US mother accuses school board of teaching her daughter she was ‘BORN EVIL’ because she is WHITE — RT USA News

The Virginia school board at the center of a row over its
gender-affirmation policies and alleged critical race theory (CRT)
curriculum has been accused by a parent of teaching primary schoolers
that white people are “born evil.”
At a Loudoun County School
Board meeting last week, a mother revealed that she had pulled her
children from the county’s public school system after her six-year-old
daughter asked her last year if she was “born evil because she was a white person.” The child had apparently learned this in a history lesson taught at her former school.

of the incident was widely shared over the weekend. It showed the
unidentified woman accusing the Loudoun County Public School (LCPS)
board of allegedly forcing its “uncompromising political agenda” on parents. Claiming that the board was “[destroying] our schools,” she called on its members to resign over a series of recent scandals.

the last month, the national spotlight has been trained on Loudoun
County after school administrators reportedly covered up a sexual
assault by a supposedly ‘gender-fluid’ student. The unnamed “boy in a skirt”
was convicted last week of forcible sodomy and forcible fellatio in
relation to the rape of a teenage girl at Stone Bridge High School in
May. While that incident was being investigated, he was quietly
transferred to Broad Run High School, where he allegedly assaulted
another student on October 6.

In August, the LCPS board enforced
policy proposal 8040 – a directive that requires district schools to
affirm the preferred gender of students by calling them their chosen
pronouns and allowing them access to gender-restricted areas, such as
locker rooms and bathrooms.

Last week, students at Broad Run staged a walkout to protest the school board’s policy as “enabling” behavior. At a previous school board meeting last month, an angry parent said the policy was “rushed through to a vote without consideration for the safety of all students, simply to satisfy a liberal agenda.”

Also on
Loudoun County ‘boy in a skirt’ found GUILTY of girls’ bathroom sex assault as school boards’ actions trigger walkouts

A series of contentious school meetings in recent months has laid
bare the tensions surrounding the policy, which has seen at least one
teacher resign after refusing to “push highly politicized agendas”
on students. Another teacher who refused to abide by the policy on
account of his religious beliefs was suspended by the board, but a court
later ordered his reinstatement on First Amendment grounds.

the National School Board Association (NSBA) appeared to smear the
first victim’s family and other concerned parents as “domestic terrorists”
in a controversial letter to the White House that requested FBI
involvement after alleged threats to LCPS board members. After criticism
from some 20 state school board associations, the NSBA partially
apologized for the letter, blaming renegade leaders and expressing
remorse at “some of the language” it used.

But the debate
over schooling in Loudoun County is not limited to trans issues.
Critics of the board are accusing it of adopting ideology-driven
agendas, like shaping the curriculum in line with CRT. The LCPS board
has denied embracing the highly controversial view of American history
and society, which states that the country was founded on
institutionalized racism that needs to be dismantled.

school board member Beth Barts is expected to step down on Tuesday,
after announcing her resignation last month, parents and other critics
have repeatedly called on LCPS Superintendent Scott Ziegler to resign.

May, Ziegler emailed the school board about the sexual assault at Stone
Bridge High School, but claimed at a June school board meeting that the
“predator transgender student or person simply does not exist” and that there was not “any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.” He later apologized but insisted there was no cover-up.

Also on
Parents want Loudoun
County, Va. school board to quit after accusation it covered up bathroom
rape by ‘gender-fluid sex predator’

Raising Awareness of Israeli War Crimes, with Palestine Action – muunyayo


October 30th, 2021

By Lowkey


“We’re not breaking the law; what we’re doing is actually rooted in law; it is a lawful act to do something to prevent the greater crime — to act to save lives.” — Huda Ammori, Palestine Action

Earlier this week, rapper Lowkey joined campaigners on the streets of Oldham as they protested at the Elbit Ferranti weapons factory located in the northern English town.

While the post-industrial town of 96,000 people might not seem like a likely flashpoint for the Israel-Palestine conflict, many of the weapons used against the civilian Palestinian population are actually manufactured there by the Israeli arms corporation.

In this interview, Lowkey…

View original post 444 more words

The Latest Spy Story: Was It Involving Israel Yet Again? | Aletho News

By Philip Giraldi | Strategic Culture Foundation | October 21, 2021

An intriguing though fragmentary espionage story made headlines eleven days ago and then disappeared abruptly, suggesting that some folks in high places in the government and media were fearing that the full tale would prove to be embarrassing to someone. I am referring to the report of the arrest made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service of an American government employee who worked in nuclear engineering. Jonathan Toebbe and his wife Diana apparently had stolen highly sensitive information on nuclear propulsion systems and the stealth hull designs of the next generation U.S. Navy Virginia class attack submarine fleet and had been caught after several times seeking to sell their wares to what they thought to be a foreign power.

Two days after the arrest, the Toebbes appeared in court in Martinsburg West Virginia and were ordered to remain in jail as they were considered a flight risk. So far, so good but the interesting part of the story is that the intended purchaser was apparently not obvious adversaries like Russia and China, but rather an ostensibly friendly country, which was not identified. The Toebbes clearly thought they were offering their technology to a foreign country’s intelligence service, one presumes, but they were in fact in contact with the FBI, which allowed them to arrange dead drops in Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia and paid them to continue providing new material on small digital computer cards before closing the trap and making the arrest.

And how the FBI learned about the Toebbes is another interesting part of the story. Apparently in April 2020 the couple had mailed a package containing manuals and other material relating to the propulsion systems to a foreign country, together with an offer to establish a covert relationship in return for payment in cryptocurrency. The package somehow wound up in someone’s hands in the foreign postal system or government and eventually made its way anonymously eight months later to the FBI legal attaché at the U.S. Embassy. It included a note that read “Please forward this letter to your military intelligence agency. I believe this information will be of great value to your nation. This is not a hoax.”

One has to suspect that the material actually had reached the foreign intelligence agency that it had been sent to where it was considered too hot to handle, so it was forwarded on to the U.S. officials anonymously to get rid of it.

The documents involved relating to the arrest and the alleged crimes committed by the Toebbes are heavily redacted, far beyond the identity of the foreign country involved, so it is somewhat difficult to reconstruct exactly what happened. Toebbe, a former naval officer, has held senior positions in the Navy bureaucracy, up to and including serving on the staff of the Chief of Naval Operations, which would have given him access to beyond top secret codeworded details of next level submarine technology. It is information that is only shared with Great Britain and, in a recent policy move, with Australia, both U.S. allies that will deploy nuclear powered submarines in the Pacific to deter China. The documents the Toebbes reportedly stole and tried to sell were produced by a little-known U.S. government facility the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory in West Mifflin Pennsylvania.

One of the most interesting aspects of the case is the question of who might have been the potential buyer of the stolen technology. Building nuclear submarines is not exactly high on the priority list of any but a small handful of countries that have global or regional pretensions that might be supported by having cruise missile nuclear weapons capable ships that can stay under water for months at a time. Germany could conceivably build such vessels but has no defensive needs that require such an expedient. So could France, presumably. Japan and South Korea are perhaps more plausible recipients, particularly as they have the industrial and scientific bases that could benefit from and use the technology if they chose to go that route, and both are threatened by China.

And, of course, there is always Israel, which frequently tends to come up when there are stories of espionage committed by a friendly country against the United States. In this case, of course, the Israelis, if targeted by the Toebbes, apparently did not seek the approach and that may be why the information sent in the package possibly to Mossad was sat on for over six months. Nevertheless, there is a definite resemblance to what the Toebbes set out to do with the Jonathan Pollard case of the 1980s. Pollard, a non-practicing Jew and Navy analyst, stole a whole roomful of top-secret defense materials. He was in it for the money and tried to sell the intelligence to several foreign governments before he “got religion” and found a buyer in Israel. He became the most damaging spy in the history of the United States. After being caught, tried, convicted and spending twenty-eight years in federal prison, he was released on parole but not allowed to travel. The Donald Trump administration did not renew the parole in 2020 and he moved to Israel, where he was met at the airport by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who presented him with his citizenship papers. He is regarded as a hero in Israel and he has a city square named after him. So, the question becomes, was history repeating itself with the Toebbes?

Against that speculation is the fact that Israel already has an established nuclear deterrent more than capable of eliminating its regional enemies if needs be. It has no use for an expensive submarine with abilities that are not required in the goldfish bowl of the Middle East, unless of course if the United States were to gift Jerusalem with such a new military bauble. It would also have no need to get involved in something that might ultimately have tremendous blowback if exposed, potentially severely damaging the relationship with Washington.

My own theory is that Israel was indeed the target of the Toebbes’ scheme. It is widely known that the Jewish state is the most aggressive and successful “friendly” nation spying on Washington and it is backed up by a host of wealthy and powerful co-religionists who work hard to both “help” it and cover-up for its crimes. I suspect that if Israeli intelligence were interested in collecting on the submarine technology they would eschew potential screwballs like the Toebbes and instead work their other sources in Washington to collect the information independently, accounting for the time lag between the mailing of the package and the forwarding of it to the FBI. When Pollard was active, his Israeli Embassy handler would sometimes ask him for specific files by number, indicating they had other high level agents at work, and it must be assumed that that is still the case. Far too many in Congress and the Pentagon are very happy to have a lunch with that nice young man or woman from the Israeli Embassy and maybe share a secret or two.

But, that speculation aside, perhaps the strongest indicator that Israel was the planned recipient of what the Toebbe’s stole is the silence over who the target might have been. When the media and the federal government are silent on a foreign policy or national security issue it often means that Israel is involved, directly or indirectly. Will we the American public ever learn “who was it?” Probably not. Just one more secret.

Gender gestapo celebrate win as tin-eared UK judges overturn ban on puberty blockers for under-16s who need help, not hormones — RT Op-ed

Damian Wilson is a UK journalist, ex-Fleet Street editor, financial industry consultant and political communications special advisor in the UK and EU.
A UK Court of Appeal decision to allow young teenagers to decide
on the first stage of gender transitioning is a blow for common sense, a
gross misreading of the public mood and an insult to every parent.
A 13-year-old child is
only just old enough to open their own account on Twitter, Instagram or
TikTok, but now the Court of Appeal in the UK has decided
they’re also of an age to decide on taking powerful puberty blockers as
they make up their mind whether they want to face the future as a man
or woman.

So let’s get this straight. In their first year of
becoming a teenager, they can’t drink, drive, vote, or have sex, but
they can make the decision to take growth-inhibiting hormones that will
delay the onset of puberty, with all the physical and mental impact that
means, while their school pals and peers embark on a prescription-free
path into a regular adulthood.

Also on
A new book, ‘The Transgender Issue’, is a tale of rampant victimhood that views straight white people as reactionary oddities

For reasons hard to fathom, the Court of Appeal has overturned a ruling made in the High Court just last December that determined children under the age of 13 considering gender reassignment were “highly unlikely”
to be mature enough to themselves give informed consent to be
prescribed puberty-blocking drugs, which it called an ‘experimental’
treatment that even those aged 14 or 15 would have difficulty
understanding. They even suggested that the doctors of teenagers under
18 may need to consult the courts for authorisation for medical

As a result of that decision Tavistock suspended new
referrals for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for under-16s.
But now that’s all changed, in less than a year.

The court
decision announced today follows the launch of an appeal by Tavistock
and Portman NHS foundation trust, which, as NHS England’s only gender
identity development service for children, has the most skin in the
game. They disputed the outcome of the case brought against them by
24-year-old Keira Bell, who began taking puberty blockers at 16 but
later de-transitioned.

believes 16 is too young an age to make such a life-changing decision,
let alone ages 15, 14 or 13. Keira’s case was backed by the unnamed
mother of a teenage autistic girl on the waiting list for treatment. In
some circles, autistic teens are considered more prone to gender
dysphoria than neurotypical kids. But it’s just a theory, that’s all.

Gender dypsphoria – described by the NHS as “a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity”
– is at the centre of all this. While any responsible parent or
qualified medical specialist would probably want to explore the whys and
wherefores of a child’s desire to transition their sex, it seems that
judges are happy for children to self-diagnose, and leave the medical
experts to inject the GnRH analogues based on their young patient’s

Also on
Trans activists will HATE Helen Joyce’s shocking new book as it dismantles their false ideology piece by piece

Last December, the High Court ruling stopping this was declared a
victory for common sense. A strike against a highly irresponsible
medical culture that, unlike that existing in any other field of
medicine or psychiatry, allowed a patient’s self-diagnosis – and a
minor’s, no less – to determine how they were treated. If a teenage girl
told doctors she really felt like a boy then that was it. She was a he.
End of.

Sometime in the early 2000s, this backwards protocol,
propagated by the shamefully indulgent, politically-driven gender
gestapo of West Coast USA academia, landed in the UK without anyone
really taking that much notice. But, and this is somewhat contentious,
once it became ‘a thing,’ suddenly gender dysphoria seemed everywhere.

Like the 1518 dancing plague
of Strasbourg, the idea just took hold and that was it. The gender
identity development service saw a surge in referrals beyond anything it
had experienced in the past.

In 2010-11, there were 134
referrals in England. By 2020-21, that figure had soared to 2,242.
Clearly, something is out of whack here. Like multiple personality
disorders, like anorexia, it’s hard to deny that, once these conditions
became more talked about, particularly among adolescent girls, more
cases began to appear. Is there a clue there?

Looking at Transgender trend figures from 2018-19, there were even referrals
of girls aged as young as three to the Tavistock Clinic. At that age,
they are just as likely to say they want to be a puppy or a unicorn as
they are to declare they’d rather be a boy. Why not take them to the

Also on
Is Royal Academy’s failed bid to cancel ‘transphobic’ artist a welcome turning point in gender debate?

If December’s ruling was a victory for common sense, this one is a
victory for imbecility. These crusading, tin-eared appeal-court judges
have desperately misread the public mood on this issue, which pits that
age-old concern of any loving parent simply wanting the best for their
offspring against progressive gender radicals pushing an ideology that
undermines those efforts.This decision is a retrograde step and the
judges should be ashamed.

Loudoun County VA: Rapist protected because he’s a “trans”? | Stella’s Place

I’m sure most of you have heard this story, but details continue to be released, and I think (and hope) that the story will become more and more public. The mainstream media doesn’t want to cover it because it is against the party line and what the woke believe.

What happened is this: A high school girl was sexually assaulted by a male fellow student. How did this happen? He supposedly identified as trans-sexual and was using the Women’s bathroom. That is where he cornered and assaulted the high school girl.

Her father appeared at a school board meeting in June to protest against the way this matter was handled by the school. As a result, he was arrested. President Biden would probably call him a “domestic terrorist”.

In October the same boy was arrested again on different charges for allegedly assaulting a different girl, at a different school. He is now in a juvenile detention center.

The first girl’s father says Loudoun County schools went out of their way to protect the child – ‘a sexual predator’. The school still has not commented.

Giving the school board the benefit of the doubt, I can only paraphrase Rand Paul:

This situation is a result of “Big Heart, Small Brain Syndrome”.

Daily Wire

On June 22, Scott Smith was arrested at a Loudoun County, Virginia, school board meeting, a meeting that was ultimately deemed an “unlawful assembly” after many attendees vocally opposed a policy on transgender students.

What people did not know is that weeks prior on May 28, Smith says, a boy allegedly wearing a skirt entered a girls’ bathroom at nearby Stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted Smith’s ninth-grade daughter.

Juvenile records are sealed, but Smith’s attorney Elizabeth Lancaster told The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school.

As a result of the viral video showing his arrest, Smith became the poster child for what the National School Boards Association has since suggested could be a form of “domestic terrorism”: a white blue-collar male who showed up to harangue obscure public servants on his local school board. . .

[more] Daily Wire

The Loudoun County Sheriff confirmed elements of The Daily Wire’s blockbuster report, alleging that Loudoun County Public Schools covered up a sexual assault that happened in the bathroom of a local high school, acknowledging that the department investigated a sexual assault that took place on the day in question

Loudoun County Public Schools has also released a statement in reference to the report, noting that it “has cooperated and is continuing to cooperate” with law enforcement in reference to the alleged sexual assault.

The Loudon County Sheriffs confirmed to Fox News and the Daily Mail that they did investigate an incident from May 28th and that the case is still pending, leaving them unable to discuss details. According to the Daily Wire’s report, and the victim’s attorney, the suspect in the first case is alleged to have committed a second sexual assault, in early October.

The Flight From White Down Under | The Wentworth Report

The Flight From White Down Under. By Steve Sailer.

Today, we see an increasing number of white-looking individuals, especially leftist female professors of grievance studies, striving for the privileges of being officially nonwhite. This has become hilariously common in Australia, where the newspapers are full of the pathbreaking feats of the “first Indigenous” this or that, almost always with a photo of an extremely white-looking person. The number of Australians who identify as Aboriginal has been soaring, especially in the metropolitan areas of the east coast, far from Indigenous settlements in the Outback. Full-blooded Aborigines, in contrast, are not doing well in modern Australia. In desperation, back in 2007 Canberra tried to cut down on the horrific rate of child sex abuse among Indigenous communities in Northern Australia by banning alcohol and pornography. Outside of athletes, such as 1970s tennis champion Evonne Goolagong, nonwhite Aboriginals are seldom well-represented in the more competitive sectors of Australian life. They appear especially ill-equipped at generating critical-race-theory verbiage to lecture whites on their racial sins. But whites in Australia will not forgo such a fundamental pleasure of the contemporary world, so a sizable caste of white-appearing academics and pundits has arisen to make their livings as professional Aborigines castigating the white man.

Authenticity? Ask Andrew Bolt.

Whites in Australia are never supposed to question the authenticity of these self-declared natives. But these experts themselves tend to be suspicious of each other’s Aboriginal bona fides. For example, both The Australian and The Daily Mail’s antipodal edition recently ran articles on the complaints of two different female Aboriginal-identifying academics about “box-tickers” and “nine-to-five blacks” who get the career and financial privileges of being nominally Indigenous in 21st-century Australia without really being Aboriginal. … Strikingly, while both essays tattled on rival women professors, neither lengthy essay disclosed the specific names of the “box-tickers,” instead just describing them generally. This reticence is presumably due to the 2011 Federal Court of Australia’s Eatock v. Bolt decision in which judge Mordechai Bromberg ruled that conservative pundit Andrew Bolt had violated the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975 by making fun of various fair-skinned professional Aborigines. Even more strikingly, both of the new accusers themselves wear their hair blond. Grieve-Williams looks rather like Donald Trump’s first wife, Ivana, and Ingram resembles a Danish milkmaid. …

A genetic happenstance and its consequences:

Naturalist Jonathan Kingdon theorized in his 1993 book Self-Made Man that while sub-Saharan genes for appearance seem to be dominant (which is one reason the U.S. subscribed to a “one-drop rule” for mixes of blacks and whites, but not for other kinds of crosses), the Aboriginal equivalents appear to be recessive. Whether that’s true or not, it has long been noted that while Aborigines often have some of the blackest skins on earth, intermarriage with whites rapidly produces much whiter-looking descendants. That genetic quirk influenced the Australian humanitarian progressives now reviled as racists for organizing the “Stolen Generations” of half-blood boarding school students. Before the development of antibiotics in the 1940s, full-blooded Australian Aborigines were dying off from tuberculosis and other novel diseases. The half-white children of Aboriginal mothers tended to be more resistant to Old World infections, but they were often neglected and abused by their sickly and alcoholic Aboriginal relatives. So, reasoned the social workers, why not raise them in white ways in boarding schools, allowing them to find a place in the modern world and thus marry into the general population? Because Aboriginal looks tend to be relatively recessive when mixed with European looks, within a couple of generations their descendants would be largely indistinguishable from the Aussie majority. Of course, as we all know now, those reformers were The Worst People of All Time. Ironically, however, I would guess that many of the white-looking woke academics who today go on TV in Sydney to tell whites what to think about the horrors of the “Stolen Generations” are themselves — at least the ones who aren’t utter LARPers — the fortunate descendants of those rescued from Aboriginal ignorance by the demonized residential schools.

But don’t listen to him — everyone knows that genetics is racist.

Trump: Who Shot Ashli Babbitt? | Call Me Stormy

During his second comeback rally in Sarasota, Fla., over the weekend, President Trump asked the question that’s on everyone’s mind of late: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt? We all saw the hand, we saw the gun.” Mentioning Ashli Babbitt for the first time in Saturday night’s speech, Trump revealed that he recently spoke with Babbitt’s mother, who is still devastated as if it happened yesterday.

Trump alluded to the reluctance of the “other side” to release the name of the shooter, but says, “We already know the name. We know where he came from.” He also slammed Mitch McConnell and other weak Republican leaders for not fighting for the Jan. 6 political prisoners. He pointed out that no one paid the price for the fire, carnage and death that took place in Democrat-run cities throughout the country, including Antifa and Black Lives Matter. Here’s the short and powerful clip from the rally.


Name of Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter May Have Just Been Revealed | The Wentworth Report

Name of Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter May Have Just Been Revealed. By Kyle Becker.

The Acting House Sergeant at Arms appeared before a House committee and appears to have named Ashli Babbitt’s shooter.

Timothy Blodgett, in an exchange with Rep. Herrera-Buetler during a hearing on Jan. 6 that appeared on C-SPAN, seems to have casually dropped the name.

“The situation where you discussed, where Officer [Byrd] was at the door when Ms. Babbitt was shot, it was our Sergeant at Arms employee who rendered the aid.”

It is interesting that Blodgett names an “Officer Byrd” in the context of Ashli Babbitt’s shooting. An African-American Lieutenant Mike Byrd was reported by Roll Call as having once left his service weapon in a bathroom in 2019. …

Apparently this is Mike Byrd, the shooter of Ashli Babbitt, on the House floor on Jan. 6

In April, the Biden Department of Justice dropped all charges related to an unidentified Capitol police officer’s shooting of Ashli Babbitt.

The contrast with the treatment of the alleged killer of George Floyd is breathtaking:

  • Black criminal and druggie allegedly killed by a white cop: video posted of cop kneeling on him, huge political movement, and the video proving the cop did not cause his breathing difficulty was kept secret (but after three months the bodycam of the events leading up to the knee part was leaked to the Daily Mail in England, and it shows Floyd saying eleven times that he could not breathe before he was restrained with a knee.) White cop sentenced to 20 years by a court likely influenced by the threats of huge massive violence if the cop was acquitted. At least one black jury member admitted they wanted “racial justice”.
  • White non-violent female protester shot dead by black guard. Media not interested. No video released. Black guard let off without being charged.

The left claim whites are oppressors and POC are oppressed. What a big lie. The reality is the blacks have are now sacred cows, while whites are discriminated against at every turn, encouraged by the media, academia, the bureaucracy, and the left.

Senators Say DOJ Official Could Have Conflict of Interest In Trump Case
Two Republican senators are questioning whether a conflict of interest could prohibit a Department of Justice national security appointee from taking part in an investigation into the Obama administration’s surveillance of the Trump campaign. Sens. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) in a letter this week asked Attorney General Merrick Garland about…