Ashli Babbitt’s Mother Speaks Out: Nancy Pelosi Orchestrated My Daughter’s Execution – enVolve – Trump:The American Years

Ashli Babbitt’s mother, Michelle Witthoeft, says Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is responsible for orchestrating her daughter’s death on January 6.

“My daughter was a California constituent, and Nancy Pelosi not only, I feel like, orchestrated the death of my daughter.”

“I’ve reached out to Nancy Pelosi’s office several times, and she has yet to call me back because she’s too busy playing in her clubhouse with all of her elite people,” Witthoeft said.

She then reminded the House Speaker about who she really works for.“You know, it’s the people’s house. It’s not your house, Nancy,” Witthoeft declared.“It’s the people’s house.

That’s my message to Nancy Pelosi,” she reports: Despite the many claims of violence that occurred on Jan. 6, evidence has yet to surface suggesting Babbitt herself was reckless or threatening.

An earlier report from The Western Journal found that there had been no documented reports of Babbitt starting fires or attacking police officers.

Her mother wants to know who is responsible for her death.“The Capitol Police should be held accountable like every other police department in the country.”

Witthoeft isn’t the only one fighting for Babbitt.In a July 1 statement, former President Donald Trump asked only the following question: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”President Trump asks who shot Ashli Babbitt.

Every American should know who shot Ashli Babbitt. An unarmed young woman was shot at point-blank range and killed for trespassing.

Any cop in this country they did that anywhere else would already be in prison.— Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) July 1, 2021Trump’s statement brought national awareness to the issue, causing Babbitt’s name to trend on Twitter.

Back in April, Babbitt’s family announced that they were suing the Capitol Police for “at least $10 million” in damages.

For the suit to be successful, the family would have to prove that the officer responsible had used “constitutionally unreasonable” force against Babbitt.

On April 14, after conducting an investigation, the Department of Justice released a statement on the matter.“

Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully,’ which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law,” the DOJ said.

“As this requirement has been interpreted by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent required under Section 242.”

In the era of police accountability and transparency, why has the death of Ashli Babbitt been swept under the rug?

No one is marching in the streets for her. No one is burning down police precincts.Despite what the establishment media and Democratic politicians have claimed, the events of Jan. 6. — while shameful and wrong — did not constitute an “insurrection.”

The continued problem from that day has been the government’s lack of transparency about Babbitt’s death.People want answers. They won’t forget — and Babbitt’s mother isn’t going to let them.

Source: Ashli Babbitt’s Mother Speaks Out: Nancy Pelosi Orchestrated My Daughter’s Execution – enVolve

Decision to strip Assange of Ecuadorian citizenship hasn’t come into force, his lawyer tells RT, while preparing an appeal — RT World News

The court ruling to nullify the WikiLeaks co-founder’s status as
a naturalized Ecuadorian citizen was the result of an orchestrated
political trial and must be overturned, Carlos Poveda, Assange’s lawyer,
told RT.
An administrative court in
Ecuador decided on Monday that Assange should be stripped of his
citizenship due to unpaid fees and what they claim are numerous
inconsistencies in his application for naturalization. But Poveda
insisted that the ruling “can’t be considered final yet” as he going to appeal it.

Assange’s attorney believes that an appeals court has more than enough grounds to overturn the “shameful” decision because his client “was deprived of his right to defend himself,” and “the evidence wasn’t examined properly.”

Assange, who is now being held in Belmarsh maximum security prison in
the UK, obviously couldn’t travel to Ecuador, but the administrative
court denied the request for him to take part in the trial via video
link and present the proof he had, his attorney said.

Assange received Ecuadorian citizenship in January 2018 after being
granted asylum in the country’s embassy in London in 2012, fleeing
sexual assault allegations that never became actual charges.

WikiLeaks founder has always denied the claims, and his supporters
insist that he was persecuted for his journalistic activities, which
included the publication of numerous classified US documents on Iraq,
Afghanistan, and Guantanamo.

The publisher “had a legal right for naturalization [in Ecuador] because he was under international protection at that moment,”
Poveda said. In April 2019, British police officers entered the
Ecuadorian Embassy and arrested Assange over accusations of breaching
bail. He has been in Belmarsh Prison since then and recently celebrated
his 50th birthday behind bars.

The ongoing trial, which Poveda says is political, indicates that an “independent justice system is lacking in Ecuador” and “gives a bad name” to the country.

The WikiLeaks co-founder is wanted on espionage charges in the US and could face up to 175 years in prison if extradited.

early 2021, a UK judge denied his transfer across the Atlantic, citing
Assange’s poor mental health. But the UK High Court recently granted
Washington permission to appeal the decision, despite increasing public
calls to release him.

Also on
US would show no mercy to Assange if he’s extradited, but Bush & Blair will never face justice for their crimes

Austrian govt vows to find allies to combat illegal migration after slating EU Commission’s approach — RT World News

Austria’s interior minister has blasted the European
Commission’s stance on migration and declared that Vienna will form
alliances with other EU states that want to combat the illegal movement
of people in their own way.
Speaking on Tuesday, Karl
Nehammer pledged that Austria would take the matter into its own hands
and work with other countries to combat illegal immigration, saying, “the European Commission isn’t reacting, hence we are reacting ourselves.”

The Austrian minister accused the Commission of sending “the wrong signals” to asylum seekers traveling to Europe for refuge, alleging that the bloc gives “smugglers thousands of euros.”

Also on
Austria’s Kurz vows ‘no stop’ to deportations of Afghan asylum seekers after policewoman assaulted

Nehammer’s condemnation of the EU’s executive body comes after
Austria ramped up surveillance at the eastern state of Burgenland’s
border with Hungary, with the Austrian Federal Army and police launching
operations in the area on Monday. The Austrian Ministry of Defense also
announced on Saturday that it will deploy up to 400 additional soldiers
to its border with Slovenia and Hungary.

Austria opened
discussions on border security with neighbors Hungary and the Czech
Republic last month. The three states share a mutual stance on the
repatriation of migrants and are in favor of stricter border control,
which Nehammer said should be “on the top of the EU agenda.” Czech Interior Minister Jan Hamacek shared Austria’s concerns, stating: “We are countries that look at migration with the same eyes.”

Also on
Anarcho-feminists storm Austrian newspaper over ‘racist’ reporting in high-profile teen gang-rape & murder case

Migration is a sensitive subject in Austria, which was heightened
following the murder of a 13-year-old girl in late June. The Austrian
authorities arrested three Afghan asylum seekers on suspicion of the
murder, and the case fueled a national debate over the issue of
deportating asylum seekers who commit crimes. The Austrian People’s
Party argued that those “who seek refuge in our country, but trample on our values and express this in their actions have no place in our country.”

capital, Vienna, was also rocked by a series of shootings on November
2, 2020, with a gunman murdering four people and injuring over 20 before
being shot dead by the police. The authorities dubbed the Austrian-born
perpetrator as an “Islamist terrorist.”

Republicans sue Pelosi over “unconstitutional” mask fines | Jim Campbell’s

Last September, Pelosi was criticized when she got caught violating her own, and public health officials’ recommendations and requirements, by visiting inside a beauty salon not wearing a mask to have her hair treated, breaking rules that only permitted service outdoors.

There is no record of Pelosi being fined for the infraction…

COVID-19 eviction bans expose deeper hostility toward property ownership | TheHill

What would you think if the government dictated that you won’t be paid for more than a year but you must keep working? As unlikely as you might consider such a scenario, this hypothetical is Howard Iten’s

Authoritarians Drunk on Power: It Is Time to Recalibrate the Government | Aletho News

By John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute | July 27, 2021

It is time to recalibrate the government. For years now, we have suffered the injustices, cruelties, corruption and abuse of an entrenched government bureaucracy that has no regard for the Constitution or the rights of the citizenry. By “government,” I’m not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy of the Republicans and Democrats. Rather, I’m referring to “government” with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law. We are overdue for a systemic check on the government’s overreaches and power grabs. We have lingered too long in this strange twilight zone where ego trumps justice, propaganda perverts truth, and imperial presidents—empowered to indulge their authoritarian tendencies by legalistic courts, corrupt legislatures and a disinterested, distracted populace—rule by fiat rather than by the rule of law. This COVID-19 pandemic has provided the government with the perfect excuse to lay claim to a long laundry list of terrifying lockdown powers (at both the federal and state level) that override the Constitution: the ability to suspend the Constitution, indefinitely detain American citizens, bypass the courts, quarantine whole communities or segments of the population, override the First Amendment by outlawing religious gatherings and assemblies of more than a few people, shut down entire industries and manipulate the economy, muzzle dissidents, reshape financial markets, create a digital currency (and thus further restrict the use of cash), determine who should live or die, and impose health mandates on large segments of the population. These kinds of crises tend to bring out the authoritarian tendencies in government. That’s no surprise: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Where we find ourselves now is in the unenviable position of needing to rein in all three branches of government—the Executive, the Judicial, and the Legislative—that have exceeded their authority and grown drunk on power. So what we can do to wrest back control over a runaway government and an imperial presidency? It won’t be easy. We are the

Five Years Later | The Wentworth Report

Five Years Later. By Julie Kelly.

Five years ago this week, Glenn Simpson, co-founder of Fusion GPS, boarded a train in Washington, D.C. bound for Philadelphia. The Democratic National Convention was in chaos after WikiLeaks released emails that showed party officials rigged the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton. Bernie Sanders supporters were mutinous; Debbie Wasserman Schultz, then-head of the Democratic National Committee, resigned on July 25, 2016. Simpson and his business partner hightailed it to the City of Brotherly Love to woo the media away from the escalating scandal. The well-connected pair met with top journalists and editors, including New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet, to spin a dark tale about the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia including rumors of prostitutes in a Moscow hotel. It worked like a charm. … That last week of July 2016 exposed the seamless and shameless web of paid political operatives, top news organizations, Democratic Party honchos, and the upper tier of the most powerful government agencies in the country. It culminated with the official launch of Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, an investigation ostensibly about four campaign associates’ collusion with Russia but which, in reality, targeted Trump himself. …

Five years of boiling frogs:

The five-year arc from July 2016 to July 2021 is stunning. It took less than five years from the time the Justice Department told a secret court that Carter Page was a foreign agent to the Justice Department telling a federal judge that a working-class Trump supporter from Florida is a domestic terrorist. It took less than five years from the time the FBI ambushed National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in the White House to the FBI ambushing Iraq war veterans and Alaskan spa owners in their own homes. And it took less than five years from the time Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was placed in solitary confinement under a pre-trial detention order to dozens of Trump supporters languishing in solitary confinement conditions in jail under pre-trial detention orders for mostly nonviolent crimes.

Differential law enforcement, depending on your politics:

Meanwhile, those protected by the legal system and the news media roam free — and continue to rake in the dough. Hunter Biden for years acted as a pass through between corrupt foreign regimes and the Biden family’s flush bank account. But while Biden still faces no criminal charges related to his overseas grift, … Tom Barrack, the chairman of Trump’s 2016 inaugural committee, was indicted on July 20 for several counts of foreign lobbying violations and obstruction of justice. Hunter Biden worked as an unregistered foreign lobbyist disguised as a “board member” for years, pocketing millions while his father was vice president and continuing after the “Big Guy” left office; he now collects steep fees for his artwork. … It’s unclear how Barrack, a billionaire, profited from his alleged lobbying activity, or even if the accusations laid out by prosecutors represent legitimate “lobbying.” But none of it matters. The only thing that matters is Barrack’s longtime friendship with the Beltway’s bogeyman, Donald Trump. Just ask Rudy Giuliani or Roger Stone or Mike Flynn or anyone in Trump’s inner circle how that works. …

Changing the topic:

And, like five years ago, when Glenn Simpson and the Democrats used Trump-Russia collusion to obscure a legitimate scandal and then destroy Donald Trump, the Capitol breach probe and January 6 select committee are the diversion from a real American scandal: a rigged presidential election that gave Joe Biden the White House. The media, as usual, is playing along, insisting January 6 was a terror attack comparable to 9/11 while claims of election fraud are a “Big Lie.”

At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, a lady asked Dr. Benjamin Franklin “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin replied, “A republic . . . if you can keep it.” Not much longer.

‘It’s not a threat’: Hungary to hold anti-LGBT law referendum after EU legal action – BBC News

Comment by tonytran2015: What are the positions of the Woke movements on Bestiality ?

…Speaking to BBC Newsnight’s Emily Maitlis, Hungary’s Secretary of State
for International Communication and Relations Zoltan Kovacs said “the EU is coming into areas where it has no mandate.”…

Hilarious: Imagine Being The Video Editor Who Censors Films For Communist China – Nwo Report

Long points out the hypocrisy of production companies using gay and minority communities in America to promote their products while allowing China to edit homosexuals and minorities out of films...

Putin views Ukraine as “the anti-Russia” and the struggle against it as his mission, Shevchuk says | Ukraine Today .org

Vladimir Putin considers Ukraine not as a country and nation in its own right but as “’the anti-Russia,’ that is as imply yet another Western project” against which he is called as the successor of Moscow princes to fight against, according to Republic portal commentator Mikhail Shevchuk.

Two weeks after promising to produce an article on Ukraine, Putin issued a 5,000-word essay which speaks to his vision of the world in general and of Ukraine in particular, one that does not promise anything positive for either in the future, the writer says.

The essay, which was released in both Russian and Ukrainian, is mostly devoted to Putin’s vision of the history of Russians and Ukrainians, two peoples, he passionately believes are in fact one because of that history and shared characteristics whatever the members of each actually think.

But Putin’s case collapses because he has no way of dealing with the fact that the existence of Ukrainian nationalism and its anti-Russian nature, which Putin points to, presupposes the existence of a separate Ukrainian nation, the existence of which he completely denies.

“Ukrainian nationalism for Putin, Shevchuk says, is the product established in the first instance by enemies.” It was not created by the Soviets when they agreed to the formation of the Ukrainian SSR and defined the Ukrainian nation primarily in linguistic terms. The current Kremlin leader would like to somehow reverse all that, but he doesn’t offer a way forward.

The most he can do is assert what he would like as somehow being historically necessary. “I am convinced, he says, ‘that the genuine sovereignty of Ukraine is possible only in partnership with Russia’” – and it is in this phrase which consists the essence of Putin’s message. He can’t deal with two peoples who are similar in many respects but who want to live separately.

And there are so many examples of this: the US and Canada, Austria and Germany, the Scandinavian countries, Shevchuk continues. Many people who even had a common history for much of the past have chosen to go their own ways. Denying that this happens or trying to reverse it only deepens the divisions….