Watchdog slams media over Fauci coverage as report appears to show NIH funded gain-of-function research | Truth2Freedom’s Blog

A conservative media watchdog has accused corporate media outlets of engaging in censorship by failing to cover the release of documents confirming that the U.S. government did fund gain-of-function research at a virology lab in China despite multiple assertions to the contrary.

Source: Watchdog slams media over Fauci coverage as report appears to show NIH funded gain-of-function research

“Extreme Cover-Up” – Scientists Who Penned Lancet Letter To Bat Down Lab Theory Have Links To China
“Extreme Cover-Up” – Scientists Who Penned Lancet Letter To Bat Down Lab Theory Have Links To China An investigation by The Daily Telegraph reveals that all but one scientist who wrote a letter in The Lancet medical journal dismissing even the slightest possibility COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, have ties to Chinese researchers. This…

The complications from sex reassignment surgery are horrific – but in today’s trans-activist world, we can’t talk about this — RT Op-ed

A culture of silence and fear stops people learning what really
can happen when you undergo ‘sex change’ operations. The trans lobby
tries to portray it as easy and straightforward – yet it’s anything
There is an unspoken price
being paid for the fashionable transgender theories of our day. There
are unseen victims, invisible, though in plain sight. They are hidden
because their supporters believe too blindly, and their detractors write
them off, and their misery is facilitated by a lack of open discussion
and a censorship of the facts.

These victims get overshadowed by
the concerns of the general public who are caught in a culture war, by
the parents who lose children to this strange and manufactured dogma,
and by the disinterested innocents subjected to bewildering
pronoun-usage and terrible Netflix adaptations.

Also on
Parents shouldn’t have a ‘veto’ on children’s trans medical decisions? Should we let the kids smoke and drink too?

These hidden victims are the young transgenders
themselves, who are led to believe so strongly that they can ‘change
their sex’ that they undergo sex-reassignment surgery, only to find
themselves not just disappointed by the result, but horrified.

are true victims, in the sense that many of them suffer horrific and
irreversible physical damage and pain, which often leads to them
committing suicide.

may have heard of these high rates of suicide among transgender people.
What many people are not aware of is that this suicide problem is not
predominantly due to social rejection, bullying, or self-doubt. It is
due to the complex, unnatural, and somewhat shady nature of the surgery
involved in ‘sex changes,’ and its after-effects. I will focus in this
article on the male-to-female cases, as the list of complications in
these operations is long and harrowing.

It should go without
saying at this point that a person cannot really change their sex; it
comprises your genetic make-up at the molecular level (XX/XY genes). A
man who seeks to become a woman will never have a baby. The surgeon’s
knife is not a ‘magical’ transformation, it is a complicated cosmetic
operation, changing one’s outward appearance. It is a complex, fraught
rearranging of flesh.

Many young people today believe (and are
being taught) that they can elect their sex like they choose an item of
clothing, and go through with ‘surgery’ that will wholly transform them.
Often the result leads to disappointment, and there are many stories of
regret, and of (too late) reticence just before committing to the
operation. These stories are unfashionable to the ears of gender-theory
enthusiasts, who wish to forever believe that sex is a fluid and
insubstantial thing, and can be easily changed.

With male-to-female surgeries, post operative complications occur
at a rate of 32.5% (that is a one-in-three chance of complication),
and there is a re-operation rate of 21.7%. This is insanely high for any
kind of medical procedure, let alone considering this is an elective
surgery, and one that is performed, generally, on healthy, functioning
bodies. They now call it ‘gender affirmation surgery’ so that even the
language is deceptively adapted to sound positive and non-threatening.

In this sense, medical ethics and genuine concern (not virtue signalling) for these young people appears to be out the window.


is not often discussed (likely because it is not a topic for the
squeamish) exactly what are the common complications resulting from
modern sex-change surgeries. If you can bear it, I will attempt to
elucidate a few of the male-to-female complications, while seeking not
to be overly graphic. Those who are faint of heart may wish to stop
reading here.

The patient’s “neovagina” is partly constructed
from an inverted scrotum and penis, therefore any hair-bearing skin used
for the “neo-urethra” can cause
chronic infection and obstruction. In vaginoplasty, failure to perform
preoperative or intraoperative hair removal can lead to inaccessible
hair deep within the vagina. This can result in a hairball, which can be
a nidus for debris and infection.Infections are common and known to be
incredibly painful, according to sufferer accounts.

is no natural lubrication for a neovagina. In a procedure called
colovaginoplasty, a lubricant is sourced by opening up the abdomen and
using part of the colon to join the gap and make the vagina. The
lubrication comes from the bowel, and is constant (not based on
arousal). Post-op patient questions vary from, ‘Is it dangerous for my
partner to ingest this lubricant?’, to ‘Will I need to wear a pad
forever?’ (Often, yes).

Another complication
is known as a Rectoneovaginal Fistula, which is an ‘abnormal connection
between the rectum and neovagina’. The result is that the neovagina
begins to secrete fecal matter, resulting in permanent diaper-wearing.
There are many difficulties that can arise when you decide to open a new
hole in your pelvis that was not there naturally.

Sufferers have
complained about ‘never being able to have sex again’ – in some ways an
odd complaint after making the decision to castrate yourself. Another
common complaint is the necrotising of the neovagina, where the
constructed vagina (or portions of it) simply dies off.

surgery in general requires perpetual clinical follow-up and post-op
monitoring, as well as a lifetime reliance on estrogen and other

The wider trans community and the wealthy trans lobby
do not want any such negative information about transgenderism to get
out. They maintain that it is impossible to tell the difference between a
vagina and a negovagina, but this is not true. Many who undergo the
procedure learn the hard way that they have caused irreversible damage
to themselves, and their suicide rates are astronomical. There are many
stories of chronic pain and tissue necrosis that are either too graphic
to relay, and there is too much fear of censorship and legal threats
from the trans lobby for sufferers to speak out.

Also on
Tyrannical trans activists are trampling on free speech and democracy… and losing support in the process

The sad result of this is that many confused kids, often
encouraged by virtue-signalling parents and teachers, are being led down
the path that leads to these horrors. Nobody seems to care about the
realities that await them, that there is a very high chance their lives
will be ruined and they will suffer great pain and remorse. Yet the
gender theory activists still pretend that you can easily change your
sex with surgery.

These people require rigorous mental health
treatment, real role models, and a society which does not encourage them
to mutilate themselves.

Putin calls for unifed fight against pandemic instead of politicizing origins of COVID-19 – Society & Culture – TASS

VLADIVOSTOK, September 3. /TASS/. Countries need to fight the coronavirus pandemic together instead of politicizing the issue of the
virus’s origins, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, addressing the
plenary session of the Eastern Economic Forum.

“Trying to determine the causes of a phenomenon is the right thing to do. However, it’s not right to politicize things. When politicization begins, trust in the conclusions that are based on a politicized
approach declines because it immediately feels like we are far from discovering the truth. All such studies should be based on objective
data,” the head of state pointed out.


Look, I’m pretty sure we all remember how, when Donald Trump was president, all the Democrats, and their many media minions, could talk about was how America was in such terrible shape, and all because of President Trump. You know like the fact that we had become energy independent, the economy was booming, there was a real increase in wages especially for minorities and women, ISIS was eradicated and so very much more. But apparently what the Democrats were actually doing back then was to paint a picture of what America would come to look like if the American people were ever foolish enough to put them back in charge of running the country.

And so it was that courtesy of a fraudulent election the Democrats gained control of the White House and together with control of Congress, by the slimmest of margins, Democrats busily set about to wreak all manner of havoc upon this country and the world. Long before Donald Trump had ever mentioned running for office, we were constantly assured by Democrats, and their many allies in the ‘fake news’ media, that the United States as we knew it was pretty much toast…

YouTube censors Gavin Newsom critic, Errol Webber | Aletho News

By Didi Rankovic | Reclaim The Net | August 26, 2021

California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is currently facing recall in his state and could realistically lose, is still popular among at least one “demographic” – YouTube censors, whether they’re automated or human.

At least that transpires now that Oscar winning filmmaker Errol Webber is facing what reports say is “double censors” because he’s really not fond of the Democrat’s track record in office.

Webber won his Oscar for “Music by Prudence” that deals with a singer with disabilities in Zimbabwe. Back in California, though, Webber decided to flex his apparently stellar documentary-making muscle by taking on a project under the title, “100 Reasons to Recall Gavin Newsom” that looks into all the things that Newsom did wrong during his three years in office, reports say.

This is where things came to a screeching halt, at least on YouTube, where the video got blocked and placed under a total of two warning labels.

In one screenshot shared by Webber, YouTube declared the Newsom era-exposing documentary as something that “may not be appropriate for some users” (true enough – especially when it comes to his hard-core political supporters, but why would YouTube care to appease those?).

Plus, YouTube sent Webber an email informing him that his content was not appropriate for all age groups.

So YouTube was “thinking of the children,” not “of the Democrats” here.

In any case, users can still see the video but only if they wish to proceed by clicking a button on an ominously back screen complete with a prominent exclamation mark seemingly demoting danger ahead.

The other labelled screen reads, (with another the big exclamation mark and a button that lets users “understand and proceed,” reading that, “the following content has been identified by the YouTube community as inappropriate and offensive to some audiences.”

One would be hard pressed to find a video on YouTube that doesn’t fall into this nebulous category of “offending” someone’s sensibilities; but for YouTube not all sensibilities are born equal.

The video showcasing Newsom’s term in office uses “authoritative” sources like CNN and AP to document all that’s gone wrong during the governor’s rule.

“I made sure that many of the sources for this video were left wing media, so if the fact checkers on YouTube and Facebook wanted to fact check me and discredit something they would be discrediting their own left wing media,” Webber said.

And despite the hurdles on its way, Webber’s content is still finding an audience on YouTube – until, that is, the giant fine-tweaks its censorship tools to downrank what it doesn’t like without necessarily removing it.

‘Scapegoating China cannot whitewash the US’: Beijing blasts Washington ahead of American report into Covid-19 origins — RT World News

Beijing has criticized the US’s “politicization” of the Covid-19
pandemic as the American intelligence community readies its
unclassified report on the origin of the virus, amid rumors it may point
to a Chinese lab leak.
Fu Cong, Director-General
of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ arms control department,
demanded on Wednesday that the US investigate its own laboratories as
China and the world await the findings of the US intelligence report on
the origins of the virus.

Fu warned the US that blaming China
would not absolve Washington of any guilt, and once again declared that
there was no truth to the theory that Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese
laboratory. “It is only fair that if the US insists that this is a
valid hypothesis, they should do their turn and invite the investigation
into their labs,” the Chinese official told a briefing.

BBC accused of ‘omitting facts’ about Muslim culprit seen in video of shocking anti-Semitic attack in London — RT UK News
23 Aug, 2021 12:41

it reported a shocking assault that left a man in “Orthodox Jewish dress” unconscious, but failed to describe his attacker’s Islamic clothing.
Over the weekend, reports
emerged of a horrific and unprovoked attack on a 64-year-old Jewish man
as he walked down a street in Stamford Hill, London, last Wednesday.
Videos show the moment he was knocked unconscious by his attacker. He
was also left with a broken ankle.

However, the BBC’s reporting of the anti-Semitic assault hasn’t been well
received, as the national broadcaster strangely elected to describe the
Jewish attire of the victim but not the Muslim dress of the perpetrator.

The BBC simply labelled the attacker, who wore a white kaftan under his jacket, a kufi, and sported a sizeable beard, as “another man” while they described the victim as “a man in Orthodox Jewish dress.” The attacker’s attire can be seen more clearly in other images shared online.

Author Douglas Murray was among those highlighting
the unusual omission by the BBC. But while Murray stuck to the facts,
many were keen to lay into the BBC, with some claiming they have a
reputation for not fully reporting a story when Islam is concerned.

“The BBC always covers up for certain criminals,” one Twitter user wrote, while another added “Criminal Muslims. There I said it. They do exist you know.”

ask why Muslims are getting a free pass in the media, claiming the
piece in question appears to blame the Jewish man for being attacked. “Imagine
them describing the attire of a female assault victim – ‘she wore a
short skirt & high heels’ – cue outrage & ‘victim blaming’
accusations,” they added.

“One religion can do no wrong in the eyes of the BBC. Their actions are beyond reproach,” another commenter wrote, while others claimed the BBC “owned the word hypocrisy.”

Also on
Disgraced ex-BBC journalist who said ‘Hitler was right’ ripped after blaming ‘pro-Israel mob’ for her sacking

One person claimed that by “omitting obvious facts and important information” the BBC was in fact creating fake news. “Referring to one in this case victims religion but not the perpetrators shows shocking bias,” they added.

Others claimed
the BBC won’t change as reporting on crimes seemingly committed by
people of the Muslim faith doesn’t fit in with their narrative that Britain is racist. By leaving out the details about the Muslim attacker, they claimed people will assume the attacker was both “white” and “English.”

No one was forthcoming to back up the BBC, although some jokingly suggested the attacker could have been Scottish, a jovial reference to the wearing of a kilt.

Earlier this year a BBC reporter found herself in hot water after it emerged
that she’d once posted “Hitler was right” on Twitter. Having been fired by the BBC, Tala Halawa, a Palestinian journalist, blasted the
corporation, accusing it of giving into the “pro-Israel mob.”

Media Equate GOP With Taliban
MSNBC talking heads have compared the Republican Party to the Taliban because of the GOP’s opposition to abortion, a comparison that has drawn outrage from veterans and pro-life leaders. Network columnist Dean Obeidallah argued in a Wednesday article that pro-life Republicans who criticize the Taliban’s mistreatment of women are hypocritical. Joy Reid, a primetime host…

Democrats trying to convert “Evacuating our closest allies in Afghanistan” to “open borders mass unlimited immigration…” | Political Arena

Those who were our closes allies in Afghanistan should be evacuated if at all possible. We know who they are as we have a database of most every Afghan citizen complete with biometrics.

That is a very different thing from converting that to “If you don’t support open mass immigration with open borders then you betrayed the Afghans and you hate brown people”…but that is the game Democrat’s are already playing….even while thousands of Americans have been left to fend for themselves by the incompetent and callous administration.

Tucker Carlson has the video and details:…