Ukraine tension: President Zelensky hits back at Biden comments – BBC News

… Mr Biden had suggested that a “minor” attack might bring a weaker response from the US and its allies.

But Mr Zelensky tweeted: “There are no minor incursions. Just as there are
no minor casualties and little grief from the loss of loved ones.” …

Mounting Evidence FBI Doing Property Damage at Capital on January 6th. Video Govt. Was Hiding Unravels “Insurrection” Narrative. | Political Arena

… The government said that the video below had to be kept secret for “national security” and as you can see for yourself that is just a lie. The government was forced to release this video by the court.

The video shows men dressed the same as the federal agent who was arrested in the video above, break a window and enter the Capital. The video shows them being confronted by Capitol security who after talking with the window breakers for a few moments simply walk away. It seems obvious that the window breakers identified themselves as federal agents.

The FBI is amassing a long list of crimes they either helped orchestrate or let happen.

As Tucker explains,

“We’re going to drag Trump out of the White House and torch everything” – Transverse Waves

The “Black Lives Matter” activist John Earle Sullivan, 26, from Utah, confessed to the FBI that he was involved in the “Assault on the Capitol” on January 6th. Sullivan is said to have instigated the storming of the Capitol together with CNN photographer Jade Sacker and to have been present at the death of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt.

“We did it!” Cheered the CNN reporter in Sullivan’s camerashortly after the shot at Babbitt. She then asks him if he filmed it, to which Sullivan says yes. “Isn’t that going to be the best film of your life?” The leftist activist asks the journalist, and then assures her that he will delete the material, which he apparently did not do.

Sullivan, who appears under the name “Jayden X” for the left-wing radical group “Insurgence USA” and had traveled to an anti-Trump demo, was arrested on Thursday by the FBI for trespassing. In his speech at the “Kick These Fascists Out” demonstration, Sullivan called for “the whole shit to be burned” and “Trump out of the White House”. “We’re going to get this motherfucker now,” Sullivan said.

US Capitol riot: FBI finds ‘no grand scheme’ by Trump supporters | The Wentworth Report

US Capitol riot: FBI finds ‘no grand scheme’ by Trump supporters. By Mark Hosenball.

The FBI has found scant evidence that the January 6 attack on the US Capitol was the result of an organised plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally co-ordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then president Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

“Ninety to 95 per cent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation.

“Then you have 5 per cent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organised. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.” …

FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said. Prosecutors have filed conspiracy charges against 40 of those defendants, alleging they engaged in some degree of planning before the attack.

Well duh. Mr Mueller sends his condolences.

But there were at least 20 FBI undercover agents egging things on. Did they have a grand scheme?

Some “insurrection” — no plans, no weapons, riddled with deep state undercover operatives and leftists like John Sullivan (head of Insurrect USA). Its only actual effect was to scotch the sole planned debate on election fraud. Funny that.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

Within hours of the 911 attacks, Osama bin Laden was identified as the architect – © blogfactory

…9/11 remains the pretext and justification for waging a war without borders.

sent in by Tati………

At eleven o’clock, on the morning of September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an indepth police investigation.

That same evening at 9.30 pm, a “War Cabinet” was formed integrated by a select number of top intelligence and military advisors. And at 11.00 pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White House, the “War on Terrorism” was officially launched.

The decision was announced to wage war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in retribution for the 9/11 attacks. The following morning on September 12th, the news headlines indelibly pointed to “state sponsorship” of the 9/11 attacks by Afghanistan

In chorus, the US media was calling for a military intervention against Afghanistan.

Barely four weeks later, on the 7th of October, Afghanistan was bombed and invaded by US troops. Americans were led to believe that the decison to go to war had been taken on the spur of the moment, on the evening of September 11, in response to the 9/11 attacks and their tragic consequences.

Little did the public realize that a large scale theater war is never planned and executed in a matter of weeks. The decision to launch a war and send troops to Afghanistan had been taken well in advance of 9/11. The “terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event” as it was later described by (former) CentCom Commander General Tommy Franks, served to galvanize public opinion in support of a war agenda which was already in its final planning stage.

The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage a war on “humanitarian grounds”, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the “international community”.

Several prominent “progressive” intellectuals made a case for “retaliation against terrorism”, on moral and ethical grounds. The “just cause” military doctrine (jus ad bellum) was accepted and upheld at face value as a legitimate response to 9/11, without examining the fact that Washington had not only supported the “Islamic terror network”, it was also instrumental in the installation of the Taliban government in 1996.

In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country of 30 million people.

I started writing on the evening of September 11, late into the night, going through piles of research notes, which I had previously collected on the history of Al Qaeda. My first text entitled “Who is Osama bin Laden?” was completed and first published on September the 12th. (See full text of the 9/12/2001 article below).

From the very outset, I questioned the official story, which described nineteen Al Qaeda sponsored hijackers involved in a highly sophisticated and organized operation. My first objective was to reveal the true nature of this illusive “enemy of America”, who was “threatening the Homeland”.

The myth of the “outside enemy” and the threat of “Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the Bush adminstration’s military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and constitutional government in America.

Without an “outside enemy”, there could be no “war on terrorism”. The entire national security agenda would collapse “like a deck of cards”. The war criminals in high office would have no leg to stand on.

Al Qaeda was a creation of the CIA going back to the Soviet-Afghan war. This was a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US Congress. The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War: “he turned against us”.

After 9/11, the campaign of media disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the historical evidence on how this illusive “outside enemy” had been fabricated and transformed into “Enemy Number One”.

Michel Chossudovsky, Excerpts from the Preface of America’s “War on Terrorism”, Second edition, Global Research, 2005.


Who Is Osama Bin Laden?

by Michel Chossudovsky
September 12, 2001

A few hours after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the Bush administration concluded without supporting evidence, that “Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda organisation were prime suspects”. CIA Director George Tenet stated that bin Laden has the capacity to plan “multiple attacks with little or no warning.”

Secretary of State Colin Powell called the attacks “an act of war” and President Bush confirmed in an evening televised address to the Nation that he would “make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them”. Former CIA Director James Woolsey pointed his finger at “state sponsorship,” implying the complicity of one or more foreign governments….

USS Liberty Lawsuit Reveals US Gov’t. Withholding Hundreds of Pages about Deadly 1967 Israeli Attack (Guest Post) – Station HYPO

By Michelle Kinnucan

An ongoing federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveals the US government is refusing to release at least 302 pages of documents concerning an unprovoked attack 54 years ago on an American ship, the USS Liberty (AGTR-5).

In a March 10, 2012, letter Pamela N. Phillips, the chief of the National Security Agency’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) section told Joe Meadors: “The National Security Agency (NSA) finalized the review of all material relative to the attack on the USS Liberty and made it available on the Internet.” Ms. Phillips continued: “… any future requests made by you concerning this topic will be filed with your previous FOIA case with no further action by this Agency.”1

Joe Meadors is a persistent researcher on the attack on USS Liberty (AGTR-5). As many Station HYPO readers will know, on June 8, 1967, an attack by Israeli air and naval forces on Liberty killed 34 Americans and injured over 170. Liberty is “the most highly decorated ship … for a single action” in US Navy history.2Meadors knows all about this because he was among the wounded on that day of storied heroism in the face of infamous treachery.

About seven years after a government bureaucrat essentially told Joe Meadors to shut up and sit down I filed my own FOIA requests with the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Months passed and the government produced not a single record I requested.

Fortunately, I was able to obtain the services of an excellent team of attorneys from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. The attorneys, Thomas Burke, Caesar Kalinowski, and Allexia Arnold, are not only top-notch lawyers but they’re great people to work with and on September 1, 2020, Kinnucan v. National Security Agency et al., (no. 2:20-cv-01309) was filed in the US District Court in Seattle.

That lawsuit is still in its early stages but it has already helped reveal that the US government is refusing to release at least 302 pages of documents concerning the attack. Documents still being withheld from Liberty survivors, widows, other kin of the deceased, and the American public include a two-volume 1967 US House of Representative Appropriations Committee report—containing at least 126 pages—in NSA custody. This, of course, demonstrates that contrary to Ms. Phillips, the NSA has not made available “all material relative to the attack on the USS Liberty”.

According to investigative journalist Stephen Green, the late Robert L. F. Sikes, who was an Appropriations Committee member, said the report I requested contains testimony from a CIA witness that on June 7, 1967, the Israeli government threatened to attack Liberty if she was not moved away from Israel.3Green also claimed: “The information provided by Representative Sikes has been corroborated by other committee sources who do not wish to be identified”.4Ostensibly, the NSA is withholding the report at the direction of Congress.

The alleged Israeli threat to attack Liberty was purportedly relayed via a June 7, 1967, cable from the US Defense Attaché in Tel Aviv to the Pentagon.5 I asked the DIA for “All communications and message traffic to or from the Office of Defense Attaché in Israel from June 5, 1967 to June 10, 1967.” The DIA says they have no responsive records.

In the NSA’s A History of U.S. Communications Security: The David G. Boak Lectures, vol. II, it says: “Since those days [1957], no less than 32 … U.S. facilities (embassies, legations, missions) containing crypto-equipment have come under attack, 13 of them during the 6 Day War in the Middle East …” I asked the NSA for records pertaining to the 13 attacks during the 1967 war and for the “Encrypted Traffic Reports … of the USS Little Rock (CLG-4) for the months of May, June, and July of 1967 and/or any analyses or reports that may aggregate or summarize the data/information contained in those reports.” The NSA claims they have no responsive records.

Earlier this year, the CIA released three one-page information reports from June and October of 1967.6 These reports were first released with redactions in the 1970s. Copies obtained by the present lawsuit reveal significant new source information. According to these reports, sources in Tel Aviv stated: “Israel’s forces knew exactly what flag the LIBERTY was flying” and Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan “personally ordered the attack” on Liberty over the objections of senior military officers, one of whom characterized the attack as “pure murder”.

In 1977, CIA Director Turner went on national television and emphasized that these three reports were “raw intelligence”. He quickly shifted the focus away from them onto an “evaluated overall document”.7 A day after Turner’s television appearance Alan D. Wolfe, then the CIA’s Chief of the Near East Division in the Directorate of Operations, commented that the three information reports were “raw reports which in historical hindsight were garbage, but which appeared worthy of dissemination at the time.”8

In available records, Wolfe does not explain on what basis the reports went from “worthy of dissemination” to “garbage.” As an aside, Wolfe was formally reprimanded for his role in the Aldrich Ames spy scandal. In the 1980s, Ames was a Soviet KGB double agent while working as a CIA counterintelligence officer in Rome where Wolfe was then the CIA Station Chief.

In any case, Wolfe also indicates that the “evaluated overall document” Turner cited was an intelligence memorandum dated June 13, 1967. That memo is one of the documents the CIA released to me.9 It does not mention or evaluate the three reports implicating Israeli officials in a knowing attack on Liberty. It could not because it was prepared before the earliest distribution date—June 23, 1967—of the three information reports.

So, in front of a national audience, Turner invoked a memo that he knew had nothing to say about the three reports he and Wolfe dismissed as mere “raw” intelligence. In fact, one of those “raw” reports was more accurate than CIA analysis at the time.

The memo Turner and Wolfe cited claimed there: “was little doubt that the Israelis failed to identify the Liberty as a US ship before or during the attack.”10 The second of the three information reports contained intelligence from a US citizen working for an American newspaper. The source claimed that “Around 10-11 June while in Tel Aviv I talked with an Israeli …” The Israeli reportedly made it clear the attack on Liberty was no mistake and accurately “implied that the ship’s identity was known at least six hours before the attack …”11

From the CIA, I also requested “records pertaining to the response, analysis, evaluation of, and/or decision not to evaluate, the 1967 CIA ‘Information Report’ ” implicating Dayan. None of the documents provided so far by the CIA mention or evaluate the three reports implicating Israeli officials in a knowing attack on Liberty nor do any of them reference the alleged June 7, 1967, cable from the Defense Attaché in Tel Aviv.

However, the CIA admits they are withholding in their entirety three other documents totaling 173 pages. The CIA had never before publicly acknowledged the existence of these documents. Based on timing, two of the three documents the CIA refuses to release could conceivably include evaluations of one or two of the three information reports. The CIA describes each of the two documents as an “Internal Document Prepared for the Purpose of Providing a Briefing on Several Topics”.

If you look into the Israeli attack on Liberty you will quickly encounter claims that the attack has been investigated multiple times by the US government, which, it is claimed, always found the attack was a tragic case of mistaken identity. In fact, following the 1967 attack, the US Navy undertook a hasty and incomplete Naval Court of Inquiry (NCOI) that found: “Available evidence combines to indicate the attack on LIBERTY on 8 June was in fact a case of mistaken identity.”12

However, the June 28, 1967, Defense Department public summary of proceedings of the inquiry into the attack stated: “It was not the responsibility of the Court to rule on the culpability of the attackers and no evidence was heard from the attacking nation”.13 In 2005, the Navy’s Office of the Judge Advocate General told a member of Congress that: “The Court of Inquiry was the only United States Government investigation into the attack.”14

Many of Liberty’s surviving crew dispute the claim of mistaken identity. Over the years they have been joined in that by American officials including Richard Helms (Director of Central Intelligence, 1966-1973), Lieut. Gen. Marshall S. Carter (Director of the NSA, 1965-1969), Captain Ward Boston, Jr., JAGC (legal counsel for the 1967 NCOI), and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas H. Moorer.15, 16

Perhaps all the relevant evidence, when properly analyzed in context, supports the mistaken identity conclusion. However, if the evidence supports that hypothesis then why, after more than five decades, is the US government still refusing to release more than 300 pages of records relevant to understanding the deadly attack? And what other relevant records are they withholding that we don’t even know about? Hopefully, Kinnucan v. National Security Agency et al. will pry some of these records loose and bring others to light.


1. US National Security Agency, FOIA/PA Office, “Letter from Pamela N. Phillips to Joe Meadors”, March 10, 2012. Online at <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>; .

2. Anthony R. Wells, A Tale of Two Navies: Geopolitics, Technology, and Strategy in the United States Navy and the Royal Navy, 1960-2015 (Naval Inst. Pr., 2017) p. 82.

3. Sikes as cited in Stephen Green, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel (Morrow & Co., 1984) p. 239, see also pp. 215, 226.

4. See Green, p. 275, n. 48.

5. See Green, pp. 226, 239.

6. The CIA’s document IDs for these records are: C01286836, C06140175, and C06140176. You can download these reports and other documents, including case pleadings, from: <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>; .

7. American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Good Morning America, September 19, 1977.

8. Harriet Dashiell Schwar, ed., “516. Editorial Note”, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XIX, Arab-Israeli Crisis and War, 1967, Edward C. Keefer, series ed. (Washington, DC: US GPO, 2004) pp. 1016-1017. The CIA has has neither released nor acknowledged the three CIA records referenced in Document 516.

9. The CIA’s document ID for this record is C01218180.

10. See CIA document C01218180, p. 3.

11. See CIA document C06140176.

12. US Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, “Record of Proceedings, Court of Inquiry to Inquire into the Circumstances Surrounding the Armed Attack on USS LIBERTY (AGTR-5) on 8 June 1967” pp. 161. The entire NCOI record for the Liberty attack is available at: <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>; The page quoted is included in Part 6 at <” rel=”nofollow” style=”overflow-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 96, 136);”>; .

13. Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs), “News Release No. 594-67”, June 28, 1967, US Naval History and Heritage Command, Box 913 of the Immediate Office Files of the Chief of Naval Operations: 1960-1969.

14. US Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, “Letter from Jane G. Dalton, Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, to the Hon. Rob Simmons” (5890 Ser 15.151.A1/0198), March 16, 2005, Robert R. Simmons Papers, Archives and Special Collections, University of Connecticut Library, Storrs, CT.

15. American Legion,”Resolution No. 40: USS Liberty“, Proceedings of the 99th National Convention of the American Legion, US House of Representatives Doc. 115-91 (US GPO, 2018) pp. 124-125.

16. Rep. John Conyers, “In Recognition of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer”, Congressional Record 150:130 (Oct. 11, 2011) pp. E1886-E1889.


Michelle Kinnucan is an honorably discharged US Coast Guard and Army veteran and an honorary crewmember of the USS Liberty Veterans Association. She is also an independent researcher whose writing has appeared in PS: Political Science and Politics, Common Dreams, Critical Moment, Palestine Chronicle, Arab American News, and elsewhere. Her 2004 investigative report on the Global Intelligence Working Group was featured in Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Seven Stories Pr., 2004) and she contributed a chapter to Finding the Force of the Star Wars Franchise (Peter Lang, 2006).

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist – © blogfactory

Comment by tonytran2015: In view of the false flag attack on USS Liberty and its subsequent cover-up (, this theory should not be simply dismissed.

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators

Russian 9/11 Data Dump Reveals State Actors

“9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services and Saudi Arabian financiers.” — 9/11 Investigator

Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in US history.

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Execution Plan, it does not come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.  

The ‘official’ 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars.  Not only did the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.

That’s all about to change.

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual information on the attacks than any US Government source.  

In the wake of the Anglo-American coup d’état conducted by the CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.  Especially when nations are destabilized on Russia’s borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess match go up.

Since Vladimir Putin has no intention of starting World War 3, he can only respond to US-EU meddling by using asymmetric warfare on the internet.


 Because the Obama Administration has shown no sign of aborting its planned takeover of the Ukraine, Russia is left with very few, but still quite potent options.

The following excerpt recently appeared on an alternative news website — Veterans Today — under the subtitle “TOO CLASSIFIED TO PUBLISH”.

 Essentially this unprecedented release of ultra-secret and highly classified information illustrates Putin’s new tack toward Western intractability.  Simply put, Russia will no longer stand by idly while the Anglo-American Juggernaut projects it power wherever it so chooses.

Too Classified to Publish

According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intelligence.

The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. 

Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. 

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. 

High FluxIsotope Reactor Core – Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true.

P.S. Snowden didn’t have a Q clearance so he missed this one.

The entire nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. 

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.

Early Israeli core model – Vannunu photo

It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.

Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors.  Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the USA. 

These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The one’s used on 911 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance.

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as designed. The North Korean weapons are also of the 155 mm artillery design as provided by Israel.
The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudi’s also have a stash of W-54′s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editor’s note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editor’s note: All but South Korea confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of Stanford .

Dimona – Israel

Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a “steam explosion” IE a flash over indecent due to neutron criticality back in the late 1980′s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be made.

It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it.

These were the fissile tests in North Korea. 
When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea, they were angry because they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients.

However with micro nukes even as the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on Damascus with rocket assisted W-54′s. On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.

Falling man – 911

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gamma ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I-beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day. 

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. 

The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. 

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., outside of ground zero its self. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.

If you read this excerpt closely,  you can clearly see that Russia means business.  It is what they did not say — directly — that makes this data-dump so poignant … and dangerous to the Anglo-American power structure.


Russia Today Declares 

‘9/11 Was An Inside Job’

Russian Intelligence Continues 9/11 Data Dump, Key Perpetrators Named:
US Intelligence Also Disseminates Critical 9/11 Info, ISIS Unveiled

[1] Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed | Veterans Today
by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

Recommended Reading:
Over 2200 Architects And Engineers Demolish The ‘Official’ 9/11 Commission Report
State Actors That Staged 9/11 Terrorist Attacks Disclosed, Plot Revealed, Justice Inevitable
9/11 Commission Report: The Most Ridiculous Conspiracy Theory Of All Time
9/11: The Ultimate Inside Job And False Flag Operation

US Intel: Leader of “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth” Planned 9/11 Attack!
Why Are NIST’s 9/11 WTC Reports False and Unscientific?
9/11 FACT: The Pentagon Was Hit By A Cruise Missile From The US Military Arsenal
Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on 9/11: The Mysterious Plane Crash Site Without a Plane
WHO was killed in the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon, and WHY?
9/11 False Flag Operation: HUGE Tipping Point As State-Sponsored Terrorism Is Exposed . 9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators . 9/11 Commission Report: The Most Ridiculous Conspiracy Theory Of All Time . 9/11: The Ultimate Inside Job And False Flag Operation

No Airliner Black Boxes Found at the World Trade Center?

Senior Officials Dispute Official 9/11 Claim


Published by technofiend1

Kazan- Kazan National Research Technical University Казанский национальный исследовательский технический университет имени А. Н. Туполева he graduated in Economics in 1982

Post navigation

47 thoughts on “Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

  1. BS. The nuke theory doesn’t explain how the towers disintegrated from the top ~ down, doesn’t explain William Rodriguez testimony that the first explosions started in the lower basement, doesn’t explain the NYFD testimonies and thermographic camera details or the continued spontaneous fires weeks after the towers fell or the evidence of the Mossad agents masquerading as artists who wired the upper floors or the testimony from the two survivors of WTC 7 and their multiple explosions…
    Nano thermite does explain it and there are multiple scientific papers on the evidence found at ground zero.


    1. “Nano thermite does explain it and there are multiple scientific papers on the evidence found at ground zero.”

      But that does not account for the underground fires with molten metal and steel beams red hot for almost three months, while an underground nuclear device might.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. The amount of heat needed for the lower level disintegration of concrete though, is well beyond what thermite could produce, as well as the superheated steam from the sewers blocks away and then there were those guys with geiger counters and haz mat suits that everyone seems to have forgotten about, so yeah,;definitely nuclear. It was probably a combination of both though.


  3. A lot of mistakes in this article. It convinces me the British Grand Patron of freemasonry project underwriter has both Trump and Putin dancing to their tune. Ask around. Demolition systems based on enrichment to super-criticality of low radioactive isotopes planted where and how necessary for a controlled symmetrical demolition of two 1,100 foot structures were in place since installed starting in 1969. The engineers had no warning the systems were going to be forcibly installed until after the Nixon troup entered the White House January 1969. LBJ, pig that he was, would NOT allow the systems installed. I heard some of the discussions myself. I have many comments in Some for over 5 years on 9-11 issues. Most everybody calls me ‘liar’ over this crap, but not to my face. I pity the fools. Arrogance is such a nasty low-brow attitude, like a chimp showing off his stolen top hat. Two fusion devices enriched low level radioactive isotopes in a freon atmosphere. The upper fusion devices sent these isotopes super-critical as it fell through the tower. A lower unit took care of business with the thicker steel. I am so sorry for everybody’s loss, and blame the jackasses controlling websites where people did not get my message. I did my best and have had 2-4 attempts on my life over this. My father quit the day the Nixon/Rockefeller authorities demanded the mess installed. It was an intentional sacrifice of human life by the perps. If the center of world finance left London, the British Empire and the Rothschilds were toast.


  4. I have noticed you don’t monetize your site,
    don’t waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every month because you’ve got hi quality content.
    If you want to know how to make extra $$$, search for: Boorfe’s tips best adsense alternative

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pilots For 911 have done a great job of debunking the “official story”.
    Glad to see this also coming out now.
    Maybe people will see our government was behind this.
    Of course this will change nothing as the cabal runs America.


  6. This article points out some interesting things, but it is absolutely LARDED with “literacy errors.” Please go back and EXTENSIVELY PROOFREAD, THEN EDIT, EDIT, EDIT. The text is RIFE with errors in PUNCTUATION, SYNTAX, and even DICTION. Literacy counts. Get more of it.


  7. One thing I think we can all agree on is that our government had a hand in it, knowledge of it and has helped their agenda for a new world order. Now all the need to do is get our guns.
    Everyone has their heads in the sand and you can surely bet that agenda 21 and Rex 84 shall be in affect shortly. May God save us all.


  8. Many didn’t believe the government version before this revelation. God save us. For governent to so sacrifice it’s citizens in this way.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. obvious within a few days. western globalists. uk. usa… etc did it. funny… so many people are stupid…. oh step out the front of the tv. this is my favorite commercial.


  10. This is no longer news. I saw it coming during George W. Bush campaign that led to his first 4 years – Energy and territorial security! !!


  11. I though Trump was delusional and round the twist but compared with whoever wrote this garbage he would seem as sane as anyone.
    Lalaland on steroids.


  12. Excellent blog here! Also your site a lot up very fast!
    What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link in your host?
    I want my website loaded up as quickly as
    yours lol


  13. Sadly enough none of the facts of 9/11 and who was involved will make any difference in the end. This goes so deep that no one will ever be prosecuted for this. Look at the Kennedy murders everyone knows that the CIA was behind it and most likely the same ass hat that had the Kennedy brothers killed were behind 9/11 and his evil ass died of old age without a single attempt on his life. Go figure that one out.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Name *


Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Govt confiscates $90,000 earned by Capitol riot participant for selling footage of Ashli Babbitt’s fatal shooting — RT USA News

The US has seized the $90,000 received by a participant in the Capitol Hill riot for selling footage of the death of pro-Trump protester Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by police while storming the US legislature building.

The repossession was revealed after court filings against John Earle Sullivan were unsealed on Thursday. Sullivan also received additional criminal charges for his actions during the events of January 6 and is now facing a total of eight criminal counts.

Sullivan is an oddball figure among the more than 440 people charged with various crimes related to the Capitol violence. He had his 15 minutes of fame in the aftermath, speaking to CNN’s Anderson Cooper and ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’, presenting himself as a left-wing activist who had mingled with the pro-Trump crowd to document their misdeeds. Also on Feds charge ANARCHIST who appeared on CNN after telling Capitol rioters to ‘burn this s**t down’

Shortly afterwards, he became a central figure in a theory adopted by some Trump supporters, which suggested the riot was orchestrated by Antifa and Left agitators. Before January 6, Sullivan was involved in organizing several Black Lives Matter protests in Utah.

Sullivan also reportedly did work for causes supported by the opposite side of the political spectrum, such as gun rights, and was suspected by activists on each side of being a double agent. Another explanation put forward by people he worked with was that Sullivan was simply acting opportunistically, latching on to whatever protest movement he could find to benefit from personally.

The 40-minute video that he filmed during the Capitol Hill riot ultimately led to his arrest in January. On the video he can be heard egging on participants of the rally, telling them at one point: “Let’s burn this s**t down.” Also on Capitol Police officer media claimed was ‘killed’ in January 6 riot died of NATURAL CAUSES, says medical examiner

As he moved through the halls of the Capitol, he joined a group trying to press their way into the House Speaker’s Lobby. He called on Capitol police standing in front of a barricaded door to leave. As the officers tried to move away, Babbitt attempted to get through a hole in the door and was shot. Sullivan claimed his inciting of the riot was necessary to “blend in” with the protester crowd.

Babbitt was one of five people who died amid the Capitol Hill riot, and the only one whose death was definitively linked to the use of lethal force. Capitol police refused to identify the officer who shot her, clearing them of criminal wrongdoing in the incident.

The court filings did not identify the media outlets which paid Sullivan for the footage of Babbitt’s death, but the Washington Post was among those which previously reported doing so.

Another ‘Mystery Explosion’ Has Hit An Oil Tanker Off Syria’s Coast

Comment by tonytran2015: Cui bonno?

An oil tanker off Syria’s Mediterranean port of Banias has been hit with an explosion Sunday, resulting in a fire on board which was reportedly extinguished soon after.  There were reportedly no casualties, but subsequent photographs showed large plumes of black smoke rising above the…