Judge blocks VAX & mask mandate for low-income children – Nwo Report

https://nworeport.me/2022/01/01/judge-blocks-vax-mask-mandate-for-low-income-children/

Texas wins latest battle in war between state and White House over mandatory vaccination, mask requirements

Source: RT

A federal judge has blocked President Joe Biden’s vaccine and mask mandate from being enforced in a program for low-income families, deeming the requirement for children to be masked and staff vaccinated unconstitutional.

Trending: Masks purposely being forced on children to dumb them down by depriving their brains of oxygen

Judge James ‘Wesley’ Hendrix ruled on Friday that the Department of Health’s vaccine and mask requirement for those involved with the Head Start program – which provides “education-related services to needy children” – was “unprecedented” and lacked Congressional approval.

“It is undisputed that an agency cannot act without Congressional authorization. Thus, the question here is whether Congress authorized HHS to impose these requirements,” Hendrix declared.

Calling the mandates “arbitrary” and “capricious,” the judge concluded that they should no longer be enforced.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott – a Republican – praised the judge’s decision on social media, boasting, “Texas just beat Biden again.”

The state of Texas has been engaged in a lengthy battle with the Biden administration over vaccine and mask mandates, with judges going back and forth over whether they should be enforced.

In October, Abbot signed an executive order banning all vaccine mandates in the state, ruling that “no entity in Texas can compel receipt of a Covid-19 vaccine by any individual” and that vaccines “should remain voluntary and never forced.”

A federal judge ordered United Airlines to halt its Covid-19 vaccine mandate that same month, while in November, Biden’s vaccine mandate for businesses was halted after the Texas attorney general filed a lawsuit.

In November, however, a federal judge overturned Abbott’s ban on school mask requirements.

The post Judge blocks VAX & mask mandate for low-income children appeared first on Nwo Report.

More US Marines Have Been Given The Boot For Refusing Jab – Nwo Report

https://nworeport.me/2021/12/25/more-us-marines-have-been-given-the-boot-for-refusing-jab/

Source: RT News

The US Marine Corps has discharged another 66 marines in the past week for refusing to comply with the military’s Covid vaccine mandate.

TRENDING: Is COVID Now Becoming a Pandemic of the Vaccinated?

The Marine Corps has been the most aggressive in discharging troops who refuse the vaccine. And it also has denied all religious requests for vaccine exemptions that have been processed. As of Thursday, 3,080 of the 3,192 requests received — or more than 96% — have been processed and rejected.

“The speed with which the disease transmits among individuals has increased risk to our Marines and the Marine Corps’ mission,” the Marine Corps said in a statement…

How Did the FBI End Up in This Mess? – Nwo Report

https://nworeport.me/2021/12/21/how-did-the-fbi-end-up-in-this-mess/

The fact that the FBI has lost its way has been on public display for at least five years now. Truth be told, it probably strayed off course way before that. But during the Trump Presidency, it became too obvious to ignore. It has been involved in everything from the creation of an “insurance policy” against the peaceful transition of power, to the targeting of parents as domestic terrorists for the sin of disagreeing with school boards. How did our “premier law enforcement agency” stray so far from its motto of fidelity, bravery, and integrity?

Anti-terrorism center accused of illegal surveillance — RT USA News

https://www.rt.com/usa/543226-terrorism-center-surveillance-lawsuit/

…The Oregon Department of Justice is being sued after its anti-terrorism
Oregon TITAN Fusion Center (OTFC) was accused of illegally surveilling
environmental and Native American protesters who opposed a gas pipeline…

Mark Meadows: Trump ex-chief of staff in contempt of Congress – BBC News

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59661306

…Before last week, Mr Meadows had provided the committee about 9,000
pages of records regarding the events, before reversing course and claiming that his communications are protected by executive privilege – a legal principle designed to shield certain White House records…

As Fascism Casts Off Its Disguises, by Caitlin Johnstone | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

https://straightlinelogic.com/2021/12/11/as-fascism-casts-off-its-disguises-by-caitlin-johnstone/

No use pretending anymore: we live in a fascist regime. From Caitlin Johnstone at caitlinjohnstone.com:

The US government has won its appeal against
a lower British court’s rejection of its extradition request to
prosecute Julian Assange for journalistic activity under the Espionage
Act. Rather than going free, the WikiLeaks founder will continue to
languish in Belmarsh Prison where he has already spent over two and a
half years despite having been convicted of no crime.

“As a result, that extradition request will now be sent to British
Home Secretary Prita Patel, who technically must approve all extradition
requests but, given the U.K. Government’s long-time subservience to the
U.S. security state, is all but certain to rubber-stamp it,” writes Glenn Greenwald.
“Assange’s representatives, including his fiancee Stella Morris, have
vowed to appeal the ruling, but today’s victory for the U.S. means that
Assange’s freedom, if it ever comes, is further away than ever: not
months but years even under the best of circumstances.”…

Supreme Court Should End ‘State Secrets’ Shield, by James Bovard | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

https://straightlinelogic.com/2021/11/20/supreme-court-should-end-state-secrets-shield-by-james-bovard/

As it has evolved, the government can invoke the state secrets shield without having to subject the state secret to any kind of judicial review, leading to all sorts of infringements on individual liberties. From James Bovard at antiwar.com:

Supreme Court Should End ‘State Secrets’ Shield

“State Secrets” is often invoked to give federal agencies a free pass from justice, without having to explain why.

Will federal law enforcement agencies ever be forced to disclose their abuses of American citizens? The Supreme Court could answer that question in its decision on a potentially landmark case it heard last week regarding surveillance of Muslim communities in California. Though the case may be decided on narrow grounds, it involves a legal Pandora’s Box that has spawned and shielded the worst abuses of the post-9/11 era.

Beginning in 2006, the FBI sent Craig Monteilh, a former Drug Enforcement Administration informant, into mosques in southern California to gather evidence against Muslims at worship. His FBI handlers gave Monteilh permission to sleep with Muslim women he targeted and to secretly tape record their pillow talk. He also placed a recording device to covertly tape Muslim therapy sessions. National Public Radio noted the surveillance “yielded no results and proved a huge embarrassment to the bureau” after Monteilh went public in 2012 to denounce his own behavior and the FBI.

Monteilh encouraged mosque members to engage in bombing and other violence. He was part of an army of 15,000 FBI informants recruited after 9/11 who fueled pervasive entrapment operations. Trevor Aaronson, author of The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism, estimated that only about 1 percent of the 500 people charged with international terrorism offenses in the decade after 9/11 were bona fide threats. Thirty times as many were induced by the FBI to behave in ways that prompted their arrest.

The FBI has been able to trample Americans’ rights and privacy because it shrouds its abuses. The Supreme Court case hinges on the State Secrets doctrine—something that the Court created in a 1953 case involving the cover-up of the crash of a B-29 bomber. The Air Force said that any disclosure of the case would expose vital national security secrets, and the Court deferred to the military. Half a century later, the government declassified the official report which contained no national security secrets but proved that negligence caused the crash.

Continue reading→

FDA Won’t Release Information on Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials for Another 55 Years – Nwo Report

https://nworeport.me/2021/11/18/fda-wont-release-information-on-pfizer-covid-vaccine-trials-for-another-55-years/

Source: Jim Hoft

The FDA is holding back information.
In response to a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA) filed months ago the FDA has asked a federal judge to give them 55 years to release data related to the Pfizer COVID vaccines.

Americans are currently being forced by the regime to take this vaccine to hold a job but have no right to see how this “vaccine” was approved.
But their grandchildren may get to see the data in 55 years.

The US medical community is losing all trust and credibility.

Via Israel National News.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA) filed over three months ago, in August of 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has asked a federal judge for 55 years to review its data before releasing it to the public in its entirety.

The data refers to the FDA’s decision to license what is now known as the Comirnaty vaccine against Covid-19, produced by Pfizer in collaboration with BioNTech. Back in November of 2020, when considering Pfizer-BioNTech’s request for emergency use authorization (EUA) of its product, the FDA promised that:

“In keeping with the FDA’s commitment to ensuring full transparency, dialogue and efficiency, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee … will meet to discuss the totality and safety and effectiveness data provided … The FDA understands there is tremendous public interest regarding vaccines for COVID-19. We remain committed to keeping the public informed about the evaluation of the data … so that once available, the public and the medical community can have trust and confidence in receiving the vaccine for our families and ourselves.”

In September of 2021, when amending its EUA to include booster doses, the FDA reiterated its commitment to transparency, writing:

“As we learn more about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines … we will continue to evaluate the rapidly changing science and keep the public informed…”

The FDA noted at the time that it was studying data provided not only by Pfizer-BioNTech, but also from the “Israeli Ministry of Health, the University of Bristol, U.K. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC].”

Debate around Victoria’s COVID-19 pandemic bill has turned ugly. Here’s what you need to know – ABC News

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-17/victoria-covid-pandemic-bill-daniel-andrews-parliament/100623972

The legislation includes key changes:

  • It shifts the power to declare a pandemic from the chief health officer to the premier
  • It allows the state’s pandemic status to be declared for up to three months at a time with no outer limit
  • It provides broad powers to a health minister to make public health orders
  • It creates
    an independent pandemic management advisory committee, to be made up of
    public health, human rights and community representatives