Guide for taking over another country using dual citizens.

Guide for taking over another country using dual citizens.

by tonytran2015 (Melbourne, Australia).

Click here for a full, up to date ORIGINAL ARTICLE and to help fighting the stealing of readers’ traffic.

(Blog No. 3xx).

#dual citizenship, #multiple citizenship, #citizen in name only, #national in name only, #inclusiveness, #identity politics, #catch cry, #morphing,

A mean country Z can actually rob other countries of their wealth, heritage and carry out the genocides of their people using the following guide.

1. Sending people claiming to be refugees from some real or insignificant persecution.

The claims are a only a legal basis for admission into that country. Most countries signed with the United Nations to allow for entrance by refugees.

The mean country Z can send its citizens to rich countries A, B, C, …

After that, citizens from Z should stay in those country and try to demand compensations for “unjustified detention” while the claim for refugee status is assessed. Claimants to refugee status can expect help from legal experts paid for by those countries assessing their status and can have appeals using tax money of those countries as if they were tax payers of those countries.

Any wrong doing by custodians may also result in compensation payouts (determined the standards of that rich country) which may be a huge fortune when measured by the earning standards of the claimants from country Z.

2. Organizing those people for their citizenships in rich host countries.

Every country allow residents (including refugees) with good characters without any criminal conviction take up citizenship after some time living there.

This step is a piece of cake. Even rapists may be considered to have good characters and may be released without conviction. The Australian AAT may be a useful channel for claimants in Australia [1]!

Note that the granting of citizenship does not require any prospect for contribution to the host country! A 70 years old can also take up a citizenship and enjoy the Old Age Pension paid by a host country (such as Australia) without ever paying any tax to that country in his working life. Similarly a person already disable before entering the country may also take up citizenship to enjoy Disability Allowance supplied by the host country such as Australia. There is no need to learn the language of the host country: In Australia, interpreting service is supplied for free for the whole life of any immigrant.

3. Starting chain migration.

Each new citizen now can demand the rights to bring his family (which may have two or more wives), parents, the families of the parents to the host country.

Better still, each citizen comes back to the originating country to marry another one (may also be a same sex marriage) and bring the partner (conventional spouse or same sex partner) to the host country. The newly arrived spouse will be granted citizenship. After a minimum time of about one year, one of them file for uncontested divorce. So now the host country has two unmarried citizens. Those two citizens will continue the exponential number games.

4. Applying Identity Politics.

Make catch phrases that are wider than the actual meaning (Anti-Z, Anti-H, Anti-I, Anti-Immigrant, …) and use those catch phrases in all debates to unjustly shame and silence the opponents.

Nixon was labeled anti-Semitic because his administration was against dual citizenship in America.

5. Morphing citizenship, race, political affiliation and religion.

By morphing citizenship, race political affiliation and religions, it is always easy for foreign citizens to claim discrimination against their religions while the issue may be only about their citizenship or their politics.

6. Widening claims of discrimination to cause cost blow outs.

Forcing others to practice foreign customs under the claims of discrimination is easy:

Christian cake decorators must learn to decorate cakes against their belief, or must contract someone who can decorate cake that way on their behalves.

Public toilets must have facilities for Males, Females, Transexuals, (it does not matter how much percentage of the population is in that category !).

7. Paralyzing all serious political debates with identity politics and claims of racism and discrimination

Claiming that Trump’s requirements that applicants for Permanent Residence Status must not be a burden on America is a discrimination against the disabled and the unskilled and the lazy (or mentally unfit?).

8. Hijacking the language of the host country.

As the written constitution of any country is based on its language, the best way to stealthily change its constitution is to change its language (https://survivaltricks.wordpress.com/2019/08/26/a-new-usa-amendment-to-define-words-and-prohibit-against-their-unauthorized-modification-is-required/):

A marriage is redefined into two same sex people living together.

A “female” is redefined into anyone who think that he/she has should have female sex organs. Do you readers start to see the confusion?

A racist is re-defined to be only a White racist. A non-White racist is called an equality fighter.

9. Demanding for dual citizenship rights.

Having citizenship in the host country is not an end in this game. The citizens of Z will now demand inclusiveness in politics. They claim that they can never be released of their citizenship from their former country, or claiming that is not convenient for them. So they demand the right to be considered Dual Citizens !

All citizens of countries A, B, C who formerly claimed to be refugees suddenly resurface, applying to be allowed dual citizenship making them also Citizen of country Z.

10. Demanding rights to stand for Parliament/Congress with dual citizenship.

Currently many English speaking countries (excluding Australia) allow for dual citizenship, many even allow people with dual citizenship (meaning half loyalty) to stand for elected Parliament/Congress and Prime Minister/President Office [2 -7].

Those countries have used twisted argument that it is too inconvenient for politicians to renounce their other loyalty. So they should be allowed dual citizenship (Implying multiple citizenship and partial loyalty is all right.).

Note that currently Australia is the only significant English speaking country NOT ALLOWING people with dual citizenship to hold elected office in governments.

11. Manipulating Parliament/Congress to turn host countries into zombies.

A prominent example is the United States of America, a rich country that allows dual citizenship. Its political issues now only revolve around whether America First or loyalty to “the other country” and globalism is appropriate. Such a scenario transforms Americans with only sole citizenship to America into slaves working for “the other country” without having any benefit for themselves.

A biological analogy is that the dual citizens work as a invading virii to capture all the resource and energy of a host cell (representing a host country) to replicate not the descendants of the host cell but the invading virii. The final result is that there are more virii while the host cell will end up explosing.

A country Z can even organize its “dual citizens” with Citizenship In Name Only in both country A and country B to start war between those two countries. This will certainly bring country Z to a dominant position after A and B have been both destructed and exhausted by wars. Some people have suspected that many countries have been brought into the two World Wars by these types of plans.

12. Strategy for counter-measures.

When a nation has adopted rules for dual citizenship, the above nasty hypothetical case may happen. Its citizens should demand abolition of dual citizenship. George Washington had anticipated these problems (https://survivaltricks.wordpress.com/2019/09/03/was-george-washington-politically-incorrect-on-foreign-influence/).

Failing that every citizen of nation A must suppose that nation A will soon reach its own demise and everyone has to select and obtain for himself a dual citizenship with some other nation and then consider himself only a National In Name Only of nation A. The wealth and the heritage of nation A is then the spoil for final distribution to other surviving nations.

Notes to commenters.

This is a sensitive issues to many countries. Only comments on theoretical aspects are accepted. Comments mentioning names of races or ethnic groups will not be accepted.

References.

[1]. Guide for gutting another country using dual citizens, https://survivaltricks.wordpress.com/2018/05/30/guide-for-gutting-another-country/

[1]. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-07/man-granted-visa-reprieve-sentenced-for-raping-melbourne-woman/8597288

[2]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

[3]. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/chair-of-section-44-inquiry-says-dual-citizenship-rules-should-change

[4]. https://www.2gb.com/podcast/a-referendum-on-dual-citizenship/

[5]. http://theconversation.com/parliamentary-report-recommends-referendum-to-solve-the-dual-citizenship-saga-heres-why-it-wont-happen-96343

[6]. http://www.afr.com/news/politics/national/call-for-referendum-over-dual-citizenship-mess-after-high-court-rulings-20180509-h0zuo2

[7]. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/power-grab-by-the-political-class-thwarted-by-turnbull/news-story/0f7d8c293633d5370054a21f97aa33e6

[8]. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/utterly-absurd-british-mps-question-australia-s-ban-on-dual-citizens-20180510-p4zed6.html

[9]. https://news.err.ee/830002/reform-submits-bill-allowing-dual-citizenship-in-estonia

[10]. http://agenda.ge/news/101434/eng

[11]. https://www.novinite.com/articles/190061/Austria+Cancels+Dual+Citizenship+for+People+from+Turkey

[12]. https://ahvalnews.com/austria-turkey/austria-begins-crackdown-turks-dual-citizenship-daily

[13]. http://www.indiawest.com/news/business/is-dual-citizenship-worth-the-trouble/article_6ba6e60e-531b-11e8-b8ff-b7865dbe54ad.html

[14]. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-02/citizenship-is-key-to-liberal-democracy

[15]. https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2018/06/06/in-new-memoir-ex-obama-aide-bemoans-a-manipulative-netanyahu-not-on-the-level/

[16]. http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/89-of-our-senators-and-congress-hold-dual-citizenship-citizenship-with-israel/

[17]. https://mikeyy.org/2018/07/16/senate-committee-approves-aipac-bill-to-give-israel-38-billion-over-10-years-with-additional-perks/

[17b]. https://dailyarchives.org/index.php/news/1987-new-u-s-law-obliges-americans-to-pay-unlimited-billions-to-israel

[18]. https://www.quora.com/topic/Dual-Nationality?merged_tid=14988

(” The United States (unlike many other nations) does not require that you prove that you have renounced your other citizenship before it will allow you to naturalize, nor does it place any obligation on you to do so after naturalization. The US naturalization oath does require you to “renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity” to any other nation, but US law does not care if this renunciation of allegiance and fidelity is effective in causing you to renounce your claim to citizenship in any other country or not. As long as you meet the requirements in US law to qualify for naturalization and actually subscribe the oath, you become a US citizen, whether or not you are a citizen of any other country and whether or not that other country permits you to become a US citizen. ”

https://www.quora.com/topic/Dual-Nationality?merged_tid=14988)

[19]. https://johnib.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/australia-bans-foreigners-from-parliament-internships-after-unease-about-china/

[20]. https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/23/dual-citizens-in-congress-2/

[21]. https://richardedmondson.net/2017/12/08/do-you-hold-dual-citizenship-you-can-serve-in-congress-but-not-the-israeli-knesset/

[22]. https://www.timesofisrael.com/five-new-knesset-members-renounce-foreign-citizenship/
(“While Israelis may hold dual citizenship, a Basic Law passed in 1958 states that Knesset members cannot pledge allegiance as parliamentarians unless their foreign citizenship has been revoked under the laws of that country.”)

[23]. https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/08/14/100000-turkish-immigrants-could-be-stripped-of-austrian-dual-citizenship/

[24]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Germany, (“If today [1997] we give in to demands for dual citizenship, we would soon have four, five, or six million Turks in Germany, instead of three million – Chancellor Helmut Kohl, in 1997.”)

[25]. https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-migrant-program-offers-cautions-us-073113485.html, March 29, 2013, (“Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has refused calls from Turkish and other immigrant communities to allow dual citizenship. Many immigrants are reluctant to apply for German citizenship because they want to hold on to their original nationality.”)

[26], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/the-us-the-century-of-lost-wars/

[27], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

[28]. https://alethonews.com/2018/09/16/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

More and more tax

[29]. https://patriotpost.us/articles/58559-americans-pay-more-in-taxes-than-on-food-and-clothing

[30]. https://papundits.wordpress.com/2018/10/01/americans-pay-more-in-taxes-than-on-food-and-clothing/

[31]. https://survivaltricks.wordpress.com/2019/08/26/a-new-usa-amendment-to-define-words-and-prohibit-against-their-unauthorized-modification-is-required/

[32]. https://survivaltricks.wordpress.com/2019/09/03/was-george-washington-politically-incorrect-on-foreign-influence/

RELATED Social Issues Blogs

magnifier horizontal

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Latest

Social Issues Blogs, , , ,

_

Click here to go to Home Page (Navigation-Survival-How To-Money).

SUBSCRIPTION: [RSS – Posts], [RSS – Comments]

MENU: [Contents][Blog Image of Contents ][Archives ] [About]

Dual citizenship destroys the integrity of American citizenship

 

Dual citizenship destroys the integrity of American citizenship

by tonytran2015 (Melbourne, Australia).

Click here for a full, up to date ORIGINAL ARTICLE and to help fighting the stealing of readers’ traffic.

(Blog No. 153)

#dual citizenship, #multiple citizenship, #citizen in name only, #American in name only, #inclusiveness,

Dual citizenship destroys the integrity of American citizenship.

1. Unsuccessful attempt by Nixon’s Government to defend the integrity of American citizenship.

Believe it or not, the Secretary of State Dean Rusk of Nixon administration was the last defender of the integrity of American citizenship. There are well known 3 court cases involving his Department of State to protect the integrity of US Citizenship [1,2,3].

The actions of the Department of State was not to have some dramatic outcomes of the nature of the case cited in [4] but sought to uphold the integrity of the American citizenship. Citizenship up to then was to mean exclusive loyalty to only one single country.

However the actions failed and American citizenship from there on has become a commodity with no sacred value.

2. The rise of “dual citizenship”.

The failure of Nixon’s government to uphold the exclusiveness of American citizenship has open a flood gate to many non-clear-cut situations which are now acknowledged in US government’s websites.

The official website of the Department of State of USA states that

“U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one nationality or another. A U.S. citizen may naturalize in a foreign state without any risk to his or her U.S. citizenship. However, persons who acquire a foreign nationality after age 18 by applying for it may relinquish their U.S. nationality if they wish to do so [5].”

and as long as a “dual citizen” keeps clear of the following acts, he would preserve his “dual citizenship”

“Section 349 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. nationals are subject to loss of nationality if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. nationality. Briefly stated, these acts include:

  1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state after the age of 18 (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
  2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or its political subdivisions after the age of 18 (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
  3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the United States or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
  4. accepting employment with a foreign government after the age of 18 if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
  5. formally renouncing U.S. nationality before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
  6. formally renouncing U.S. nationality within the United States (The Department of Homeland Security is responsible for implementing this section of the law, and any inquiries should be directed to DHS) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
  7. conviction for an act of treason against the Government of the United States or for attempting by force to overthrow, or bear arms against, the Government of the United States (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA). [6]”.

This makes it easy for “dual citizens” to exploit their (unfair?) advantages over traditional citizens of the USA.

There has been then many organizations promoting “dual citizenship” and even “multiple citizenship” . A typical promotion is

“…Typically, no American will forfeit his or her citizenship by undertaking the responsibilities of citizenship in another country. This is true even if the responsibilities include traveling with a foreign passport, voting in another country’s election, or running for and/or serving in public office of another country. In most cases, it is unimportant to U.S. authorities whether another country also claims you as a citizen.

The loss of U.S. citizenship can only occur if a person’s actions demonstrate an intent to give up his or her citizenship. Such actions might include:

  • Serving in the armed forces of a country which is engaged in hostilities against the United States.
  • Formally renouncing one’s U.S. citizenship in front of a duly authorized U.S. official.
  • Committing an act of treason against the United States, or attempting or conspiring to overthrow the U.S. Government.[7].”

More definitions and cautions on multi-citizenship can be found in [8-11]. The situation is so hilarious that there is currently something like a contest to reach the most multiple number of citizenship [12,13,14,15,16].

3. American citizenship has reduced to only a registration for entitlement.

So American citizenship has now reduced to a registration for entitlements and has lost its traditional sacred value. The rulings in the case of Kawakita_v._United_States [4] would now seem to be even more confusing.

The questions arising are:

  1. There is not yet any hostility between Am and J. If an American citizen K returns to its other country J and serve in the military there. Does citizen K lose his American citizenship ?
  2. Am and J declare war on each other. This is not in the intention of K ! Does K then lose his citizenship or does he commit treason against Am by the action of J ?

During the tension time between Greece and Turkey regarding Aegean sea (1987) [17], there were in Australia many “Greek – Australian dual citizens” as well as “Turkish – Australian dual citizens”. The question arising then was: If those “dual citizens” maimed one another in Aegean sea and return to Australia who will pay for the treatments and invalidity pensions of those war veterans?

“Dual citizenship” has thus caused a mess for many administrations. There is an American organization pointing out many of those problems [18]. Dual and multiple citizenship have been seen as a creeping power-grab by globalist movements [19].

“Dual citizenship” is thus an antithesis to nationalism on which most nations are based on. Opening the flood gate to “dual citizenship” is the first step to con Americans to abolish nationalism. Surely, the American lefts have now called for a World Order without border and with only their (destructive or otherwise) ideology [20].

4. Dual citizenship in competing countries.

Russia had embraced the concept of “Dual Citizenship” following the dissolution of the Soviet Union but is now backing out of that system [21-24]. Chinese “nationality law states that China does not recognize dual nationality with any other country (Article 3), although the clause can be interpreted differently based on the residency of a Chinese national.” [25]. India does not allow widespread dual citizenship [26]. There are many other countries taking the same view [10,27,28]

5. Dual citizens can now even stand for American elected offices.

Having citizenship in the host country is not an end in this game. The citizens of a foreign country Z will next demand inclusiveness in politics. They claim that they can never be released of their citizenship from their former country, or claiming that is not convenient for them. So they demand the right to be considered Dual Citizens !

The concept of “Dual Citizens holding high Elected Offices” is outrageous to Australians [29-34] and citizens of many other countries such as Russia [21-24], China [25] but is not for Americans [35].

6. Troubling future for countries with congresses made up from dual citizens.

There is a possible hypothetical case: A country Z can organize its “dual citizens” in country A to vote to give all national wealth of country A to country Z. After that all “dual citizens” of A renounces their citizenship from A and enjoy their rich lives in country Z. Only the “sole citizens” of A have to remain in A and suffer poverty.

This is a second hypothetical case: A country Z can organize its “dual citizens” with Citizenship In Name Only in both country A and country B to start war between those two powerful countries. This will certainly bring country Z to a dominant position after A and B have been both destructed and exhausted by wars. Some people have suspected that many countries have been brought into the past two World Wars by these types of plans.

7. Notes to commenters.

This is a sensitive issues to many countries. Only comments on theoretical aspects are accepted. Comments mentioning names of races or ethnic groups will not be accepted.

References.

[1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk

[2]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schneider_v._Rusk

[3]. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/369/367.html

[4]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawakita_v._United_States

[5]. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/Advice-about-Possible-Loss-of-US-Nationality-Dual-Nationality/Dual-Nationality.html

[6]. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/Advice-about-Possible-Loss-of-US-Nationality-Dual-Nationality.html

[7]. https://www.legallanguage.com/legal-articles/dual-citizenship-united-states/

[8]. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-dual-citizenship-20141228-story.html

[9]. https://immigration.findlaw.com/citizenship/dual-citizenship.html

[10]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

[11]. https://www.internationalcitizens.com/living-abroad/become-a-citizen.php

[12]. https://immigration.findlaw.com/citizenship/dual-citizenship.html

[13]. https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/questions/5945/what-is-the-highest-number-of-citizenships-one-can-hold

[14]. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-greatest-number-of-citizenships-ever-held-by-one-person

[15]. https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/2077576/case-canadian-eight-citizenships-and-why-worlds-rich

[16]. https://www.sovereignman.com/residency/this-guy-has-eight-passports-21224/

[17]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_Aegean_crisis

[18]. https://cis.org/Reforming-Dual-Citizenship-United-States

[19]. https://www.second-citizenship.org/second-citizenship/dual-and-multiple-citizenship-as-a-direct-consequence-of-globalization/

[20]. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/07/23/comey-cautions-democrats-against-socialist-left-democrats-pounce/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.53d7084ed6ca

[21]. https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/russia-targets-traitorous-dual-citizenship-holders-35973

[22]. https://www.rbth.com/society/2014/08/12/hiding_dual_citizenship_now_a_criminal_offense_in_russia_38929.html

[23]. http://intermarkrelocation.ru/about/news/notification-on-dual-citizenship-for-russian-nationals/

[24]. https://investmentmigration.org/articles/dual-citizenship-controls-restrictions-russia/

[25]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationality_law_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

[26]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_nationality_law#Renunciation_and_termination_of_Indian_citizenship

[27]. https://ahvalnews.com/austria-turkey/austria-begins-crackdown-turks-dual-citizenship-daily

[28]. http://www.indiawest.com/news/business/is-dual-citizenship-worth-the-trouble/article_6ba6e60e-531b-11e8-b8ff-b7865dbe54ad.html

[29]. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/utterly-absurd-british-mps-question-australia-s-ban-on-dual-citizens-20180510-p4zed6.html

[30]. https://www.2gb.com/podcast/a-referendum-on-dual-citizenship/

[31]. http://theconversation.com/parliamentary-report-recommends-referendum-to-solve-the-dual-citizenship-saga-heres-why-it-wont-happen-96343

[32]. http://www.afr.com/news/politics/national/call-for-referendum-over-dual-citizenship-mess-after-high-court-rulings-20180509-h0zuo2

[33]. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/power-grab-by-the-political-class-thwarted-by-turnbull/news-story/0f7d8c293633d5370054a21f97aa33e6

[34]. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/chair-of-section-44-inquiry-says-dual-citizenship-rules-should-change

[35]. http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/89-of-our-senators-and-congress-hold-dual-citizenship-citizenship-with-israel/

Added after 2018 Aug 15:

[36]. https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/23/dual-citizens-in-congress-2/

[37]. https://richardedmondson.net/2017/12/08/do-you-hold-dual-citizenship-you-can-serve-in-congress-but-not-the-israeli-knesset/

[38]. https://www.timesofisrael.com/five-new-knesset-members-renounce-foreign-citizenship/
(“While Israelis may hold dual citizenship, a Basic Law passed in 1958 states that Knesset members cannot pledge allegiance as parliamentarians unless their foreign citizenship has been revoked under the laws of that country.”)

[39]. https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/08/14/100000-turkish-immigrants-could-be-stripped-of-austrian-dual-citizenship/

[40]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Germany, (“If today [1997] we give in to demands for dual citizenship, we would soon have four, five, or six million Turks in Germany, instead of three million – Chancellor Helmut Kohl, in 1997.”)

[41]. https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-migrant-program-offers-cautions-us-073113485.html, March 29, 2013, (“Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has refused calls from Turkish and other immigrant communities to allow dual citizenship. Many immigrants are reluctant to apply for German citizenship because they want to hold on to their original nationality.”)

[42]. https://cnstopstories.com/2018/08/17/citizenship-question-for-2020-census-prompts-strong-criticism-lawsuits/, (Census question on citizenship is now even considered offensive).

[43], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/the-us-the-century-of-lost-wars/

[44], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

[45]. https://alethonews.com/2018/09/16/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

[46]. https://ostrich-report.com/2018/11/26/5-reasons-why-living-in-the-ussr-was-a-nightmare/

[47]. https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/29/lying-for-israel-why-nearly-everyone-in-washington-does-it/

[47b]. https://justice4poland.com/2020/02/04/lying-for-israel-why-nearly-everyone-in-washington-does-it/

RELATED Social Issues Blogs

magnifier horizontal

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Latest   Social Issues Blogs,

, , ,

divider43.jpg 

  polymeraust100dollars 

   

Click here go to Divider63D400 Home Page (Navigation-Survival-How To-Money).

SUBSCRIPTION: [RSS – Posts], [RSS – Comments]

MENU: [Contents][Blog Image of Contents ][Archives ] [About]

 

Guide for gutting another country using dual citizens.

 

Guide for gutting another country using dual citizens.

by tonytran2015 (Melbourne, Australia).

Click here for a full, up to date ORIGINAL ARTICLE and to help fighting the stealing of readers’ traffic.

(Blog No. 138).

#dual citizenship, #multiple citizenship, #citizen in name only, #national in name only, #inclusiveness,

A mean country Z can actually rob other countries of their wealth, heritage and carry out the genocides of their people using the following guide.

1. Sending people claiming to be refugees from some real or insignificant persecution.

The claims are a only a legal basis for admission into that country. Most countries signed with the United Nations to allow for entrance by refugees.

The mean country Z can send its citizens to rich countries A, B, C, …

After that, citizens from Z should stay in those country and try to demand compensations for “unjustified detention” while the claim for refugee status is assessed. Claimants to refugee status can expect help from legal experts paid for by those countries assessing their status and can have appeals using tax money of those countries as if they were tax payers of those countries.

Any wrong doing by custodians may also result in compensation payouts (determined the standards of that rich country) which may be a huge fortune when measured by the earning standards of the claimants from country Z.

2. Organizing those people for their citizenship in rich countries.

Every country allow residents (including refugees) with good characters without any criminal conviction take up citizenship after some time living there.

This step is a piece of cake. Even rapists may be considered to have good characters and may be released without conviction. The Australian AAT may be a useful channel for claimants in Australia [1]!

Note that the granting of citizenship does not require any prospect for contribution to the host country! A 70 years old can also take up a citizenship and enjoy the Old Age Pension paid by a host country (such as Australia) without ever paying any tax to that country in his working life. Similarly a person already disable before entering the country may also take up citizenship to enjoy Disability Allowance supplied by the host country such as Australia. There is no need to learn the language of the host country: In Australia, interpreting service is supplied for free for the whole life of any immigrant.

3. Starting chain migration.

Each new citizen now can demand the rights to bring his family (which may have two or more wives), parents, the families of the parents to the host country.

Better still, each citizen comes back to the originating country to marry another one (may also be a same sex marriage) and bring the partner (conventional spouse or same sex partner) to the host country. The newly arrived spouse will be granted citizenship. After a minimum time of about one year, one of them file for uncontested divorce. So now the host country has two unmarried citizens. Those two citizens will continue the exponential number games.

4. Demanding for dual citizenship rights.

Having citizenship in the host country is not an end in this game. The citizens of Z will now demand inclusiveness in politics. They claim that they can never be released of their citizenship from their former country, or claiming that is not convenient for them. So they demand the right to be considered Dual Citizens !

All citizens of countries A, B, C who formerly claimed to be refugees suddenly resurface, applying to be allowed dual citizenship making them also Citizen of country Z.

5. Demanding rights to stand for Parliament/Congress with dual citizenship.

Currently many English speaking countries (excluding Australia) allow for dual citizenship, many even allow people with dual citizenship (meaning half loyalty) to stand for elected Parliament/Congress and Prime Minister/President Office [2 -7].

Those countries have used twisted argument that it is too inconvenient for politicians to renounce their other loyalty. So they should be allowed dual citizenship (Implying multiple citizenship and partial loyalty is all right.).

Note that currently Australia is the only significant English speaking country NOT ALLOWING people with dual citizenship to hold elected office in governments.

6. Manipulating Parliament/Congress to turn host countries into zombies.

A prominent example is the United States of America, a rich country that allows dual citizenship. Its political issues now only revolve around whether America First or loyalty to “the other country” and globalism is appropriate. Such a scenario transforms Americans with only sole citizenship to America into slaves working for “the other country” without having any benefit for themselves.

A biological analogy is that the dual citizens work as a invading virii to capture all the resource and energy of a host cell (representing a host country) to replicate not the descendants of the host cell but the invading virii. The final result is that there are more virii while the host cell will end up explosing.

A country Z can even organize its “dual citizens” with Citizenship In Name Only in both country A and country B to start war between those two countries. This will certainly bring country Z to a dominant position after A and B have been both destructed and exhausted by wars. Some people have suspected that many countries have been brought into the two World Wars by these types of plans.

7. Strategy for counter-measures.

When a nation has adopted rules for dual citizenship, the above nasty hypothetical case may happen. Its citizens should demand abolition of dual citizenship.

Failing that every citizen of nation A must suppose that nation A will soon reach its own demise and everyone has to select and obtain for himself a dual citizenship with some other nation and then consider himself only a National In Name Only of nation A. The wealth and the heritage of nation A is then the spoil for final distribution to other surviving nations.

Notes to commenters.

This is a sensitive issues to many countries. Only comments on theoretical aspects are accepted. Comments mentioning names of races or ethnic groups will not be accepted.

References.

[1]. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-07/man-granted-visa-reprieve-sentenced-for-raping-melbourne-woman/8597288

[2]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

[3]. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/chair-of-section-44-inquiry-says-dual-citizenship-rules-should-change

[4]. https://www.2gb.com/podcast/a-referendum-on-dual-citizenship/

[5]. http://theconversation.com/parliamentary-report-recommends-referendum-to-solve-the-dual-citizenship-saga-heres-why-it-wont-happen-96343

[6]. http://www.afr.com/news/politics/national/call-for-referendum-over-dual-citizenship-mess-after-high-court-rulings-20180509-h0zuo2

[7]. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/power-grab-by-the-political-class-thwarted-by-turnbull/news-story/0f7d8c293633d5370054a21f97aa33e6

[8]. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/utterly-absurd-british-mps-question-australia-s-ban-on-dual-citizens-20180510-p4zed6.html

[9]. https://news.err.ee/830002/reform-submits-bill-allowing-dual-citizenship-in-estonia

[10]. http://agenda.ge/news/101434/eng

[11]. https://www.novinite.com/articles/190061/Austria+Cancels+Dual+Citizenship+for+People+from+Turkey

[12]. https://ahvalnews.com/austria-turkey/austria-begins-crackdown-turks-dual-citizenship-daily

[13]. http://www.indiawest.com/news/business/is-dual-citizenship-worth-the-trouble/article_6ba6e60e-531b-11e8-b8ff-b7865dbe54ad.html

[14]. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-02/citizenship-is-key-to-liberal-democracy

[15]. https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2018/06/06/in-new-memoir-ex-obama-aide-bemoans-a-manipulative-netanyahu-not-on-the-level/

Added after 2018 July 04:

[16]. http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/89-of-our-senators-and-congress-hold-dual-citizenship-citizenship-with-israel/

[17]. https://mikeyy.org/2018/07/16/senate-committee-approves-aipac-bill-to-give-israel-38-billion-over-10-years-with-additional-perks/

[17b]. https://dailyarchives.org/index.php/news/1987-new-u-s-law-obliges-americans-to-pay-unlimited-billions-to-israel

[18]. https://www.quora.com/topic/Dual-Nationality?merged_tid=14988

(” The United States (unlike many other nations) does not require that you prove that you have renounced your other citizenships before it will allow you to naturalize, nor does it place any obligation on you to do so after naturalization. The US naturalization oath does require you to “renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity” to any other nation, but US law does not care if this renunciation of allegiance and fidelity is effective in causing you to renounce your claim to citizenship in any other country or not. As long as you meet the requirements in US law to qualify for naturalization and actually subscribe the oath, you become a US citizen, whether or not you are a citizen of any other country and whether or not that other country permits you to become a US citizen. ”

https://www.quora.com/topic/Dual-Nationality?merged_tid=14988)

[19]. https://johnib.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/australia-bans-foreigners-from-parliament-internships-after-unease-about-china/

Added after 2018 Aug 15:

[20]. https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/23/dual-citizens-in-congress-2/

[21]. https://richardedmondson.net/2017/12/08/do-you-hold-dual-citizenship-you-can-serve-in-congress-but-not-the-israeli-knesset/

[22]. https://www.timesofisrael.com/five-new-knesset-members-renounce-foreign-citizenship/
(“While Israelis may hold dual citizenship, a Basic Law passed in 1958 states that Knesset members cannot pledge allegiance as parliamentarians unless their foreign citizenship has been revoked under the laws of that country.”)

[23]. https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/08/14/100000-turkish-immigrants-could-be-stripped-of-austrian-dual-citizenship/

[24]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Germany, (“If today [1997] we give in to demands for dual citizenship, we would soon have four, five, or six million Turks in Germany, instead of three million – Chancellor Helmut Kohl, in 1997.”)

[25]. https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-migrant-program-offers-cautions-us-073113485.html, March 29, 2013, (“Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has refused calls from Turkish and other immigrant communities to allow dual citizenship. Many immigrants are reluctant to apply for German citizenship because they want to hold on to their original nationality.”)

[26], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/the-us-the-century-of-lost-wars/

[27], http://www.unz.com/jpetras/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

[28]. https://alethonews.com/2018/09/16/us-war-strategists-military-defeats-and-political-success/

More and more tax

[29]. https://patriotpost.us/articles/58559-americans-pay-more-in-taxes-than-on-food-and-clothing

[30]. https://papundits.wordpress.com/2018/10/01/americans-pay-more-in-taxes-than-on-food-and-clothing/

RELATED Social Issues Blogs

magnifier horizontal

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Latest

Social Issues Blogs, , , ,

_

Click here to go to Home Page (Navigation-Survival-How To-Money).

SUBSCRIPTION: [RSS – Posts], [RSS – Comments]

MENU: [Contents][Blog Image of Contents ][Archives ] [About]