Liberty over the objections of senior military officers, one of whom characterized the attack as “pure murder”.

In 1977, CIA Director Turner went on national television and emphasized that these three reports were “raw intelligence”. He quickly shifted the focus away from them onto an “evaluated overall document”.7 A day after Turner’s television appearance Alan D. Wolfe, then the CIA’s Chief of the Near East Division in the Directorate of Operations, commented that the three information reports were “raw reports which in historical hindsight were garbage, but which appeared worthy of dissemination at the time.”8

In available records, Wolfe does not explain on what basis the reports went from “worthy of dissemination” to “garbage.” As an aside, Wolfe was formally reprimanded for his role in the Aldrich Ames spy scandal. In the 1980s, Ames was a Soviet KGB double agent while working as a CIA counterintelligence officer in Rome where Wolfe was then the CIA Station Chief.

In any case, Wolfe also indicates that the “evaluated overall document” Turner cited was an intelligence memorandum dated June 13, 1967. That memo is one of the documents the CIA released to me.9 It does not mention or evaluate the three reports implicating Israeli officials in a knowing attack on Liberty. It could not because it was prepared before the earliest distribution date—June 23, 1967—of the three information reports.

So, in front of a national audience, Turner invoked a memo that he knew had nothing to say about the three reports he and Wolfe dismissed as mere “raw” intelligence. In fact, one of those “raw” reports was more accurate than CIA analysis at the time.

The memo Turner and Wolfe cited claimed there: “was little doubt that the Israelis failed to identify the Liberty as a US ship before or during the attack.”10 The second of the three information reports contained intelligence from a US citizen working for an American newspaper. The source claimed that “Around 10-11 June while in Tel Aviv I talked with an Israeli …” The Israeli reportedly made it clear the attack on Liberty was no mistake and accurately “implied that the ship’s identity was known at least six hours before the attack …”11

From the CIA, I also requested “records pertaining to the response, analysis, evaluation of, and/or decision not to evaluate, the 1967 CIA ‘Information Report’ ” implicating Dayan. None of the documents provided so far by the CIA mention or evaluate the three reports implicating Israeli officials in a knowing attack on Liberty nor do any of them reference the alleged June 7, 1967, cable from the Defense Attaché in Tel Aviv.

However, the CIA admits they are withholding in their entirety three other documents totaling 173 pages. The CIA had never before publicly acknowledged the existence of these documents. Based on timing, two of the three documents the CIA refuses to release could conceivably include evaluations of one or two of the three information reports. The CIA describes each of the two documents as an “Internal Document Prepared for the Purpose of Providing a Briefing on Several Topics”.

If you look into the Israeli attack on Liberty you will quickly encounter claims that the attack has been investigated multiple times by the US government, which, it is claimed, always found the attack was a tragic case of mistaken identity. In fact, following the 1967 attack, the US Navy undertook a hasty and incomplete Naval Court of Inquiry (NCOI) that found: “Available evidence combines to indicate the attack on LIBERTY on 8 June was in fact a case of mistaken identity.”12

However, the June 28, 1967, Defense Department public summary of proceedings of the inquiry into the attack stated: “It was not the responsibility of the Court to rule on the culpability of the attackers and no evidence was heard from the attacking nation”.13 In 2005, the Navy’s Office of the Judge Advocate General told a member of Congress that: “The Court of Inquiry was the only United States Government investigation into the attack.”14

Many of Liberty’s surviving crew dispute the claim of mistaken identity. Over the years they have been joined in that by American officials including Richard Helms (Director of Central Intelligence, 1966-1973), Lieut. Gen. Marshall S. Carter (Director of the NSA, 1965-1969), Captain Ward Boston, Jr., JAGC (legal counsel for the 1967 NCOI), and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas H. Moorer.15, 16

Perhaps all the relevant evidence, when properly analyzed in context, supports the mistaken identity conclusion. However, if the evidence supports that hypothesis then why, after more than five decades, is the US government still refusing to release more than 300 pages of records relevant to understanding the deadly attack? And what other relevant records are they withholding that we don’t even know about? Hopefully, Kinnucan v. National Security Agency et al. will pry some of these records loose and bring others to light.


1. US National Security Agency, FOIA/PA Office, “Letter from Pamela N. Phillips to Joe Meadors”, March 10, 2012. Online at <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/audio-tapes-of-june-8-1967-attack-on-the-uss-liberty-1086/#file-4342&gt; .

2. Anthony R. Wells, A Tale of Two Navies: Geopolitics, Technology, and Strategy in the United States Navy and the Royal Navy, 1960-2015 (Naval Inst. Pr., 2017) p. 82.

3. Sikes as cited in Stephen Green, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel (Morrow & Co., 1984) p. 239, see also pp. 215, 226.

4. See Green, p. 275, n. 48.

5. See Green, pp. 226, 239.

6. The CIA’s document IDs for these records are: C01286836, C06140175, and C06140176. You can download these reports and other documents, including case pleadings, from: <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>https://spaces.hightail.com/space/oMuiiUFaID&gt; .

7. American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Good Morning America, September 19, 1977.

8. Harriet Dashiell Schwar, ed., “516. Editorial Note”, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XIX, Arab-Israeli Crisis and War, 1967, Edward C. Keefer, series ed. (Washington, DC: US GPO, 2004) pp. 1016-1017. The CIA has has neither released nor acknowledged the three CIA records referenced in Document 516.

9. The CIA’s document ID for this record is C01218180.

10. See CIA document C01218180, p. 3.

11. See CIA document C06140176.

12. US Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, “Record of Proceedings, Court of Inquiry to Inquire into the Circumstances Surrounding the Armed Attack on USS LIBERTY (AGTR-5) on 8 June 1967” pp. 161. The entire NCOI record for the Liberty attack is available at: <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>https://www.jag.navy.mil/library/jagman_investigations.htm&gt; The page quoted is included in Part 6 at <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>https://www.jag.navy.mil/library/investigations/LIBERTY%20ATTACK%20PT%206.pdf&gt; .

13. Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs), “News Release No. 594-67”, June 28, 1967, US Naval History and Heritage Command, Box 913 of the Immediate Office Files of the Chief of Naval Operations: 1960-1969.

14. US Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, “Letter from Jane G. Dalton, Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, to the Hon. Rob Simmons” (5890 Ser 15.151.A1/0198), March 16, 2005, Robert R. Simmons Papers, Archives and Special Collections, University of Connecticut Library, Storrs, CT.

15. American Legion,”Resolution No. 40: USS Liberty“, Proceedings of the 99th National Convention of the American Legion, US House of Representatives Doc. 115-91 (US GPO, 2018) pp. 124-125.

16. Rep. John Conyers, “In Recognition of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer”, Congressional Record 150:130 (Oct. 11, 2011) pp. E1886-E1889.


Michelle Kinnucan is an honorably discharged US Coast Guard and Army veteran and an honorary crewmember of the USS Liberty Veterans Association. She is also an independent researcher whose writing has appeared in PS: Political Science and Politics, Common Dreams, Critical Moment, Palestine Chronicle, Arab American News, and elsewhere. Her 2004 investigative report on the Global Intelligence Working Group was featured in Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Seven Stories Pr., 2004) and she contributed a chapter to Finding the Force of the Star Wars Franchise (Peter Lang, 2006).

Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four Times Is…. – Freedom Is Just Another Word…


Nothing to see here!!! Move along!!

The Armed Christian

So far, four DC Metro police officers who responded to the Capital protests on January 6th has committed suicide. That’s four officers involved in the operation who have committed suicide in the last seven months.

As Ian Fleming famously said:

Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.

Is four times a cover up? Could be

Stay alert, stay prepared and stay safe.

God bless.

View original post

Chinese scientist filed COVID vaccine patent after contagion emerged: report


Zhou Yusen, a decorated military scientist for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) …, filed a patent on Feb. 24 2020, according to documents obtained by The Australian.

The patent — lodged by the “Institute of Military Medicine, Academy

of Military Sciences of the PLA” — was filed just five weeks after China
admitted there was human-to-human transmission of the virus, and months
before Zhou died under mysterious circumstances, the report noted.

… Prof. Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University told the paper.

… something being looked into as part of the international investigation ordered by President Biden, the paper insisted…

Disband the FBI, by Chris Farrell | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC


The FBI is on its way to becoming the Democratic Party’s Gestapo. From Chris Farrell at gatestoneinstitute.org:

  • In the past few days alone, we have learned that the October 2020 Michigan governor kidnap plot was largely a creation of the FBI; a “senior FBI official” was on the take from media organizations; and another assistant director was in a “romantic relationship with a subordinate” and involved in “other misconduct.” The leadership failures documented by the Office of the Inspector General are now almost standard and part of a tiresome media drip-torture for the public to endure.
  • The FBI ran a coup against President Trump. It failed. The following got away: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, Pientka, Brower, Baker, et al. Any real consequences for attempting to overthrow the government of the United States? No.
  • Questions are now being raised as to whether the FBI had a role in the Capitol Hill protests of January 6, 2021. When one examines the FBI’s involvement in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses; standing by idly while in possession of Hunter Biden’s Ukraine and Burisma-laden laptops, while President Trump endured a second phony impeachment; and the frame-up of Trump’s National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – it is not too difficult to imagine.
  • The FBI needs to go away. It should happen in an orderly and thoughtful process, over a period of months. Congress should authorize and create an investigative division in the U.S. Marshals Service and open applications for law enforcement officer seeking to be rigorously screened, vetted and then accessed into the new organization. Similar action was taken before in the very creation of the FBI. It is now time to clean house and restore the public’s trust in the “premier investigative agency” of federal law enforcement.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) continues its downward spiral into terminal corruption. Sadly, the scandals, criminality and ethical abuses of the organization are largely ignored by the American public and by the institutions of government charged with oversight and correction. Outrage after outrage is reported, hearings are held, Inspector General reports are issued — but the systemic corruption is never really tackled and dirty cops skate away virtually unscathed.

Continue reading→

New Emails Shed More Light on Fauci’s Connections to Wuhan Lab | ukgovernmentwatch


13 July 2021

I mean, there’s a reason why no one wants to talk about it. The truth cannot be contained, however. Comedians are talking about it. Not even they can deny what’s going on given the developments on this front. The experts say it cannot be overlooked, some have already gone out and said that it looks very likely that the COVID pandemic arose because Chinese researchers, for lack of a better term, released the virus. Was it an accident? Who knows? But it’s becoming clearer by the day that this was a lab leak. Three lab staffers became ill with COVID-like symptoms last November, a month before the lab destroyed samples. The Chinese asked the National Institutes of Health to delete key gene data on COVID from their databases back in June of 2020. And studies are now showing that this was a man-made pathogen. There’s evidence of retro-engineering so China could say that it came from bats. Dr. Anthony Fauci has been at the center of this since he’s involved in the grant system that funded this whole circus.