Truth about Pfizer COVID shots getting fiercely suppressed | WND | Truth2Freedom’s Blog

https://truth4freedom.wordpress.com/2021/12/30/truth-about-pfizer-covid-shots-getting-fiercely-suppressed-wnd/

Months ago, WND reported that Dr. Robert Malone, a well-known expert on mRNA treatments, confirmed that the Pfizer shots fully authorized by the Food and Drug Administration for use against COVID-19 is not the same Pfizer shot that Americans have been getting under an emergency use status.

He confirmed the two similar – but separate – products.

“The little trick that they’ve done here is that they’ve issued two letters, separate letters for two separate vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine which is what is currently available, is still under emergency use authorization, and it still has the liability shield,” he explained. “The product that’s licensed is the BioNTech product which is substantially similar but not necessarily identical. It’s called Comirnaty … and it’s not yet available. They haven’t started manufacturing it or labeling it and that’s the one that the liability waiver will no longer apply.”

Now Just the News is reporting that the social-media corporation Twitter has punished the account of its founder, John Solomon, for sharing an article “about the legal distinctions between Pfizer’s fully approved and emergency use authorization (EUA) COVID-19 vaccines, which could affect the legality of vaccine mandates.”

Twitter claimed, to users who click a link to an article, that it “may be unsafe,” even though Just the News had an immunologist review the article and determine “he saw nothing wrong with it factually.”

The article in question explained that Pfizer’s shots against COVID-19 were approved by the FDA, “yet the pharmaceutical giant is still providing distributors across the country with an earlier version of the vaccine that predates FDA’s full approval.”

The report said, “The EUA-authorized vaccine is being distributed and administered widely in Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania, among other states. But while the product hasn’t received FDA approval, Pfizer says it’s made using the same processes as Comirnaty and no different in terms of safety and effectiveness.”

“It is outrageous and unfair that a story that is completely accurate and points out an important legal distinction between the two versions of vaccines gets blocked and my account suspended,” Solomon said in a Just the News report.

“The distinction was important enough for a federal judge to note. The story and my post weren’t unsafe,” he said. “The only threat is to the safety of the 1st Amendment afflicted by Twitter’s wrongheaded decision.”

“I can see how Twitter might object to the title, but the article itself seems ok as far as I understand it,” explained Steve Templeton, an immunologist at Indiana University. “Seems like a legal issue if the two [vaccines] are only different in how they were labeled or when they were packaged.”

Solomon reports he was told by Twitter his account was “temporarily limited.” And the company claimed the posting violated company policy on “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information” on COVID.

Others who commented to Just the News were distressed by the move, with Jay Bhattacharya, a professor at Stanford School of Medicine, confirming, “There is nothing in the story that is not well reported or misleading.”

He said Twitter’s actions to suppress COVID information “has contributed greatly to the collapse in trust in public health.” And Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff said “it’s scary” to live in such censorship.

Even the FDA has admitted the Pfizer products are separate. “A government vaccine information “fact sheet” on the issue specifically lists the shots as two separate objects.

“You are being offered either COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-Co-V-2,” the sheet insists.

It separately identifies “COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA)” as the FDA-approved drug made by Pfizer for BioNTech and then the separate “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine that is under emergency use authorization.

The difference is significant, because despite what Joe Biden has ordered, federal law does not allow mandatory shots for people unless those vaccinations have been given full approval by the FDA, not just emergency authorization.

— Read on www.wnd.com/2021/12/truth-pfizer-covid-shots-getting-fiercely-suppressed/

MPs blast government inaction on Julian Assange — RT World News

https://www.rt.com/news/542911-mps-australian-government-inaction-julian-assange/

…After a British court ruled on Friday that Assange could be
extradited to the US, parliamentarians have called on Canberra, and
Morrison in particular, to intervene during what Australian Greens
leader Adam Bandt described to The Guardian as a “critical moment in the fight against suppression of press freedom.”

Assange’s
persecution and our government’s inaction are chilling, and should
worry everyone who cares about a free press or thinks that governments
should protect their citizens.

Exposing Their Insanity | disturbeddeputy

https://disturbeddeputy.wordpress.com/2021/12/04/exposing-their-insanity/

The covid lies are being exposed everywhere you turn. In this case those sneaky lying misinformation brokers The American Heart Association are being censored by the bastion of freedom, Twitter, so we will all stay safe by listening only to the approved narrative.

https://reclaimthenet.org/twitter-censors-link-to-american-heart-association/

Maximum Censorship: School Board Critics Arrested By School Board Cops – Nwo Report

https://nworeport.me/2021/12/04/maximum-censorship-school-board-critics-arrested-by-school-board-cops/

Source: Christopher Rufo via City-Journal

Parents all across America are discovering what kind of people have taken over their school boards while they were sleeping. As pressure is applied, threatened school board members are using every tool available to them in order to censor, suppress and destroy their critics. The conflict is far from over. — Technocracy News & Trends Editor Patrick Wood

By: Christopher Rufo via City-Journal

School boards have always attracted their share of controversies: disagreements over curriculum, bitter election fights, and personality clashes. But in recent months, as parents express their frustration over Covid lockdowns, mask mandates, and critical race theory, local school districts, and federal law enforcement have upped the ante by monitoring parents, requesting undercover agents at school board meetings, and even arresting parents who attend board meetings to express dissent.

The latest and most egregious example comes from Round Rock, Texas. In a series of school board meetings this fall, two fathers—a minister named Jeremy Story and a retired Army captain named Dustin Clark—spoke out against alleged corruption and school officials’ hostility toward parents. Journalist Pedro Gonzalez reported that at an August meeting, Story had calmly “produced evidence that the board had covered up an alleged assault by the superintendent, Hafedh Azaiez, against a mistress.” The superintendent and school board president cut him off midsentence and ordered officers to remove him from the premises.

At the next meeting, in September, with the district’s controversial mask mandate on the agenda, the school board locked the majority of parents out of the room, preventing them from speaking. Clark and other frustrated parents asked the board to open the nearly empty room to the public. Instead, school board president Amy Weir directed officers to remove Clark from school property. As he was dragged out by two officers, Clark shouted to the audience: “It’s an open meeting! Shame on you. Communist! Communist! Let the public in!”

A few days later, the school district, in coordination with law enforcement, sent police officers to the homes of both men, arrested them, and put them in jail on charges of “disorderly conduct with intent to disrupt a meeting.” Families and supporters of Story and Clark held an all-night protest outside the jail, until the men were released the following morning. They are now raising funds for their legal defense.

The school board was able to do this because the Round Rock Independent School District has its own police force, with a three-layer chain of command, patrol units, school resource officers, a detective, and a K-9 unit. The department serves under the authority of the board and, through coordination with other agencies, apparently has the power to order the arrest of citizens in their homes. For many parents, the school board is sending a message: if you speak out against us, we will turn you into criminals. When reached for comment, the school district’s police department confirmed that it initiated the investigation and that “one board member requested details from the RRISD Police” prior to the criminal referral.

Round Rock is not the only school board to resort to repressive tactics to stifle dissent. In Loudoun County, Virginia, for example, where parents have protested against critical race theory and a sexual assault cover-up, the superintendent asked the county sheriff to deploy a SWAT team, riot control unit, and undercover agents to monitor parents at school board meetings. The sheriff refused, telling the superintendent that he had not provided “any justification for such a manpower-intensive request,” but the mere attempt was astounding.

Even the FBI, under the direction of Attorney General Merrick Garland, has mobilized to monitor parents at school board meetings and, if necessary, prosecute them under domestic terrorism laws. The National School Boards Association, which had requested the federal intervention in a letter to the Justice Department, was later forced to apologize after state chapters strenuously objected to the tone and content of that letter. Yet the Biden administration has moved forward with the effort, creating a task force of federal agents and attorneys to coordinate against parent protesters.

The battle lines are clear: on one side, the Biden administration, public school bureaucrats, and their armed agents; on the other, parents and families who oppose school closures, mask mandates, critical race theory, and corruption. Public school officials have demonstrated a willingness to use police power to silence and intimidate their opponents. If parents are to succeed, protesters must continue to organize peacefully and highlight corruption and abuses of power by local school officials.

“This isn’t just about Dustin [Clark] and me,” said Story. “It is about everyone. If they can come for us and get away with it, school boards nationwide will be emboldened to come for you.” He is right—and parents must work together to stop it.

The post Maximum Censorship: School Board Critics Arrested By School Board Cops appeared first on Nwo Report.